Quantcast
Channel: BOOK of MORMON RESOURCES
Viewing all 358 articles
Browse latest View live

Testaments

$
0
0
The last two days have been glorious - the 182nd annual General Conference of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The spirit I feel listening to conference is the same one I feel reading The Book of Mormon - the Holy Ghost bearing witness of eternal truth John 16:13, Moroni 10:5. I was particularly impressed by Elder Russell M. Nelson's talk about the wonders of our physical body as a tabernacle for our immortal spirit. Our bodies are a divine gift. Our spirits are a divine gift. Together they comprise our soul which has eternal worth and endless potential. For both body and spirit, thanks be to God.  2011 was the 400th anniversary of the King James Version of the Holy Bible. The Book of Mormon, written in the Elizabethan English of the KJV (Royal Skousen's observation), has been on the earth now for 182 years. For both works of scripture, thanks be to God.
--
My wife and I appreciated Sister Julie Bangerter Beck's talk about faith, family and relief in the Relief Society. We went to high school with Sister Beck, so the last five years of her presidency have been especially meaningful for us as we have watched her, Sister Allred and Sister Thompson magnify their callings in remarkable ways around the world. Serving as the Bishop of a large and dynamic ward, I have profound love and respect for the Relief Society and the way its members quietly go about doing good Acts 10:38.
--
And then there was Elder D. Todd Cristofferson's talk about the doctrine of Christ 2 Nephi 31:2.  Our doctrine is clear, pure, and easy to understand reminding one of Nephi's high standard "plainness, in the which I know that no man can err" 2 Nephi 25:7. We learn truth through both reason and faith D&C 88:118. We respect hermeneutics and exegesis as we seek revelation from God in both individual and council settings appropriate to our stewardships D&C 20:35. Continuing revelation, primarily through the Holy Ghost, to the prophets, seers and revelators D&C 107:92 in our day confirms all prior testaments of Jesus Christ (Old Testament; The New Testament of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ; The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ), and expounds the doctrine of Christ stated anew.
--
I am currently 58 years old. When I was 16, I first read The Book of Mormon cover to cover and the Spirit witnessed powerfully to me that this work is ancient, true and important both in God's plan for our earth in these latter days and for me personally. Since then I have spent thousands of joyous hours immersed in the text of The Book of Mormon, and my investment has paid bountiful dividends. The Book of Mormon is clear, pure, and easy to understand. For both its setting and its doctrine, thanks be to God. Any person who feasts upon its words 2 Nephi 31:20 will be better able to go about doing good. - Kirk Alder Magleby.
--
For more thoughts on the Gospel and the Church (Elder Donald L. Hallstrom's moving talk) see my profile on mormon.org.

Minon

$
0
0
The land of Minon only appears once by name in the Nephite record, in Alma 2:24 during the Amlicite - Lamanite invasion of Zarahemla ca. 87 B.C. It is referenced a second time in the second Lamanite invasion that occurred a few days after Amlici's death Alma 3:20. The place where the Amlicites met the Lamanites was just across the river Sidon from the valley of Gideon. Here is what we can glean about Minon from these passages and their context:
  • Minon was above the local land of Zarahemla Alma 2:24 which we interpret to mean at a higher elevation 1 than and upstream from Zarahemla.
  • Minon was in the course of the land of Nephi Alma 2:24, so Minon was south 2 of the local land of Zarahemla, upstream on the Sidon.
  • The Amlicite army, after its defeat on Hill Amnihu east of Sidon Alma 2:15, fled toward the valley of Gideon Alma 2:20 and then crossed over the river Sidon and joined forces with Lamanite allies in the land of Minon Alma 2:24. This means Minon was west 3 of Sidon.
  • Minon and the local land of Zarahemla shared a common border 4 because the combined Amlicite - Lamanite army moved from Minon to the banks of the Sidon in Zarahemla in a single day Alma 2:27.
  • There was some kind of obstruction along the river 5 Sidon in between Zarahemla and Minon. Even with several hours head start, the combined Amlicite - Lamanite army still arrived at the battle field on the west bank of Sidon after the advance Nephite troops Alma 2:27. The Amlicites - Lamanites must have had to go around or over something rather than simply march downriver.
  • Minon, immediately upstream from the local land of Zarahemla, was less densely populated 6 than Zarahemla in the plains. We know this because the people of Minon fled to Zarahemla for protection when their land was invaded Alma 2:25.
  • Minon was on the border 7 of settled Nephite lands ca. 87 B.C. Alma 3:23.
We will use criteria 1 - 7 shaded in aqua to locate the land of Minon on the modern map. Our proposal for Minon is the upland region immediately south of the piedmont zone east of the Chilapa and west of the Usumacinta in the Mexican states of Chiapas and Tabasco.
Proposed land of Minon in its setting
1. We compute average elevation of a proposed Book of Mormon land by letting Google Earth calculate the average elevations of northeast to southwest and northwest to southeast transects and then averaging the averages. Doing this with our Minon results in an average elevation of 258 meters.
Proposed land of Minon with elevation transects
Minon at 258 meters average elevation is substantially higher than Zarahemla at 53 meters average elevation (See point #6 in the article "Gideon" in this blog). Minon is also upstream from Zarahemla. Criterion 1 satisfied.

2 3. Our Minon is obviously south of our local land of Zarahemla, west of and upstream on the Sidon. Criteria 2 and 3 satisfied.

4. Our proposed Minon does indeed share a common border with our proposed local land of Zarahemla. Criterion 4 satisfied.

5. The Minon - Zarahemla border where the Usumacinta River comes out of the highlands and empties into the coastal plain is the dramatic Boca del Cerro (Mouth of the Hill) near Tenosique, Tabasco.
Boca del Cerro looking upstream from the bridge.
Photo by Kirk Magleby September 2006
Boca del Cerro is a narrow gorge flanked by high hills (325 meters elevation) on both sides. Modern watercraft can navigate the gorge, but horse trails and roads go around it. The Amlicite - Lamanite army almost certainly went around Boca del Cerro, giving Alma's troops time to reach the battleground west of Sidon slightly ahead of their enemy.
Likely routes of Amlici and Alma to their battleground west of Sidon
See the article entitled "Gideon" in this blog for additional information about the battle described in Alma chapter 2. Criterion 5 satisfied.

6. Overlaying our map of the local lands of Zarahemla and Minon with EAAMS data, we count 7 known archaeological sites in Minon and 45 in Zarahemla.
Known Archaeological Sites in our Zarahemla and Minon
It seems clear that the plains and the area around Palenque were more heavily populated in antiquity than the highlands immediately south of the piedmont zone. Criterion 6 satisfied.

7. On our map, the southern boundaries of the lands of Minon, Gideon, Ammonihah and Sidom constitute one of the borders of the greater land of  Zarahemla. Moving upstream from Minon on the Sidon, there is an area outside Nephite control, then the land of Melek, then another area outside Nephite control, and finally the land of Manti, southernmost outpost of the Nephite nation. This map shows the relationships:
Borders of the greater land of Zarahemla south of proposed
Minon, Gideon, Ammonihah and Sidom
The area we have identified as the borders of the greater land of Zarahemla mentioned in Alma 3:23 is a known border region between Piedras Negras (shown within a black circle indicating an area not under Nephite control) on the south and the related polities of Palenque, Pomona and Chinikiha on the north. All of the archaeological sites (represented as black pyramid icons) on the map above have known pre-classic (Nephite era) occupation layers. The modern east-west boundary between Tabasco, Mexico on the north and Peten, Guatemala on the south is close to the ancient northern edge of the Piedras Negras influence zone.

The region south of our proposed land of Minon is coterminous with the southern border of our greater land of Zarahemla, and this is a known border region from antiquity. Criterion 7 satisfied.

See the blog article entitled "The Usumacinta/Sidon Correlation" point #26 for a linked list of other mapped Book of Mormon toponyms.
--
A side note: I was standing on the Boca del Cerro bridge in 2006 when I took the photograph shown in point #5 above. That bridge was damaged in the massive floods of 2007 and 2008. It carries both road and rail traffic, and is a vital transportation link between Central America and points northward. Here is an aerial photo of the bridge.
Aerial photo of Boca del Cerro Bridge
looking upstream on the Usumacinta

Peripatetic Amlici

$
0
0
I research The Book of Mormon text from 4 different sources:
  • A well-worn printed copy of the 1981 LDS text in a standard triple combination
  • The online 1981 LDS text from lds.org
  • Royal Skousen's 2009 Yale University Press edition, The Book of Mormon: The Earliest Text
  • The 9 large books published to date (volumes 1, 2 in 2 parts & 4 in 6 parts) of Royal Skousen's critical text
Here is a visual of my workstation with all four sources illustrated.
4 complementary sources for researching The Book of Mormon text
The Christus statuette was carved for me by a terrific young LDS sculptor in Cochabamba, Bolivia. When I finally received the finished product, the hands had broken off in shipping. I consider the missing hands an apt metaphor for the role each of us play as we help build up the Kingdom of God upon the earth so the Kingdom of Heaven may come D & C 65:6.

For years, we have wondered who the mysterious dissident Nephite Amalekites were. They are mentioned 19 times in the text in Alma chapters 21 - 27 Alma 21:2 and chapter 43 Alma 43:6 without provenance.  Some characteristics of this bellicose group:
  • They lived among the Lamanites, built religious meeting houses and propounded a concept of deity somewhat more advanced than that held by their neighbors Alma 22:7.
  • Most of them were followers of Nehor Alma 21:4, Alma 24:28, the arch apostate who was executed ca. 91 B.C. for murdering Gideon Alma 1:15.
  • They vigorously opposed the missionary work being done among the Lamanites by Ammon, Aaron, Omner & Himni, the four sons of Mosiah Alma 21:5; the missionaries had almost no success among them Alma 23:14; yet their sanctuaries were often available as preaching venues Alma 21:16 following royal decree Alma 23:2.
  • They were often allied with the Amulonites, descendants of the 24 wicked priests of King Noah Alma 24:1, Alma 24:29.
  • They mixed church and state to such a profound degree that they took up arms, joined forces militarily with the Lamanites and went to war to effect regime change Alma 24:2 and exterminate humble believers Alma 24:28.
This all sounds like a highland Guatemalan version of the Amlicites and Nehorites in Ammonihah as described in Alma chapters 2 and 8-14. So, you can imagine my excitement when I learned from Royal Skousen's critical text that the word "Amalekites" should actually be "Amlicites" as attested by those fragments that remain of the original  Book of Mormon manuscript. See Royal Skousen, Analysis of Textual Variants of the Book of Mormon (Provo, Utah: FARMS, 2007) Part 3, Discussion of Alma 2:11-12. This makes perfect sense. It explains why Nehor's legacy was so ubiquitous throughout Nephite and Lamanite-controlled territory. It explains why the Amlicites and Lamanites combined forces in a joint military invasion Alma 2:24-25 of the local land of Zarahemla. It explains how secessionist plotting Alma 8:17 could still be alive and well barely five years after a) the death of Amlici Alma 2:31, b) the death of  more than 12,500 Amlicites Alma 2:19, and c) repatriation of Ammonihah back into the Nephite political system Alma 8:12 after Amlici's short-lived and disastrous insurrection. And, it explains why ethnic Lamanites, when they realized they had been goaded by the Amlicites and Amulonites into murdering some of their own brethren, promptly retaliated by sending a military force northward to destroy the city and land of Ammonihah Alma 25:1-2, Nephite headquarters of the apostate and seditious Nehorite movement. Further, this explains what was really going on in the land of Antionum when the Zoramites became Lamanites Alma 43:6 and why the Nephites were so fearful of precisely that outcome Alma 31:4.

Here is a likely brief chronology of Nehor, Amlici and their followers:
  • Prior to 91 B.C., Amlici becomes a disciple of Nehor.
  • Prior to 91 B.C., Amlici leads a group of Nephite dissenters southward, establishes a relationship with the descendants of the priests of King Noah & establishes an institutional presence in the Lamanite lands of Amulon, Helam and Jerusalem Alma 24:1.
  • 91 B.C. The sons of Mosiah2 travel up to the lands of the Lamanites and begin their missionary labors. They are initially attracted to the ex-Nephite Amlicites as potential converts Alma 21:4.
  • 91 B.C. Nehor founds a church in Ammonihah, murders Gideon and is executed Alma 1:15 on orders from Alma2, chief judge of the Nephite nation.
  • 87 B.C. Amlici, now in Ammonihah, assumes leadership of the Nehorite movement among the Nephites, has himself crowned king, collaborates with his colleagues among the Lamanites, and mounts a disastrous joint Lamanite - Amlicite invasion of Zarahemla. Amlici is killed by Alma2 in battle on the west banks of river Sidon Alma 2:1-31.
  • 87 B.C. The term "Amlicite" is firmly established in the greater land of Zarahemla Alma 2:11 as it was earlier in the greater land of Nephi.
  • 81 B.C. Alma2 and Amulek preach to the people of Ammonihah,warn them of impending destruction, and are rejected. Amlicite - Nehorite attitudes still prevail in the land. Alma 15:15.
  • 81 B.C. The Amlicites in the greater land of Nephi take the lead in killing the Anti-Nephi-Lehies Alma 24:28.
  • 81 B.C. Ethnic Lamanites, chagrined that former Nephites have convinced them to slaughter innocent fellow Lamanites, take revenge on the Nephites by invading the greater land of Zarahemla and annihilating the people (Amlicites, Nehorites) in Ammonihah Alma 25:2.
  • 77 B.C. The Amlicites in the greater land of Nephi, angry that their brethren in Ammonihah were eliminated, and that their Lamanite proxies are no longer willing to attack Nephites, again make war on the Anti-Nephi-Lehies Alma 27:2.
  • 74 B.C. Amlicites, now in the land of Antionum with the Zoramites, again form part of a large Lamanite army Alma 43:6 bent on Nephite destruction.
  • 74 B.C. After a courageous fight Alma 43:44, but ultimate defeat by Captain Moroni and his forces south of Manti, the Amlicites are never mentioned again in the Nephite text.
A quick recap of relevant military actions:
  • Amlicites invade the land of Gideon and are defeated ca. 87 B.C.
  • Lamanites + Amlicites invade the local land of Zarahemla and are defeated ca. 87 B.C.
  • Lamanites invade the land of Gideon and are defeated ca. 87 B.C. 
  • Lamanites + Amlicites + Amulonites slaughter Anti-Nephi-Lehies in the local land of Nephi ca. 81 B.C.
  • Lamanites + Amulonites destroy Ammonihah ca. 81 B.C.
  • Lamanites + Amulonites defeated by Captain Zoram & sons south of Manti ca. 81 B.C.
  • Lamanites + Amlicites kill more Anti-Nephi-Lehies in the greater land of Nephi ca. 77 B.C.
  • Lamanites (presumably with Amlicites) invade the greater land of Zarahemla and are defeated in the largest battle ever fought by Lehi's descendants up to that point in time ca. 77 B.C.
  • Lamanites + Amlicites + Zoramites in the land of Antionum consider, then decide against invading the land of Jershon ca. 74 B.C.
  • Lamanites + Amlicites + Zoramites defeated by Captains Lehi & Moroni south of Manti ca. 74 B.C.

Noah

$
0
0
The land of Noah first appears in The Book of Mormon record, ca. 81 B.C.  After obliterating Ammonihah, Lamanite armies made depredations in the land of Noah. Ten years later, ca. 72 B.C., the city and land of Noah again appear in the text, also in the aftermath of a military action aimed at Ammonihah. The numbers 1 - 5 highlighted in aqua below are characteristics of Noah that will help us site it on the modern map.

The land of Noah was reasonably close to 1 the land of Ammonihah. Noah bordered wilderness 2, and the borders of Noah were populated. 3 Noah had a relationship with Manti - they are the only polities in the Nephite domain described as "weak" Alma 43:24, Alma 49:14-15. This implies that Noah and Manti were reasonably close to each other. 4 Noah was between the land of Ammonihah and the local land of Nephi because the Lamanites marauded around Noah as they were returning back from Ammonihah to the local land of Nephi. 5 ...

Linguistic Littorals

$
0
0
Comparative linguists identify six major language families in Mesoamerica:
  • Chibchan (spoken in the Isthmo - Colombian region from Honduras on the north to Colombia on the south)
  • Mayan
  • Mixe-Zoquean (probably the language of the Olmec)
  • Oto-Manguean (Mixtec, Zapotec)
  • Totonacan (may be part of the Mixe-Zoque family)
  • Uto-Aztecan (Nahuatl)
This is still a fertile field of inquiry which means this list is subject to change. For example, some linguists think Proto Mayan and Mixe-Zoquean both derive from a common ancestral tongue.

We will focus on southern Mesoamerica, south of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. This language map is the current version of the historical-comparative linguistic work that was summarized in the Handbook of Middle American Indians published by the University of Texas in the 1960's and '70's.
Mesoamerican language distribution at European contact.
This shows the spatial distribution of the various native languages and language families just before the Spanish conquest. The Mayan area is outlined in red (including the Huastec dialect around El Tajin in northern Veracruz). The Nahuatl areas reflect late post classic incursions by the Aztec empire. The Mixe, Zoque and Popolucan areas are thought to be linguistic holdovers from the ancient Olmec. Chiapanec is closely related to the Zapotec still spoken in Oaxaca today.

This map shows the contemporary distribution of Mayan dialects in southern Mesoamerica.
Distribution of Mayan dialects in southern Mesoamerica today.

And this map shows the approximate extent of the Maya world in preclassic times with early sites shown. The orange lines are the approximate boundaries of the a) northern lowland Maya in Yucatan, b) southern lowland Maya in Belize, Campeche and Peten, and c) highland Maya in highland Guatemala. The circle is the area generally thought of as the cradle of Maya civilization, centered on the Mirador Basin in northern Peten. Are there other preclassic Maya sites? Yes. Hundreds of them, many still unknown to science. The locations shown as black pyramid icons on the map below are simply a handful of preclassic Maya sites that have come to our attention because of their location or some salient characteristic.
Preclassic Maya World.
Now, we will add Chiapa de Corzo, the quintessential Zoque site; the area known as "La Frailesca," a major Zoque region in preclassic times; and preclassic Zoque sites (red pyramid icons) identified by NWAF archaeologists Gareth W. Lowe and Bruce R. Bachand.
Preclassic Maya and Zoque Worlds
Notice the distinct line of demarcation between the Maya and Zoque worlds. It is the Mezcalapa-Grijalva River. The river is a major linguistic boundary. That was true in preclassic times. It was true at European contact. And, it is true today.

Let's focus in on the Zoque area to see its direct link to the earlier, larger Olmec civilization. Recognized Olmec or Olmec-influenced sites are shown as orange pyramid icons.
Preclassic Olmec, Zoque and Maya Worlds.
From the map above, it is clear that the Olmec and Zoque overlapped to a large degree. Many sites are in both groups. Zoque civilization was a late, regional expression of Olmec.

This map shows the approximate extent of Zoque influence (blue shaded polygon) during Chiapa de Corzo's apogee ca. 1,000 B.C. to 400 B.C. according to Bruce R. Bachand.
Zoque area of influence at Chiapa de Corzo apogee.
Notice how the line of demarcation in this early (middle preclassic) era was the Usumacinta River. The map above is slightly misleading in two ways. 1) It shows Zoque influence before 400 B.C. (middle preclassic) while many of the Maya sites (black pyramid icons) date to the late preclassic (400 B.C. to A.D. 200). And, 2) Chiapa de Corzo is shown in the same size font as El Mirador. In reality, Chiapa de Corzo at apogee was orders of magnitude smaller (70 hectares) than El Mirador at apogee (2,000+ hectares). See the blog article "Site Sizes" for context around these metrics.

After 400 B.C., the Zoque area contracted rapidly while the Maya area expanded to fill the vacuum. Zoque influence became regionalized to the area south and west of the Mezcalapa-Grijalva River while Maya influence pushed west of the Usumacinta. During the late preclassic, the Maya linguistic and cultural area assumed roughly the shape and extension it occupies today, and it has remained remarkably stable ever since with some incursions (Teotihuacan, Toltecs, Aztecs) and forays into central Mexico (Cacaxtla in the state of Tlaxcala) and northern Veracruz (Huastec El Tajin).

Two candidates for the city of Zarahemla.
Some implications for The Book of Mormon:
  • The Olmec - Jaredite correlation continues to work pretty well. Zoque as a late, regional expression of Olmec fits the pattern. The Olmec collapase ca. 400 B.C. was roughly coterminous with the Zoque collapse.
  • The epi-Olmec phenomenon in the Papaloapan River basin and the Tuxtlas (ca. 300 B.C. to A.D. 250) also had an analogue in the Zoque area of Chiapas south and west of the Mezcalapa-Grijalva River.
  • The mass migration from the land of Nephi to Zarahemla under Mosiah1 occurred about 200 B.C. By that time, the Mezcalapa-Grijalva had largely assumed its long-running position as the linguistic littoral between the Maya and non-Maya worlds.
  • The leading candidate for the city of Zarahemla in the Mezcalapa-Grijalva/Sidon correlation, Santa Rosa, lies right on the linguistic boundary. The leading candidate for the city of Zarahemla in the Usumacinta/Sidon correlation, Nueva Esperanza II, lies squarely within Maya territory.
  • To poorly paraphrase Shakespeare, "To be or not to be Maya, that is the question." Hamlet Act 3 Scene 1.

The East Seacoast Cities of the Nephites

$
0
0

The East Seacoast Cities of the Nephites

The land that we understand was settled by the Nephites, Lamanites, and Mulekites was essentially separated into two main areas, both of which are in the land southward as mentioned in the text.
The first is the land of Zarahemla, which is mentioned in the Book of Mormon text in three different ways:
1- The local land of Zarahemla, which is similar to a county in a particular state of the United States, with its associated county seat.  The city of Zarahemla was also the capital city of the Nephite nation for most of the timeline of the Book of Mormon (Omni 1:13;Alma 5:1).
2- The somewhat larger land of Zarahemla, which extended from the east sea (Gulf of Honduras) to the west sea (Pacific Ocean), and from the narrow strip of wilderness (Cuchumatanes and Sierra de las Minas) mountain ranges on the south to the land of Bountiful on the north (Alma 22:29).  The southern border of the land Bountiful and the northern border of Zarahemla is ill-defined and ambiguous and possibly contained only one city that is mentioned in the text, the city of Bountiful (Alma 22:29-33).
3- The greater land of Zarahemla included the land of Bountiful, which abutted the land of Desolation on the north at the narrow neck of land (as well as the shore of the Gulf of Mexico), and which also extended from the east sea to the west sea (Mosiah 25:10, 23; 27:35; 29:44)
The greater land of Zarahemla also included an un-named land between the larger land of Zarahemla and the land of Bountiful.  The river Sidon essentially flowed through the center of this greater land, running from its source in the mountainous narrow strip of wilderness to its mouth to the north of the land of Bountiful, emptying into the Gulf of Mexico. The principal nation of the Nephites was the greater land of Zarahemla (3 Nephi 3:23).

The   second main area is known as the greater land of Nephi. The narrow strip of wilderness is the Cuchumatanes and Sierra de las Minas range that ran from the east sea (Gulf of Honduras) to the west sea (Pacific Ocean) and separated the Nephite nation (the lowlands of Guatemala, Belize, and Chiapas, Tabasco, and Campeche states of present-day Mexico from the Lamanites, the land of Nephi, living mostly in the highlands of Guatemala (Alma 22:27).  The extent southward into Central America of the Lamanite hegemony is unknown.  The Nephite record keepers never mentioned any territory south of the land of Nephi in the highlands.
Some scholars and researchers have wondered why the Lamanites, if their inhabitable territory was too small for their enlarging population didn’t simply move south into the areas that are now known as El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and even Panama.  Some have speculated that the inhabitants of some of those areas were more belligerent and hostile than even the Lamanites, so, rather than contend with those peoples, it was easier to fight with and encroach upon the more pacific Nephites to the north, to which they already had an undying hatred.  Other researchers have also speculated that until the change in topography at the time of the Savior’s crucifixion, the lowlands of Nicaragua were such that there was a fairly wide and deep channel of water, essentially affirming Mormon’s comment that the lands of Nephi and Zarahemla were nearly surrounded by water (Alma 22:32).

With regard to the greater land of Zarahemla, there were many smaller lands that are named in the text similar to the city-states that were known to exist among the Maya population at about the same time period.  For most of the Book of Mormon, these lands were all part of the Nephite nation and were subject to the kingships of Mosiah1, Benjamin, and Mosiah2; and subsequently to the system of judges beginning with Alma2, the first chief judge.  It appears that most of the time these smaller lands were discussed as both a land and a central city--essentially like a city in the agrarian past of the United States with a central business and residential location surrounded by farms, pastures, and ranches.  Occasionally, a certain land was mentioned without a corresponding city; and at times a city was identified without the mention of an associated land.  This may have simply been the record-keepers’ shorthand (or possibly omission) but the suggestion is that probably all the local cities had their surrounding lands of the same name.

Of particular interest is the string of Nephite cities along the east coast of the greater land of Zarahemla. In approximately 72 BC, the Nephites began the foundation of a city near the seashore just north of the Lamanite territory, called Moroni (Alma 50:13).  There may have been a natural feature, such as a river, stream, tidal inlet, etc., that would have separated the land and city of Moroni in this land of Zarahemla from the Lamanite territory of the greater land of Nephi; and that this city/land of Moroni was the first of many Nephite cities that would be fortified against a future Lamanite attack.  Such an attack occurred about 67 BC when Amalickiah’s armies overcame the Nephite defenses and conquered the city (Alma 51:22-24).

Another new city/land in the same general area in 72 BC was that of Nephihah, situated inland from the city/land of Moroni, and between Moroni and an already-existing city called Aaron (Alma 50:14).  Some years earlier (82 BC), Alma2left the city of Ammonihah and began a journey to the city of Aaron, although he didn’t travel far before being told by an angel to return to Ammonihah (Alma 8:13).  If we understand that Ammonihah was in the more central parts of the greater land of Zarahemla, the city of Aaron would have been in the area that was referred to as the east wilderness (Alma 50:9).  When the city/land of Nephihah was laid out, we are informed that it joined the borders of both the cities/lands of Aaron and Moroni (Alma 50:14).  This would suggest that each of these three lands, with their associated cities, were something on the order of five to ten miles in diameter and connected one to another.  One could imagine that the cities of Ammonihah, Aaron, Nephihah, and Moroni were essentially in a straight line, although the distance from Ammonihah to Aaron is never given nor implied.  It probably was several days’ worth of travel.  The text never mentions the city of Aaron after 71 BC.  It may have been too remote to be captured by invading Lamanites.
The city/land of Nephihah was apparently just far enough inland that the Lamanite army that had just conquered the city/land of Moroni bypassed it on the way to the next city/land of Lehi northward along the coast and adjoining the city/land of Moroni (Alma 51:25).  Many of the refugees from the city of Moroni managed to escape to the city of Nephihah, which suggests that there was not a long distance between the two cities (Alma 51:24).

The polity known as the land of Lehi does not mention the word ‘city.’  This is undoubtedly because of the contention that developed by the inhabitants of the land of Morianton, which lay immediately to the north of the land of Lehi, and also along the coast (Alma 50:25).  The citizens of Morianton disputed the boundary between their two lands, indicating that the lands abutted one another in 68 BC (Alma 50:26).  If each of the lands surrounding their central cities were ten miles in diameter and the lands came together, it would suggest that the city centers were only ten miles apart.  The rapidity with which the Lamanite armies conquered the eastern seashore cities also suggests that the distance between the land of Lehi was not very far from the land of Moroni.

The next city/land to the north of Morianton was that of Omner.  This location is mentioned only once, as a victim of the Lamanite incursion along the eastern seacoast in 67 BC (Alma 51:26).  Interestingly, Mormon enumerates the cities that were conquered by the invading hordes of Lamanites, city by city, including the city of Nephihah but makes a scribal error, as he includes the city of Nephihah, which in Alma 51:25 he states that the Lamanites left the city of Nephihah alone in their raiding up the coast.

The city/land of Gid appears to be the next city going northward up the coast.  Mormon mentions Gid as having been captured by the Lamanite army in 67 BC (Alma 51:26).  By 63 BC, the city is retaken by Nephite forces by stratagem, as the Nephite armies under General Moroni begin to defeat the Lamanites and recover their lands (Alma 55:7-26).

The city/land of Mulek is the northernmost of this string of seacoast cities and is just south of the city of Bountiful.  The Lamanite armies captured the city/land of Mulek in 67 BC (Alma 51:26) and were preparing to go against the city Bountiful, thence to the narrow passage, which led to the land northward.  They were stopped, however, by General Teancum and forced to retain the city of Mulek (Alma 52:2).  By 65 BC, Moroni, Teancum, and Lehi find a way to decoy the Lamanite armies ensconced in the city of Mulek by having them chase Teancum’s forces along the seashore heading toward the city Bountiful.  Moroni then captures the unguarded city Mulek; and Teancum leads the Lamanite army northward almost to the city Bountiful where they suddenly meet the fresh Nephite forces under Lehi, who then chase them back to the city Mulek, which has been captured by Moroni (Alma 52:16-34).  The tired Lamanite army then surrenders to Moroni and the Nephites.  This whole event, going from the city of Mulek almost to the city of Bountiful and back, takes less than a day, which shows that the cities of Mulek and Bountiful are not very far apart – something in the order of 8-15 miles.

By 61 BC, General Moroni, with assistance from Chief Judge Pahoran and the loyal Nephite armies, had retaken all the cities previously lost to the Lamanites beginning at the city/land of Mulek southward to the city/land of Moroni, including the city/land of Nephihah.  Interestingly, the recapture of the city of Omner is not mentioned although it had to have been retaken in turn between the cities of Gid and Morianton (Alma 62:18-34).

This account of the Nephite/Lamanite warring and movements along the eastern seacoast infers that the cities/lands were fairly close to one another, each city/land pair being not more than 10-20 miles apart.  If we assume that the eastern seacoast of the Book of Mormon is along the coast of what is now Belize, perhaps there are some sites and ruins that can be seen and possibly identified that would corroborate with the Book of Mormon text.  Indeed, there are several such ruins north of Belize City known nowadays by such names as Potts Landing, Little Rocky Point, Condemned Point, Rocky Point, Sarteneja, and a major ruin called Cerros, among others.


Book of Mormon References -- Eastern Seashore Cities in the Greater Land of Zarahemla

Land of Moroni – all scriptures
Al. 51:22 – Lamanites came into land of Moroni, which was in the borders by the seashore. (67 BC)
Al. 62:25 - Armies of Nephites within the walls of city of Nephihah, Moroni took prisoners and the rest of the Lamanites fled to the land of Moroni, which was in the borders by the seashore. (60 BC)
Al. 62:32 – Lamanites fled from generals Lehi and Teancum, even down upon the borders by the seashore, until they came to the land of Moroni. (60 BC)
Al. 62:33 – And the armies of the Lamanites were all gathered together, insomuch that they were all in one body in the land of Moroni.  Now Ammoron, the king of the Lamanites, was also with them. (60 BC)
Al. 62:34 – Moroni, Lehi, and Teancum encamped with their armies round about in the borders of the land of Moroni, insomuch that the Lamanites were encircled about in the borders by the wilderness on the south, and in the borders by the wilderness on the east. (60 BC)
City of Moroni – all scriptures
Al. 50:13 – Nephites began the foundation of a city, and they called the name of the city Moroni, at it was by the east sea, and it was on the south by the line of the possessions of the Lamanites. (72 BC)
Al. 50:14 – And they also began a foundation for a city between the city of Moroni and the city of Aaron, joining the borders of Aaron and Moroni, and they called the name of the city, or the land, Nephihah. (72 BC)
Al. 51:23 – And it came to pass that the Nephites were not sufficiently strong in the city of Moroni, therefore Amalickiah did drive them slaying many.  And it came to pass that Amalickiah took possession of the city, yea, possession of all their fortifications. (67 BC)
Al. 51:24 – And those who fled out of the city of Moroni came to the city of Nephihah, and also the people of the city of Lehi gathered themselves together, and made preparations and were ready to receive the Lamanites to battle. (67 BC)
Al. 59:5 - … the people of Nephihah, who were gathered together from the city of Moroni and the city of Lehi and the city of Morianton, were attacked by the Lamanites. (62 BC)
3 Nep. 8:9 – And the city of Moroni did sink into the depths of the sea, and the inhabitants thereof were drowned. (AD 34)
3 Nep. 9:4 – And behold that great city Moroni have I caused to be sunk in the depths of the sea, and the inhabitants thereof to be drowned. (AD 34)
Plains of Moroni – no passages

Land of Nephihah – all scriptures
Al. 50:14 - And they also began a foundation for a city between the city of Moroni and the city of Aaron, joining the borders of Aaron and Moroni, and they called the name of the city, or the land, Nephihah. (72 BC)
Al. 62:14 – And it came to pass that Moroni and Pahoran, leaving a large body of men in the land of Zarahemla, took their march with a large body of men towards the land of Nephihah, being determined to overthrow the Lamanites in that city. (61 BC)
Al. 62:18 – After capturing a large body of Lamanites, many were covenanted and were sent to live with the people of Ammon.  And it came to pass that when they had sent them away they pursued their march towards the land of Nephihah.  And it came to pass that when they had come to the city of Nephihah, they did pitch their tents in the plains of Nephihah, which is near the city of Nephihah. (61 BC)
Al. 62:30 – Now it came to pass that Moroni, after he had obtained possession of the city of Nephihah, having taken many prisoners, which did reduce the armies of the Lamanites exceedingly, and having regained many of the Nephites who had been taken prisoners, which did strengthen the army of Moroni exceedingly, therefore Moroni went forth from the land of Nephihah to the land of Lehi. (61 BC)
City of Nephihah – all scriptures
Al. 50:14 - And they also began a foundation for a city between the city of Moroni and the city of Aaron, joining the borders of Aaron and Moroni, and they called the name of the city, or the land, Nephihah.  (City of Aaron is farther inland than city of Nephihah.) (72 BC)
Al. 51:24 - And those who fled out of the city of Moroni came to the city of Nephihah, and also the people of the city of Lehi gathered themselves together, and made preparations and were ready to receive the Lamanites to battle. (67 BC)
Al. 51:25 – But it came to pass that Amalickiah would not suffer the Lamanites to go against the city of Nephihah to battle, but kept them down by the seashore, leaving men in every city to maintain and defend it. (67 BC)
Al. 51:26 – And thus he went on, taking possession of many cities, the city of Nephihah, and the city of Lehi, and the city of Morianton, and city of Omner, and the city of Gid, and city of Mulek, all of which were on the east borders by the seashore. (A mistake, because in v. 25, he bypassed the city of Nephihah. Further, city of Nephihah was farther inland from the seacoast.) (67 BC)
Al. 56:25 – Neither durst they (Lamanites) march down against the city of Zarahemla, neither durst they cross the head of Sidon, over to the city of Nephihah. (65 BC) (Helaman writing here.)
Al. 59:9 – And now as Moroni had supposed that there should be men sent to the city of Nephihah, to the assistance of the people to maintain that city, and knowing that it was easier to keep the city from falling into the hands of the Lamanites than to retake it from them, he supposed that they would easily maintain that city. (62 BC)
Al. 59:11 – And now, when Moroni saw that the city of Nephihah was lost he was exceedingly sorrowful, and began to doubt, because of the wickedness of the people, whether they should not fall into the hands of their brethren (Lamanites). (62 BC)
Al. 62:18 - After capturing a large body of Lamanites, the Lamanites covenanted and were sent to live with the people of Ammon.  And it came to pass that when they had sent them away they pursued their march towards the land of Nephihah.  And it came to pass that when they had come to the city of Nephihah, they did pitch their tents in the plains of Nephihah, which is near the city of Nephihah. (61 BC)
Al. 62:26 – Thus had Moroni and Pahoran obtained the possession of the city of Nephihah without the loss of one soul, and there were many of the Lamanites who were slain. (61 BC)
Al. 62:30 - Now it came to pass that Moroni, after he had obtained possession of the city of Nephihah, having taken many prisoners, which did reduce the armies of the Lamanites exceedingly, and having regained many of the Nephites who had been taken prisoners, which did strengthen the army of Moroni exceedingly, therefore Moroni went forth from the land of Nephihah to the land of Lehi. (61 BC)
Plains of Nephihah – all scriptures
Al. 62:18 - After capturing a large body of Lamanites, the Lamanites covenanted and were sent to live with the people of Ammon.  And it came to pass that when they had sent them away they pursued their march towards the land of Nephihah.  And it came to pass that when they had come to the city of Nephihah, they did pitch their tents in the plains of Nephihah, which is near the city of Nephihah. (61 BC)

Land of Lehi – all scriptures
Al. 50:25 – Contention between the people of the land of Lehi, and the land of Morianton, which joined upon the borders of Lehi, both of which were on the borders by the seashore. (68 BC)
Al. 50:26 – The people in the Land of Morianton did claim a part of the land of Lehi, contention arose, and the people of Morianton were determined to slay the people of land of Lehi. (68 BC)
Al. 50:27 – But behold, the people who possessed the land of Lehi fled to the camp of Moroni, and appealed unto him for assistance, for behold they were not in the wrong. (People of Morianton were brought back to land of Morianton and both peoples were restored to their lands, after Morianton was killed.) (68 BC)
Al. 62:30 - Now it came to pass that Moroni, after he had obtained possession of the city of Nephihah, having taken many prisoners, which did reduce the armies of the Lamanites exceedingly, and having regained many of the Nephites who had been taken prisoners, which did strengthen the army of Moroni exceedingly, therefore Moroni went forth from the land of Nephihah to the land of Lehi. (61 BC)
City of Lehi – no passages
Plains of Lehi – no passages

Land of Morianton – all scriptures
Al. 50:25 – Contention between the people of the land of Lehi, and the land of Morianton, which joined upon the borders of Lehi, both of which were on the borders by the seashore. (68 BC)
Al. 50:26 – The people in the Land of Morianton did claim a part of the land of Lehi, contention arose, and the people of Morianton were determined to slay the people of land of Lehi. (68 BC)
Al. 50:36 – The people of Morianton were brought back, and covenanted to keep the peace and they were restored to the land of Morianton, and a union took place between them and the people of Lehi, and they were also restored to their lands. (68 BC)
City of Morianton – all scriptures
Al. 51:26 - And thus he went on, taking possession of many cities, the city of Nephihah, and the city of Lehi, and the city of Morianton, and city of Omner, and the city of Gid, and city of Mulek, all of which were on the east borders by the seashore. (A mistake, because in v. 25, he bypassed the city of Nephihah.) (67 BC)
Al. 59:5 – While Moroni was making preparations to go against the Lamanites to battle, behold, the people of Nephihah, who were gathered together from the city of Moroni and the city of Lehi and the city of Morianton, were attacked by the Lamanites. (62 BC)
Plains of Morianton – no passages

Land of Omner – no passages
Plains of Omner – no passages
City of Omner – all scriptures
Al. 51:26 – And thus he (Amalickiah) went on, taking possession of many cities, the city of Nephihah, and the city of Lehi, and the city of Morianton, and city of Omner, and the city of Gid, and city of Mulek, all of which were on the east borders by the seashore. (A mistake, because in v. 25, he bypassed the city of Nephihah.) (67 BC) [The retaking of Omner by the Nephites is never mentioned.]

Land of Gid – no passages
Plains of Gid – no passages
City of Gid – all scriptures
Al. 51:26 - And thus he (Amalickiah) went on, taking possession of many cities, the city of Nephihah, and the city of Lehi, and the city of Morianton, and city of Omner, and the city of Gid, and city of Mulek, all of which were on the east borders by the seashore. (A mistake, because in v. 25, he bypassed the city of Nephihah.) (67 BC)
Al. 55:7 – Now the Nephites were guarded in the city of Gid, therefore Moroni appointed Laman and caused that a small number of men should go with him.  (Laman gets the Lamanite guards drunk.) (63 BC)
Al. 55:16 – And now this was according to the design of Moroni.  And Moroni had prepared his men with weapons of war, and he went to the city Gid while the Lamanites were in a deep sleep and drunken, and cast in weapons of war unto the prisoners, insomuch that they were all armed.  Nephites captured the city of Gid without a struggle. (63 BC)
Hel. 5:15 – Helaman’s sons, Lehi and Nephi, went from city to city, starting at Bountiful, thenceforth to the city of Gid, and from the city of Gid to the city of Mulek. (30 BC)

Plains of Mulek – no passages  (But see Al. 52:20 below.)
Land of Mulek – no passages specifically of this title
City of Mulek – all scriptures
Al. 51:26 - And thus he (Amalickiah) went on, taking possession of many cities, the city of Nephihah, and the city of Lehi, and the city of Morianton, and city of Omner, and the city of Gid, and city of Mulek, all of which were on the east borders by the seashore. (A mistake, because in v. 25, he bypassed the city of Nephihah.) (67 BC)
Al. 52:2 – The Lamanites abandoned their design in marching into the land northward, and retreated with all their army into the city of Mulek, and sought protection in their fortifications. (66 BC)
Al. 52:16 – Teancum receives orders to attack the city of Mulek, and retake it if it were possible. (65 BC)
Al. 52:17 – Teancum sees that his army can’t retake the city of Mulek, so retreats back to city Bountiful. (65 BC)
Al. 52:19 – Moroni and Teancum hold a war council on how to retake the city of Mulek. (65 BC)
Al. 52:20 – Jacob, commander of Lamanites in city of Mulek, will not come out to battle on the plains between the cities of Mulek and Bountiful. (65 BC)
Al. 52:22 – Teancum takes part of his army to the wilderness, which is to the west of city of Mulek.
            (65 BC)
Al. 52:23-26 – Moroni retakes the city of Mulek. (65 BC)
Al. 52:28-34– Lamanites pursue Teancum till they come close to city Bountiful (probably not more than 10 miles), when they meet the army of Lehi, and hasten back to city of Mulek, not knowing that city Mulek had fallen to Moroni’s army. (65 BC)
Al. 53:2 – Moroni takes command of city of Mulek and hands it over to Lehi. (64 BC)
Al. 53:6 – City of Mulek had been one of the strongest held Lamanite cities (after taking it from the Nephites).  Moroni’s armies had beaten one of the strongest Lamanite armies and had retaken the city of Mulek. (64 BC)
Hel. 5:15 – Helaman’s sons, Lehi and Nephi, went from city to city, starting at Bountiful, thenceforth to the city of Gid, and from the city of Gid to the city of Mulek. (30 BC)

Plains of Bountiful – no passages  (But see Al. 52:20 above.)

Land of Aaron – no passages
Plains of Aaron – no passages
City of Aaron – all scriptures
Al. 8:13 – Alma leaves the city of Ammonihah and begins a journey toward the city of Aaron. (82  BC)
Al. 50:14 - And they also began a foundation for a city between the city of Moroni and the city of Aaron, joining the borders of Aaron and Moroni, and they called the name of the city, or the land, Nephihah.  (City of Aaron is farther inland than city of Nephihah.  Ammonihah, Aaron, Nephihah, and Moroni could all be in roughly a straight line.) (71  BC)

All references to Narrow, Small, Neck, Pass, and Passage

$
0
0

Narrow, Small, Neck, Pass, and Passage

Narrow pass and Narrow passage

Al. 50:34 – Teancum stops Morianton and people before reaching the narrow pass, which led by the sea into the land northward, yea, by the sea, on the west and on the east. (67 BC)
Al. 52:9 – Moroni has Teancum fortify the land Bountiful, and secure the narrow pass, which led into the land northward, lest the Lamanites should obtain that point and should have power to harass them on every side. (66 BC)
Mormon 2:29 – Lamanites gave the Nephites the land northward, yea, even to the narrow passage, which led into the land southward.  Lamanites get all the land southward. (AD 350)
Mormon 3:5 – And it came to pass that I (Mormon) did cause my people that they should gather themselves together at the land Desolation, to a city which was in the borders, by the narrow pass, which led into the land southward. (AD 360)


Small neck

Al.22:32 – 1-1/2 day’s journey from the east to the west sea, . . . there being a small neck of land between the land northward and the land southward. (90-77 BC) (Sounds like an isthmus to me.)


Narrow neck

Al. 63:5 – Hagoth launches his ship into the west sea, by the narrow neck, which led into the land northward. (55 BC)
Eth. 10:20 - Jaredites built a great city by the narrow neck of land, by the place where the sea divides the land.

Other Peoples in the Promised Land

$
0
0

Other Peoples in the Promised Land
            The Book of Mormon never states or even infers that the various groups of people mentioned in its pages were the only peoples living in the Americas during the time period of approximately 2500 BC to 300 BC during the Jaredite period; or from 590 BC to 421 AD during the Nephite/Lamanite period.  On the contrary, there are numerous suggestions and indications that there were other groups of people with which the main Lehite colony, or its sub-parts, came in contact.  Following are the scriptural references of many passages that suggest or infer the existence of other groups of indigenous peoples.

2 Nep. 1:5-11 - Other peoples would be led to the Americas.  These could have preceded the Book of Mormon people.

2 Nep. 5:6-9 - All those who would go with Nephi: inferring that there were others besides his own family and those mentioned by name.

2 Nep. 5:15-16 - Within barely 30 years after leaving Jerusalem, the Nephites had built a large temple.  In that short period of time there probably weren’t more than 100 Nephites, many of whom would have been children or teenagers, so the inference is that there must have been many other able-bodied men enough to construct the temple in addition to their own homes.

2 Nep. 5:34 - After only 30 years in the New World (essentially only 40 years since leaving Jerusalem) the Nephites had already had wars with the Lamanites (in only 2 generations); and there would have been only approximately 150 people on each side, hardly enough to be considered having a war unless thousands of indigenous peoples were also involved.

2 Nep. 10:20-22 - Jacob says the Nephites “are upon an isle of the sea.”  (At least it appears to be an island to the Nephites, being surrounded by water.) There are multiple “isles of the sea . . . and they are inhabited also by our brethren.” (Again, not necessarily actual islands.) The Lord has led these other Israelites away from Jerusalem (or Israel/Palestine), possibly to other parts of the New World.
           
2 Nep. 29:7, 12-14 - Lord remembers the seed of Abrahamand will give his word to them. (Wherever they may be.)

Jacob 1:14 - People friendly to Nephi are called Nephites; those who want to destroy the people of Nephi are called Lamanites, not necessarily blood descendants on either side.

Jacob 3:13 - Nephites had become numerous.  This is a general statement but there is a suggestion that more than direct descendants of the Lehite colony were involved.

Jacob 7:1-6 - Sherem had never met Jacob even though the direct descendants of Nephi, Sam, Zoram, Jacob, and Joseph were very few in number, ~ less than 80-100.

Jarom 1:6 - Lamanites were more numerous than Nephites.  Why?  Initially, Laman, Lemuel, 2 sons of Ishmael became Lamanites - 4 groups. Nephi, Sam, Zoram, Jacob, Joseph became Nephites - 4-5 groups. Possibly the Lamanite families were joined by more of the indigenous peoples than were the Nephites.

Mosiah 24:5-7- Groups of Lamanites friendly with each other, yet occasionallyfought among themselvesexcept with their own tribes.

Mosiah 25:3- Lamanites more numerous than Nephites and people of Zarahemla combined. They might have commandeered other indigenous groups south of the narrow strip of wilderness.

Mosiah 25:12- Whenever outsiders joined with Nephites they were called Nephites.

Mosiah 29:44- Reign of judges were established among all the people who were called the Nephites. Inference is that there were other peoples besides the descendants of the Lehite colony.

Alma 3:11 - Whoever didn’t believe in the Lamanite traditions were Nephites, inferring there were others than direct descendants of the Lehite colony.

Alma 3:17- Nephi’s seed is whomever follows him (regardless of lineage).

Alma 7:1, 6- Alma speaks to the people of Gideon “in my language;” possibly inferring that the people of Gideon were of a different lineage and who had learned the Nephite language so he could communicate with them, but that he didn’t know their specific language or dialect. Verse 6 - the Gideonites were not prideful and set upon riches and vain things. They may have been a completely different people than those in Zarahemla, who were prideful and concerned about worldly things, yet all in the Nephite nation.

Alma 17:26 - Lamanitish servants - why this designation if they were not true Lamanites?

Alma 19:16- Abish (secret Church convert) was one of the Lamanitish women.  What is a Lamanitish woman compared to a true Lamanite woman?

Alma 21:2-5; 22:7; 24:1, 28; 27:12; 43:6, 17 - Amalekites. This is a hard-hearted, wicked group of otherwise unidentified people living among the Lamanites in the land of Nephi.  Some LDS scholars (Royal Skousen) think their name was misspelled by Oliver Cowdery when penning the printer's manuscript and they are actually the Amlicites, followers of a Nephite dissenter named Amlici. Amlici himself and many of his followers may also have been other than pure Nephites (See Alma 2:1-38; 3:1-18). The Amalekites were definitly of a different lineage than the Lamanites (See Alma 24:29).

Alma 30:6- Korihor came into the land of Zarahemla. If the “land of Zarahemla” means the entire land, which is the nation of the Nephites, it means that he was a non-Nephite coming from another group of people who were not Nephites.  Some LDS researchers have shown that Korihor is actually a Jaredite name and that he may have been a descendant of some Jaredites who were not involved with the great war that ended the Jaredites as a people.  If the “land of Zarahemla” means the local county-like area immediately around the city of Zarahemla, then Korihor could have been a Nephite (still possibly with Jaredite ancestry) from another land within the greater land of Zarahemla.

Alma 31:35- Many of the Zoramites were brethren of Alma and his missionary group.  This infers that others of the Zoramites, possibly the majority, may have been of a different lineage from the original Lehite colony.  The Zoramites, in general, were dissenters from the Nephites - Alma 31:8.

Alma 43:17- Amalekites are mentioned as dissenters from the Nephites, yet nowhere previously is it mentioned when they dissented, unless they are the Amlicites who did defect and join the Lamanites (See Alma 21:2-5, etc., above).

Alma 50:32- Why was Moroni concerned that the people in the land Bountiful would join with the             rebellious people of the land of Morianton unless they were of a different stock, and prone to be more rebellious themselves than regular (pure) Nephites?

Alma 51:8, 21- The king-men were of high birth.  Where did they come from?  Were they descendants from the people of Zarahemla, thus from Mulek who was of high birth; or were they a completely separate group of people assimilated earlier into the Nephites from a culture that had nobility and high births, and were now becoming disaffected?

Helaman 1:15- Coriantumr2, a defector to the Lamanites, was a direct descendant of the Mulekites. Some of this lineage may not have been happy that their ancestors joined with the Nephites and became subject to subsequent kings who were all pure descendants of Nephi.

3 Nephi 3:9-10- somewhat nebulous - The leaders of the Gadianton band may have been part of the dissenters, like the Amlicites, who felt they should have had more privileges being of noble birth, etc.          

3 Nephi 3:14, 24 - “... all them who were numbered among the Nephites....” (possibly inferring that there were other peoples besides the Nephites and converted Lamanites who were friendly to the Nephite leadership).


3 Nephi 5:20 - Mormon announces to his future readers that he is a pure descendant of Lehi, implying that others in his environment were of mixed ancestry.

3 Nephi 7:2-4, 14 - During the anarchy and the formation of numerous tribal associations before Christ’s comingto America - it would be interesting to know if the tribes that developed were based on prior ethnicity.

4 Nephi 1:10, 23 - The Nephites “multiplied exceedingly fast” - could this have been augmented by many converts from other nearby peoples as well as those who were already Nephites?

Mormon 1:7- Nephites were extremely numerous.  See question immediately above.

Mormon 4:17- “... greatness of number....” - Again, question of natural increase or conscription of other indigenous or other non-Nephite peoples.

Ether 7:11 - “...for the people had become exceeding numerous.”    The time period appears to be between 75 and 150 years after arrival in the new world.  Jared’s and Mahonri’s descendants, along with the other 22 people or couples’ descendants, probably wouldn’t amount to more than 1000 people.  It is difficult to say what “exceeding numerous” means, of course, but if they had assimilated thousands of locals (Olmecs) then there could easily have been a numerous people under the heading of Jaredites.

Ether 7:23 - Prophets were sent by the Lord among them.  Were these prophets literal descendants of the original Jaredite colony who came across the ocean, or were they raised up from indigenous peoples?

Ether 10:1-4- Apparently the famine that came destroyed most of the Jaredites, but in a short time during Shez1's reign “the people began again to spread over all the face of the land.”  Again, this is very general but it could be accounted for by combining with indigenous people.

Ether 10:21- Within 200 - 300 years after Shez’s reign, “the whole face of the land northward was covered with inhabitants.”  Whether this could have been accomplished by direct descendants of  the Jaredite colony alone is questionable, but it could easily have been done by assimilating indigenous (Olmec) peoples.


Bountiful - The Text

$
0
0
The city and land of Bountiful are more challenging than most other geographic referents in The Book of Mormon. 31 verses in the text contain 35 occurrences of the word "Bountiful," always as a toponym.


Bountiful – 31 verses, 35 occurrences (critical text emendations)


1 Nephi 17:5

5 And we did come to the land which we called Bountiful, because of its much fruit and also wild honey; and all these things were prepared of the Lord that we might not perish. And we beheld the sea, which we called Irreantum, which, being interpreted, is many waters.
1 Nephi 17:6
6 And it came to pass that we did pitch our tents by the seashore; and notwithstanding we had suffered many afflictions and much difficulty, yea, even so much that we cannot write them all, we were (was) exceedingly rejoiced when we came to the seashore; and we called the place Bountiful, because of its much fruit.

1 Nephi 17:7

7 And it came to pass that after I, Nephi, had been in the land of ( )Bountiful for the space of many days, the voice of the Lord came unto me, saying: Arise, and get thee into the mountain. And it came to pass that I arose and went up into the mountain, and cried unto the Lord.

 Alma 22:29

29 And also there were (was) many Lamanites on the east by the seashore, whither the Nephites had driven them. And thus the Nephites were nearly surrounded by the Lamanites; nevertheless the Nephites had taken possession of all the northern parts of the land bordering on the wilderness, at the head of the river Sidon, from the east to the west, round about on the wilderness side; on the north, even until they came to the land which they called Bountiful.

Alma 22:31

31 And they came from there up into the south wilderness. Thus the land on the northward was called Desolation, and the land on the southward was called Bountiful, it being the wilderness which is (was) filled with all manner of wild animals of every kind, a part of which had come from the land northward for food.

Alma 22:32

32 And now, it was only the distance of a day and a half’s journey for a Nephite, on the line (between the land)Bountiful and the land Desolation, from the east to the west sea; and thus the land of Nephi and the land of Zarahemla were (was) nearly surrounded by water, there being a small neck of land between the land northward and the land southward.

Alma 22:33

33 And it came to pass that the Nephites had inhabited the land Bountiful, even from the east unto the west sea, and thus the Nephites in their wisdom, with their guards and their armies, had hemmed in the Lamanites on the south, that thereby they should have no more possession on the north, that they might not overrun the land northward.

Alma 27:22

22 And it came to pass that the voice of the people came, saying: Behold, we will give up the land of Jershon, which is on the east by the sea, which joins the land Bountiful, which is on the south of the land Bountiful; and this land Jershon is the land which we will give unto our brethren for an inheritance.

Alma 50:11

11 And thus he cut off all the strongholds of the Lamanites in the east wilderness, yea, and also on the west, fortifying the line between the Nephites and the Lamanites, between the land of Zarahemla and the land of Nephi, from the west sea, running by the head of the river Sidon—the Nephites possessing all the land northward, yea, even all the land which was northward of the land Bountiful, according to their pleasure.

Alma 50:32

32 Now behold, the people who (which) were in the land (of)Bountiful, (-) or rather Moroni, feared that they would hearken to the words of Morianton and unite with his people, and thus he would obtain possession of those parts of the land, which would lay a foundation for serious consequences among the people of Nephi, yea, which consequences would lead to the overthrow of their liberty (-).

Alma 51:28

28 And it came to pass that they marched to the borders of the land Bountiful, driving the Nephites before them and slaying many.

Alma 51:30

30 And it came to pass that he headed Amalickiah also, as he was marching forth with his numerous army that he might take possession of the land Bountiful, and also the land northward.

Alma 51:32

32 And it came to pass that they did harass them, insomuch that they did slay them even until it was dark. And it came to pass that Teancum and his men did pitch their tents in the borders of the land Bountiful; and Amalickiah did pitch his tents in the borders on the beach by the seashore, and after this manner were they driven.

Alma 52:9

9 And he also sent orders unto him that he should fortify the land Bountiful, and secure the narrow pass which led into the land northward, lest the Lamanites should obtain that point and should have power to harass them on every side.

Alma 52:15

15 But behold, it came to pass in the twenty (twentieth) and seventh year of the reign of the judges, that Teancum, by the command of Moroni—who had established armies to protect the south and the west borders of the land, and had begun his march towards the land (of)Bountiful, that he might assist Teancum with his men in retaking the cities which they had lost—

Alma 52:17

17 And it came to pass that Teancum made preparations to make an attack (attackt) upon the city of Mulek, and march forth with his army against the Lamanites; but he saw that it was impossible that he could overpower them while they were in their fortifications; therefore he abandoned his designs and returned again to the city Bountiful, to wait for the coming of Moroni, that he might receive strength to his army.

Alma 52:18

18 And it came to pass that Moroni did arrive with his army at (to) the land of Bountiful, in the latter end of the twenty and seventh year of the reign of the judges over the people of Nephi.

Alma 52:27

27 And it came to pass that the Lamanites did pursue Teancum until they came near the city Bountiful, and then they were met by Lehi and a small army, which had been left to protect the city Bountiful.

Alma 52:39

39 But behold, there were many that would not; and those who would not deliver up their swords were taken and bound, and their weapons of war were taken from them, and they were compelled to march with their brethren forth into the land Bountiful.

Alma 53:3

3 And it came to pass that after the Lamanites had finished burying their dead and also the dead of the Nephites, they were marched back into the land Bountiful; and Teancum, by the orders of Moroni, caused that they should commence (in) laboring in digging a ditch round about the land, or the city, Bountiful.

Alma 53:4

4 And he caused that they should build a breastwork of timbers upon the inner bank of the ditch; and they cast up dirt out of the ditch against the breastwork of timbers; and thus they did cause the Lamanites to labor until they had encircled the city of Bountiful round about with a strong wall of timbers and earth, to an exceeding height (heighth).

Alma 55:26

26 And it came to pass that when he had fortified the city Gid, according to his desires, he caused that his prisoners should be taken to the city Bountiful; and he also guarded that city with an exceedingly (exceeding) strong force.

Alma 63:5

5 And it came to pass that Hagoth, he being an exceedingly (exceeding) curious man, therefore he went forth and built him an exceedingly (exceeding) large ship, on the borders of the land Bountiful, by the land Desolation, and launched it forth into the west sea, by the narrow neck which led into the land northward.

Helaman 1:23

23 And now he did not tarry in the land of Zarahemla, but he did march forth with a large army, even towards the city of Bountiful; for it was his determination to go forth and cut his way through with the sword, that he might obtain the north parts of the land.

Helaman 1:28

28 But when Moronihah had discovered this, he immediately sent forth Lehi with an army round about to head them before they should come to the land Bountiful.

Helaman 1:29

29 And thus he did; and he did (And thus he did) head them before they came to the land Bountiful, and gave unto them battle, insomuch that they began to retreat back towards the land of Zarahemla.

Helaman 4:5

5 And in the fifty and seventh year they did come down against the Nephites to battle, and they did commence the work of death; yea, insomuch that in the fifty and eighth year of the reign of the judges they succeeded in obtaining possession of the land of Zarahemla; yea, and also all the lands, even unto the land which was near the land Bountiful.

Helaman 4:6

6 And the Nephites and the armies of Moronihah were driven even into the land of Bountiful;

Helaman 5:14

14 And they did remember his words; and therefore they went forth, keeping the commandments of God, to teach the word of God among all the people of Nephi, beginning at the city Bountiful;

3 Nephi 3:23

23 And the land which was appointed was the land of Zarahemla, and the land which was between the land (of) Zarahemla and the land Bountiful, yea, to the line which was between (betwixt) the land Bountiful and the land Desolation.

3 Nephi 11:1


And now it came to pass that there were a great multitude gathered together, of the people of Nephi, round about the temple which was in the land Bountiful; and they were marveling and wondering one with another, and were showing (shewing) one to another the great and marvelous change which had taken place.

Bountiful - Context

$
0
0
Bountiful in the Old World had a number of salient characteristics:
Bountiful in the New World had all of these characteristics and more:
    • The Nephites named the land Bountiful Alma 22:29
    • After being forcibly driven from their homes by Lamanite invaders, the Nephites took refuge in Bountiful Helaman 4:6.
    • The text describes fruit Helaman 11:17 in Bountiful, the greater land of Zarahemla, and the greater land of Nephi, these three lands constituting "the whole face of the land" Helaman 11:18 both northward and southward Helaman 11:20 of the narrow strip of wilderness from the sea west to the sea east.
    • Honey is never mentioned in The Book of Mormon in a New World context. However, the study of Maya exchange patterns has identified honey as a significant commercial commodity in antiquity.
    The most important Maya trade goods were animal hides, basalt, cacao, ceramics (pottery), cotton & textiles, feathers, fish, flint, forest products, honey, jade, obsidian, salt, shells, tobacco and tools such as manos and metates. This map shows some of the principal places of origin for major Maya trade goods.
    Principal sources of major Maya trade goods
    Note that one of the major centers of honey production in the Maya economy was the area around Chetumal Bay in present-day Quintana Roo. This area correlates well with The Book of Mormon land of Bountiful as subsequent blog posts will demonstrate.

    Continuing the characteristics of New World Bountiful that correspond with Old World Bountiful:
    • Meat from game animals is attested in the text in both Jaredite Ether 10:21 and Nephite Alma 22:31 times.
    • Bountiful is explicitly described as wilderness Alma 22:31 implying limited human impact.
    • Hagoth's port was in Bountiful Alma 63:5. He built a small fleet of ships Alma 63:7 that carried people, provisions Alma 63:10 and construction grade timber Helaman 3:10 into the land northward.
    • Hagoth's port, obviously, was on the seacoast, in this case the west sea Alma 63:5 by the land Desolation. The land Bountiful also had an east seacoast which the text makes explicit through association with Jershon Alma 27:22 and the city of Mulek Alma 52:17, Alma 51:26. (Note that the city of Nephihah mentioned in Alma 51:26 is a known error in the 1981 LDS text. Royal Skousen emends the unsupportable "Nephihah" to read "Moroni". See the blog article "Scribal Error" for additional information about this and other known errors in the 1981 LDS text. Alma 51:32 describes military action in Bountiful on the east seacoast.  
    • The New World Bountiful was predominantly coastal lowland, but it included or bordered higher elevation territory. We know this because Bountiful which was southward Alma 22:31 bordered the land Desolation which was northward Alma 22:31 and both were by a narrow pass that connected the lands southward and northward. On the Desolation side of this narrow pass, one was already in the land northward so the pass led into the land southward Mormon 3:5. On the Bountiful side of this narrow pass, one was in the land southward so the pass led into the land northward Alma 50:34, Alma 52:9.When the Nephite nation was in its final throes, General Mormon gathered all his people together on the Desolation side of this narrow pass, bordering Bountiful Mormon 3:5. The Lamanites controlled the area southward of the pass Mormon 2:29 which included Bountiful. When the Lamanites were the aggressors, invading Nephite lands, they always came down in elevation Mormon 3:7, Mormon 4:17, Mormon 4:19 to engage the Nephites whose city and land Desolation were near the seacoast Mormon 3:8. On the other hand, when the Nephites went on the offensive contrary to prophetic direction, the text consistently describes them going up in elevation to Lamanite-held territory Mormon 3:10, Mormon 3:14, Mormon 4:1. Therefore, the land Bountiful included or bordered upland territory.
    When we go looking for a place on the map that correlates with the textual description of the west seacoast Bountiful - Desolation border area outlined above, the isthmian Pacific coast of Oaxaca and Chiapas is a good fit. In that area, the Sierra Madre is a high mountainous region very close to any proposed land Bountiful. The map below shows the continental divide in white with a handful of elevations noted.
    Elevations along the isthmian continental divide 
    We find dramatic mountains near the proposed Bountiful in the Old World, and even more dramatic mountains near the proposed Bountiful in the New World.

    Continuing our analysis of the ways New World Bountiful mirrors Old World Bountiful:
    • When Mormon described Nephite-held territory in the land southward at apogee ca. 65 B.C., Bountiful was on the northern frontier of Zarahemla's influence. Lands existed beyond Bountiful where Nephites and former Nephites resided, but they were so remote the Nephite record keepers pay them scant attention Alma 22:29, Alma 50:11, Alma 52:9. People left from Bountiful and were never heard from again Alma 63:8.
    • The greatest revelation in Book of Mormon lands - the personal appearance of the resurrected Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ - was received in Bountiful 3 Nephi 11:1-8.
    • Many ocean-going ships sailed from Hagoth's port in Bountiful Alma 63:5-10.
    Bountiful in Oman and Bountiful in Mexico were both powerful symbols of peace and refuge amid exodus, symbolically linked by a number of shared motifs.

    New World Bountiful was one of four land southward geographic entities that were continental (sea to sea) in scope. The others were the greater lands of Nephi and Zarahemla and the narrow strip of wilderness. Bountiful had spatial relationships with many other Book of Mormon geographic referents highlighted below in yellow.

    Analysis of Alma 22. In this, his principal topographic passage, Mormon describes the Nephite and Lamanite nations as they existed geographically ca. 90 B.C., the time when Ammon was teaching King Lamoni in the land of Ishmael and his brother Aaron was teaching King Lamoni's father in the local land of Nephi. Nephite settlement along the east and west seacoasts of the greater land of Zarahemla had not yet begun in 90 B.C. By ca. 77 B.C. the  land of Jershon, associated with the east sea, appears for the first time in the text. That is followed by many other lands and cities in the ensuing years. By 65 B.C., the greater land of Zarahemla extended from coast to coast. See the blog article "Expansion of the Nephite Nation" for a series of maps showing the growth of the Nephite polity in their golden age.

    Alma 22:27
    • Alma 22:27 the terms all the land, all his people and all his land refer to the greater land of Nephi, those cities and lands subject to King Lamoni's father who was the Lamanite emperor ca. 90 B.C.
    • Alma 22:27 the term all the regions round about also refers to the greater land of  Nephi. Round about in the text describes territory wrapping or people moving in a circular fashion. In this case, the regions round about were part of King Lamoni's father's domain encircling the local land of Nephi Alma 22:1, capital of the Lamanite empire.
    • Alma 22:27 the greater land of Nephi ran in a fairly straight line from the east sea to the west seaAlma 50:8. The east sea was also called the sea on the east and sea east. The west sea was also called the sea on the west and sea west.
    • Alma 22:27 the greater land of Zarahemla was north of the east-west narrow strip of wilderness. The greater land of Nephi was south of the narrow strip of wilderness. The narrow strip of wilderness, like the greater land of Nephi, ran from the east sea to the west sea.
    • Alma 22:27 the western edge of the narrow strip of wilderness curved, following the coastline of the west sea. This is the part of the narrow strip of wilderness that lay round about on the borders of the seashore
    • Alma 22:27 In the area where the narrow strip of wilderness curved, there was also some wilderness west of the greater land of Zarahemla. This wilderness was generally north of the narrow strip of wilderness like the greater land of Zarahemla was north of the narrow strip of wilderness. 
    • Alma 22:27 the narrow strip of wilderness running east-west through the borders of the land of Manti and by the head of river Sidon was the dividing line generally between Nephite held territory on the north and Lamanite lands on the south.
    This one verse, Alma 22:27, is packed with so much spatial detail that many students of the text have difficulty following it without a map. Here is a proposed map showing the relationships. As with all images on this blog, click to enlarge.
    Proposed Alma 22:27 correlation
    When we suggest that the greater land of Zarahemla was south of Bountiful and north of the narrow strip of wilderness as the map above indicates, does this mean the Nephites from their capital city, Zarahemla, ruled all that vast territory? No. The Nephites established outposts with sizable pockets of wilderness between settled areas. So, for example, the map below is identical to the one above except the greater land of Zarahemla is limited to our proposed correlation of those populated lands & cities (not wilderness) mentioned in the text by 81 B.C. See the blog article "Expansion of the Nephite Nation" for a series of maps that plot Nephite growth as they approached apogee. The black circles indicate the Piedras Negras and Altar de Sacrificios areas where it is doubtful the Nephites ever had much more influence than a tense detente during times of peace and avoidance of the region during times of war. And, the circular yellow polygon represents the Mirador Basin area with Calakmul on the north and Tikal on the south. It is unlikely the Nephites had much influence of any kind in this heavily populated and culturally dynamic area.
    Greater land of Zarahemla limited to settlements
    mentioned in the text by 81 B.C.
    There is a great deal of evidence in the text that Nephite "control" over their far-flung territory was tenuous and fleeting. Commander Helaman's lament to his military superior, Captain Moroni, is typical. In Alma 58:32 Helaman opines that Nephite power was weak vis-a-vis the amount of real estate they nominally occupied. Nephite leaders consistently attributed their military success to divine help Alma 49:28, Alma 56:56 because they were always demographically disadvantaged Mosiah 25:3. A well-known example from Mormon history will help illustrate the point. Brigham Young led the vanguard pioneer company from Winter Quarters to the Salt Lake Valley in 1847. Before he died in 1877, the American Moses + Joshua helped found over 400 settlements in what eventually became the states of California, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, and of course, Utah. This map shows the enormous geographic extent of outlying Mormon settlements begun during Brigham Young's lifetime (in the case of Manassa, Colorado, they actually started out in Pueblo).
    Geographic distribution of Mormon settlements begun
    during Brigham Young's lifetime
    The white-shaded polygon on the map above has an area larger than 1 million square kilometers. (By way of comparison, the maximum extent of the Maya area in Mexico, Belize, Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador never exceeded 360,000 square kilometers.) Did the Mormons control that huge territory? Of course not, but Brigham's vision was grander still. The proposed state of Deseret (1849 - 1850) included all of what is today southern California, extended past Crater Lake, Oregon and covered an area larger than 1,230,000 square kilometers. At the time California was admitted to the union as the 31st state on September 9, 1850, the state population stood at 95,000. By Young's death in 1877, the population of California had exploded to approximately 800,000. In contrast, in 1850, according to the Deseret News 2012 Church Almanac there were fewer than 52,000 Latter-day Saints worldwide (many were in Europe). At Brigham Young's death in 1877, that number had grown to 115,000. So, while we admire the sheer audacity of the Utah church's geo-political ambition in the western U.S., in the end their territorial claims proved unsustainable because they lacked the manpower to exert more than marginal influence over the external events swirling around them. Something similar was going on with the Nephites in southern Mesoamerica in the late pre-classic. They bit off much more than they could chew and ultimately, their republic with settlements from sea to sea lasted only a few decades.
        
    Two schools of thought exist among Book of Mormon students regarding the interpretation of Alma 22:27. Most people think the phrase "running from the east towards the west" refers to the same narrow strip of wilderness that is the principal subject of the verse. Others think it refers to the river Sidon. If the river is what Mormon intended, he is probably describing the great bend of the Chixoy which does in fact flow westward for about 25 air kilometers at this point in its course before turning generally northward.
    Close up of proposed Manti - head of Sidon area
    showing east to west river flow
    Alma 22:28
    • Alma 22:28 Culturally benighted Lamanites lived in the wilderness on the west in the land of Nephi. This refers to wilderness by the west seacoast south of the narrow strip of wilderness included as part of the greater land of Nephi. 
    • Alma 22:28 Lamanites also lived in the wilderness west of the greater land of Zarahemla, by the west seacoast. Note the terminology distinction here. This wilderness was not part of the greater land of Zarahemla. In 90 B.C., the Nephites had not yet begun colonization of their east and west seacoasts.
    • Alma 22:28 The wilderness on the west in the land of Nephi was near the land of first inheritance where the Lehites settled immediately after making landfall in the New World. This land of first inheritance was a coastal region, part of the greater land of Nephi.
    • Alma 22:27-28 Four geographic referents formed a corridor along the west seacoast: 1) the land of first inheritance which was part of the greater land of Nephi, 2) the wilderness on the west in the greater land of Nephi, 3) the part of the narrow strip of wilderness that curved round about the borders of the west sea, and 4) the wilderness west of the greater land of Zarahemla.
    This map shows the proposed correlation.
    Proposed Alma 22:27-28 correlation
    Alma 22:29
    • Alma 22:29 By ca. 90 B.C., the Nephites had begun their colonizing push eastward from their traditional homelands along the river Sidon. We know this because the text says they had driven the Lamanites all the way to the east by the seashore.
    • Alma 22:29 With Lamanites in the west sea corridor, all through the greater land of Nephi south of the narrow strip of wilderness, and also along the east sea, the Nephites were surrounded on 3 sides by their enemies.
    This map shows what Mormon may have meant when he said the Nephites were nearly surrounded by the Lamanites. It shows our placement of Nephite cities and lands mentioned in the text by ca. 81 B.C. The heavy black line represents areas inhabited by Lamanites in 90 B.C.
    Nephites in greater Zarahemla nearly surrounded
    by Lamanites ca. 90 B.C.
    Note also the land not under Nephite control in the northern Peten and southern Campeche. It held large numbers of very powerful Lamanites (a Lamanite being any non-Nephite) in the 90 B.C. era. The black line juts into the ocean in Amatique Bay because in 90 B.C. the area that later (ca. 72 B.C.) became the city of Moroni Alma 50:13 had not yet fallen into the sea 3 Nephi 8:9.
    • Alma 22:29 With Lamanites on much of their perimeter, it is easy to understand why the Nephites were so jealous of all the northern parts of the land. This refers to the greater land of Zarahemla which lay north of the narrow strip of wilderness.
    • Alma 22:29 We like V. Garth Norman's suggestion that the head of the river Sidon is the confluence of the Salama with the Chixoy-Negro where they come together to form the Chixoy. The narrow strip of wilderness that runs from the east sea to the west sea is the wilderness at the head of the river Sidon.
    • Alma 22:29 the greater land of Zarahemla extended from the east to the west north of the narrow strip of wilderness. Note the precise language employed here. Greater Zarahemla at this time (ca. 90 B.C.) did not extend from the east sea to the west sea, just from  the east to the west in keeping with the general directional sweep introduced in Alma 22:27.
    • Alma 22:29 There are two possible interpretations of the area round about on the wilderness side on the north. Note that the critical text and the 1981 LDS text have very different punctuation in this phrase. The original Book of Mormon manuscript did not contain punctuation which causes some ambiguity when we connect dependent clauses with their referents. The wilderness side on the north may refer to the boundary between the greater land of Zarahemla and the areas not yet settled by Nephites west, south and east of Nephite territory. If that is correct, Mormon's concept of round about on the wilderness side on the north refers to Nephite territory north of the narrow strip of wilderness.
    The black line on this map shows the correlation if Mormon is referring to the greater land of Zarahamla north of the narrow strip of wilderness surrounded in a circular fashion by non-Nephite wilderness.
    One interpretation of greater Zarahemla's wilderness side
    north of the narrow strip of wilderness
    Another possible interpretation is that the wilderness side on the north is north of the inhabited parts of the greater land of Zarahemla itself. We know that wilderness lay immediately north and west of the local land of Zarahemla. See the blog article entitled "Hermounts." Our correlation puts the local land of Zarahemla in the higher ground south of the permanent flood plain in the Usumacinta delta. There is a distinct line between the higher elevations on the south that receive seasonal flooding near the rivers and lower elevations on the north that are year-round swamps. The black line on the map below shows what Mormon may have meant by wilderness side on the north.
    Another interpretation of greater Zarahemla's wilderness side
    north of the inhabited parts of Zarahemla itself 
    • Alma 22:29 In any event, the Nephites possessed the greater land of Zarahemla from the narrow strip of wilderness on the south to the land Bountiful on the north. 
    Alma 22:30
      • Alma 22:30 The land Bountiful shared a border with the land Desolation.
      • Alma 22:30 In Nephite affairs ca. 90 B.C., the land Bountiful was on the northern frontier of their terra cognita. Beyond Bountiful, even further northward, lay the land Desolation where the once populous Jaredite nation had fallen. Like Bountiful, Desolation was a symbolic idea as well as a bounded extension of territory. The ancient bones Mormon refers to were mentioned in Mosiah 8:8 and Mosiah 21:26. The mention in Omni 1:22 comes from the small plates of Nephi which Mormon had not yet incorporated into his record when he was abridging the book of Alma.
      • Alma 22:30 the land which had been peopled and had been destroyed refers to a political entity that vanished rather than enduring terra firma.
      • Alma 22:30 The land Desolation where the Jaredite nation met its end was discovered by the people of Zarahemla, commonly known as Mulekites. Mulek and his ocean-going emigrant party made their first landing in Desolation Helaman 6:10.
      Alma 22:31
      • Alma 22:31 After crossing the Atlantic Ocean, the Mulekites made landfall in the land northward but they didn't remain there very long. The land northward was also called the land on the northward, the land which was northward, the land north and simply the north.
      • Alma 22:31 The Mulekites, aka the people of Zarahemla, traveled southward from their first landing point up into the south wilderness. The word up means they rose in elevation. Their most likely route into the wilderness was to sail upstream on a large river in the same water craft they had used to cross the ocean.
      • Alma 22:31 The south wilderness where the Mulekites settled permanently was the land southward. The land southward was also called the land on the southward, the land south, and simply the south. 
      • Alma 22:31 The land Desolation, southernmost entity in the land northward, symbolically represented  and sometimes eponymously referred to the entire land northward. Another symbolic name for the land northward was Muloch (critical text orthography) Helaman 6:10. The land Bountiful, northernmost entity in the land southward, symbolically represented and sometimes eponymously referred to the entire land southward. Another symbolic name for the land southward was Lehi Helaman 6:10.
      • Alma 22:31 The land southward, aka south wilderness, had an abundance of game animals while the land northward in former times had supported large human populations Mosiah 8:8Ether 10:21.
      Alma 22:32
        • Alma 22:32 Along the west seacoast, there was an east-west line between the land Bountiful and the land Desolation. We have previously established that the standard unit of measure for Nephite distance, one day's travel, was approximately 15 straight-line kilometers. See the blog article entitled "Land Southward Travel Times." This line between the land Bountiful and the land Desolation was 1.5 day's travel in length, about 22 - 23 air kilometers. 
        • Alma 22:32 The line between Bountiful on the south and Desolation on the north began at some unspecified point in the east and terminated at the west sea.
        This map shows the area within Mesoamerica where the textual description of the east-west Bountiful-Desolation line makes sense. We have activated the Google Maps terrain layer and superimposed our plots of Mesoamerican rivers. Rivers traced in red form the Usumacinta drainage. Rivers traced in blue are part of the Mezcalapa-Grijalva drainage as that river ran in early Nephite times. (See the blog article "Wandering River" for clarification on this point.) All other river systems are traced in yellow. How adequate are our river data? Woefully incomplete. Our maps are still missing many important streams. Tracing rivers in Google Earth is very time-consuming. The rivers we do currently show on maps represent a time investment of several thousand hours. We have begun the lengthy process of mapping Mesoamerican river systems because we believe accurate maps of rivers and mountains are fundamental to viable Book of Mormon geographic correlations. On the map below, the black line represents the Sierra Madre continental divide in the isthmian region. The three straight red lines represent different possible 23 kilometer long east-west transects that may be close to what Mormon had in mind when he described a Bountiful-Desolation line 1.5 days long.
        Proposed east-west lines in the Bountiful - Desolation border area
        The western end of the line bounded the west sea. And what would the unspecified eastern terminus of this line have been? In our area of interest it would have been the steep Sierra Madre mountains as this close-up clearly shows.
        23 kilometer long east-west lines running from the Sierra Madre
        to the Mar Muerto on the west coast
        • Alma 22:32 The greater land of Nephi + the greater land of Zarahemla, representing the entire land southward, was largely coastal territory, nearly surrounded by water.
        This map shows what Mormon may have been describing.
        Land southward nearly surrounded by water
        The red line perimeter around our proposed land southward consists of the Gulf of Mexico & Caribbean coastline at 2,383 kilometers, the Honduras & El Salvador border at 250 kilometers, the Pacific coastline at  980 kilometers, and the Isthmus of Tehuantepec border at 195 kilometers. That is a total length of 3,808 kilometers, of which 3,363 kilometers or 88.31% is water and 445 kilometers or 11.69% is land. "Nearly surrounded by water" is a reasonably accurate way to describe this landmass. Does this imply that the Yucatan Peninsula figures in The Book of Mormon narrative? Quite possibly. We have a great deal more textual exegesis remaining before we can locate Bountiful and the lands north of Bountiful with a high degree of confidence.

        • Alma 22:32 A small neck of land lay between the land northward and the land southward. 


          Book Notice - Exodus Lost by Stephen C. Compton

          $
          0
          0
          Stephen C. Compton's important new
          2011 book about Olmec origins
          Stephen C. Compton is unusual among contemporary scholars – a man at home in both the ancient Old World and the New. He spent a great deal of time as a young person with family members in Peru and Guatemala, which gives him an instinctual feel for things Olmec, Mayan, Teotihuacano and Aztec. He holds graduate degrees from the University of Chicago and Northwestern, which equip him to handle sources from ancient Egypt, the Levant and Mesopotamia with facility. After a 14 year research odyssey wandering around the Near East and Mesoamerica, he has published a well written, extensively documented, abundantly illustrated 344 page volume that changes the paradigm for Olmec origins. Looking at both cultures from a variety of sub-disciplines, Compton concludes that the enigmatic Olmec in ancient Mexico derive from the equally enigmatic Hyksos in ancient Egypt. Scholars will have difficulty faulting either his sources or his research methodology. Lay readers will enjoy his fast pace and provocative style. Serious students of The Book of Mormon will likely re-consider some previously held notions such as the date of the Flood (which impacts the date of the Tower of Babel), the broad equals sign we have tended to posit between the Jaredite and Olmec civilizations, and the origin of the Quetzalcoatl feathered serpent motif. Compton is at his best dealing with ancient languages, glyphic systems and alphabets, a topic that should interest many students of the Nephite text. 

          Highly recommended. Available in both paperback and Kindle editions.

          Great Cities

          $
          0
          0
          The Book of Mormon speaks of many different kinds and sizes of human settlements. See the blog article "Nephite Political Geography" for a concise list. The text mentions dozens of cities explicitly and alludes to many others Alma 50:15, Helaman 3:11. 8 cities merit the distinction of being called a "great city." Other great cities remain unnamed Helaman 7:22, 3 Nephi 8:14. The text makes a single reference to unnamed "large cities" Mosiah 27:6.

          Named or Attributed Great Cities
          • Jerusalem 1 Nephi 1:4 ca. 598 BC
          • Ammonihah Alma 16:9 ca. 81 BC There is irony in this localized usage Alma 9:4 based on civic boosterism. Neither Mormon as editor Alma 8:6 nor Alma2's special angel Alma 8:16 considered Ammonihah great.     
          • Jerusalem in the greater land of Nephi Alma 21:2 ca. 90 BC 
          • Zarahemla Helaman 1:18 ca. 51 BC Note that the city of Zarahemla is mentioned many times prior to 51 BC (e.g. Alma 2:26) but in those earlier years it is simply called a "city."
          • Moronihah 3 Nephi 8:25 ca. AD 34
          • Moroni 3 Nephi 9:4 ca. AD 34 Note that when it was founded ca. 72 BC, Moroni was not called a great city Alma 50:13. Nephite cities became great over time as one would expect with population growth. 
          • Jacobugath 3 Nephi 9:9 ca. AD 34
          • the unnamed city built by King Lib Ether 10:20
          The question naturally arises, "How much territory or population was required in Nephite times for a city to be considered a great city?" Credible data for Jerusalem in the Old World provide a benchmark. Margreet Steiner in her book Excavations in Jerusalem by K. M. Kenyon 1961 - 1967, Vol. III: The Settlement in the Bronze and Iron Ages (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2001) tells us that in 598 BC when the Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar invaded Jerusalem and set up Zedekiah as a puppet ruler the city walls were 5 - 7 meters wide and they enclosed about 50 hectares. The urban population was about 10,000. Jerusalem in that era was by far the largest city in the region. The second largest city, Ekron, was 20 hectares in size and most towns were only about 6 hectares. Ms. Steiner, one of the foremost archaeologists in the region, is one of the editors of the Handbook of the Archaeology of the Levant by Oxford University Press.

          The Book of Mormon refers to Old World Jerusalem as a great city four times 1 Nephi 1:4, 1 Nephi 2:13, 1 Nephi 10:3, 1 Nephi 11:3. So, in Nephite parlance, a city encompassing 50 hectares with 10,000 inhabitants qualified as a great city.

          The Electronic Atlas of  Ancient Maya Sites EAAMS classifies the 6,000+ archaeological sites in their database as Rank 1 - 5 sites. Rank 1 sites are very large, very important places such as Comalcalco, Palenque, Piedras Negras, Yaxchilan & Tikal. Rank 2 sites are large, important locations such as Chama, Itzan, El Ceibal, Lamanai & Kohunlich. Rank 3 sites are medium-sized. Rank 4 sites are small, and rank 5 sites are tiny - a house mound or a shell midden perhaps. As an example, El Hormiguero II, the site we correlate with Ammonihah (see the blog article "Ammonihah"), is a rank 3 in the EEAMS classification system.

          In order to compare and contrast archaeological sites empirically, we have begun an evolving blog post entitled "Site Sizes" that shows ancient cities ordered by the number of hectares they are known to have encompassed. Jerusalem ca. 598 BC at 50 hectares and 10,000 inhabitants helps benchmark that list.

          The case of Ammonihah in the list above should alert us to the fact that the term "great city" has other connotations (civic hubris) besides physical size.It is not a coincidence that all of the Nephite and Lamanite great cities (plus Old World Jerusalem 2 Nephi 1:4, Helaman 8:21) have a spectacular destruction documented in the text. The Lord, in His description of that destruction, did not consider the Lamanite Jerusalem great 3 Nephi 9:7 although Zarahemla 3 Nephi 9:3 and Moroni 3 Nephi 9:4 both merited that adjective.

          Captain Moroni in Space and Time

          $
          0
          0
          Captain Moroni stands like a colossus astride the Book of Alma war chapters. He is introduced to us in Alma 43:16 as the supreme commander of Nephite military forces, appointed at the young age of 25 Alma 43:17. We are not told precisely when he assumed command, but it must have been in the 17th or 18th year of the reign of the judges (ca 75 or 74 BC). His predecessor was Captain Zoram2  Alma 16:5. This is a brief chronology of Nephite military actions between ca. 81 BC when Zoram2 was chief captain and ca. 74 BC when Moroni was in command:
          • 81 BC Lamanites destroyed the city of Ammonihah Alma 16:2.
          • 81 BC Lamanites attacked the borders of the land of Noah, took Nephite captives Alma 16:3.
          • 81 BC  Zoram2 & sons, acting on prophetic intelligence, liberated the Nephite captives in the wilderness east of river Sidon and south of Manti Alma 16:8.
          • 81 BC the Lamanite invasion force fought many battles with  Zoram2's troops, with the Nephites ultimately prevailing Alma 25:3.
          • 78 BC the Lamanites invaded Nephite territory. No detail is given, but Mormon's cheery annual summary Alma 16:21 implies another Nephite victory.
          • 76 BC Lamanite armies followed the people of Ammon (Anti-Nephi-Lehies) from the greater land of Nephi through the narrow strip of wilderness into the eastern part of the greater land of Zarahemla near the land of Jershon. This precipitated the largest Nephite - Lamanite battle in over 500 years, resulting in tens of thousands of casualties Alma 28:2.
          In Alma 28:10 Mormon begins a recap of the violent first 15 years of the reign of the judges. He then indicates that the 16th & beginning of the 17th years passed in peace Alma 30:4-5. Korihor appeared on the scene and met his tragic end among the Zoramites in the land of Antionum that same year Alma 30:59. Ominously, the Zoramites on the eastern frontier of the greater land of Zarahemla had separated themselves from the Nephites Alma 30:59 which posed a strategic threat to the Nephite nation because just south of Antionum was east wilderness territory full of Lamanites Alma 31:3-4. In the 17th year of the reign of the judges, the Zoramites in Antionum officially joined forces with the Lamanites Alma 43:4 and began preparing for war Alma 35:11. The pacifist people of  Ammon (Anti-Nephi-Lehies) left Jershon for the safer confines of Melek after no more than 2 years residence in Jershon Alma 35:13 and the impoverished, outcast former Zoramites replaced them in Jershon Alma 35:14. This is the setting when Captain Moroni enters the narrative.

          Moroni was a technological innovator. In his campaign against Zarahemnah he equipped his troops with defensive armor Alma 43:19 which startled the enemy into flight. In his first campaign against the Lamanites under King Amalickiah he introduced defensive fortifications Alma 48:8. He was also an able recruiter who inspired confidence in the populace Alma 50:12. Mormon lionized Moroni Alma 48:17 and named his heir after the ancient war hero. Moroni's military strategies and tactics were nothing short of brilliant (See the blog article "Manti" that describes the campaign against Zerahemnah south of Manti in considerable detail.) Mormon considered Moroni's time the Nephite golden age Alma 50:23. The Nephite nation achieved its maximum territorial extent in the land southward under his military leadership.

          Moroni's first documented military action was his defense of the land of Jershon ca. 74 BC Alma 43:15. The Lamanites were joined with the Zoramites & Amlicites (See the blog article "Peripatetic Amlici" for reasons we support the critical text "Amlicites" rather than the 1981 LDS text "Amalekites") in the land of Antionum. In our proposed correlation, Jershon & Antionum are both in modern-day Belize separated by the large Belize River. As with all images on this blog, click to enlarge.
          Proposed location of the lands of Jershon & Antionum.
          Captain Moroni was in Jershon ca. 74 BC
          Their initial battle plan had been to attack Jershon from Antionum, but when the Lamanites under Zerahemnah saw the Nephite body armor, they panicked Alma 43:21 and retreated southward in a wide arc that passed near the head of the river Sidon upriver from the land of Manti. The Lamanites' plan B was to attack the land of Manti from the south, presuming it lightly defended. Acting on prophetic intelligence, Moroni left a small force behind to defend Jershon, gathered recruits en route, and arrived at the battle field south of Manti before Zerahemnah and the Lamanites. This map shows likely travel routes for Moroni in red and Zerahemnah in blue. Following the Polochic River, the Lamanites would have traveled approximately 330 kilometers while the Nephites, taking a more direct route, would have traveled approximately 283 kilometers.
          Likely routes of travel for Moroni (red) and Zerahemnah (blue)
          to the battlefield upriver from Manti ca. 74 BC
          For details of the battle south of Manti, see the blog article "Manti." Due largely to Moroni's skill as a battlefield tactician and inspirational motivator, the Nephites won a decisive victory over a much larger enemy force Alma 43:51.

          In the 19th year of the reign of the judges (ca. 73 BC) Amalickiah and some of the lower judges dissented Alma 46:4 and Moroni hoisted his famous title of liberty in response Alma 46:19. Amalickiah led a group of followers south, across the narrow strip of wilderness border, into wilderness territory in the northern part of the greater land of Nephi Alma 46:29. Moroni and his troops intercepted the Amalickiahites in the wilderness, administered an oath of allegiance to the cause of Nephite liberty, marched the oath-bound dissenters back north to the greater land of Zarahemla, and executed the recalcitrants Alma 46:32-35. Unfortunately for the Nephites, Amalickiah, a descendant of Zoram, escaped with a small entourage and went on to found a Lamanite dynasty with first himself Alma 47:35, then his brother, Ammoron Alma 52:3, and finally Ammoron's son, Tubaloth Helaman 1:16, as emperor. If Amalickiah followed the standard trail between Zarahemla and Nephi, the point where Moroni intercepted the Amalickiahites would have been somewhere in the modern Guatemalan Department of Baja Verapaz, likely between the Salama Valley on the north and the Motagua River on the south. This map shows our version of the standard Zarahemla to Nephi trail in purple, with the approximate location of the Moroni - Amalickiahites intercept point indicated.
          Likely area where Captain Moroni stopped most of the
          Amalickiahites in their flight to Nephi ca. 73 BC
          We like John L. Sorenson's suggestion that Oneidah (critical text orthography), the place of arms mentioned in Alma 47:5, was probably El Chayal just a few kilometers north east of present day Guatemala City.
          Likely location of Oneidah, the place of arms. El Chayal was
          one of the principal sources of obsidian in Mesoamerica 
          The purple line on the map below shows the probable route the servants of the slain Lamanite king took from the city of Nephi to the land of Melek where they joined the people of Ammon Alma 47:29. The thing they "came over" was the mountainous narrow strip of wilderness that separated the greater land of Nephi on the south from the greater land of Zarahemla on the north.
          Standard Nephi to Zarahemla route in purple, crossing over
          the mountainous narrow strip of wilderness in green
          In Amalickiah's first offensive against the Nephites, ca. 72 BC, he sent his forces right up the center of the greater land of Zarahemla targeting the partially rebuilt Ammonihah in a repeat of the successful 81 BC raid described in Alma 16:2-3. The surprised Lamanite armies faced Moroni's earthen fortifications for the first time. Moroni had excellent military intelligence because even though he had not yet fortified every city throughout the Nephite republic Alma 50:1, he correctly anticipated a thwarted attack on Ammonihah followed by a revenge attack on Noah Alma 49:15.
          Proposed locations of Ammonihah and Noah in context with
          other places associated with Moroni prior to ca. 72 BC
          Soundly defeated at Noah by the brilliance of Moroni's military engineering, the humiliated Lamanites retreated back to the land of Nephi Alma 49:25. The casualty count at Noah was an astonishing 1,000+ Lamanites dead and about 50 Nephites wounded Alma 49:23-24. Captain Moroni's innovative defensive strategy was clearly a decisive military advantage for his beloved homeland and the Nephites wasted no time implementing it throughout their territory Alma 50:6.

          The 20th year of the reign of the judges (ca. 72 BC) began an axial period in Nephite history. Large defensive public works construction projects were underway throughout the republic Alma 50:1. In a Nephite version of manifest destiny, Moroni cleared the east and west wilderness areas of Lamanites Alma 50:11 and caused Nephite colonists to settle newly-opened areas Alma 50:9. He fortified the southern border of the greater land of Zarahemla Alma 50:10 along the narrow strip of wilderness that separated the Nephites on the north from the Lamanites on the south. Moroni founded his namesake city and land Alma 8:7 on the east sea in the extreme south eastern corner of Nephite territory Alma 50:13, Alma 51:22. The Nephites were celebrating a string of military victories dating back 10 years. The destruction of Ammonihah in 81 BC had been their last major defeat. Voluntary recruits were flocking to Moroni's armies Alma 50:12 and new cities were springing up Alma 50:15. The Nephite economy was booming Alma 50:18. Mormon identifies the 21st year of the reign of the judges (ca. 71 BC) as a high water mark in the history of the Nephite nation Alma 50:23, the halcyon years Alma 50:24.

          Some proposed geographic referents from the Nephite apogee ca. 72 BC.

          Alma 50:7 the east wilderness; the Lamanites' own lands, the greater land of Nephi; the greater land of Zarahemla.
          East wilderness, greater land of Zarahemla, greater land of Nephi
          at Nephite territorial maximum ca. 72 BC
          Alma 50:8 the greater land of Nephi ran in a straight course (in our correlation, generally following the Motagua River) from the east sea to the west. The greater land of Nephi extended from the east sea to the west sea Alma 22:27.
          Greater land of Nephi ca. 72 BC. Notice the straight black line
          running along the Motagua River for 184 kilometers
          Alma 50:11 describes Captain Moroni clearing the Lamanites out of the wildernesses on both the east and the west of the greater land of Zarahemla. These are the same wilderness areas Mormon described in Alma 22:28-29 (ca. 90 BC) as being so full of Lamanites that the Nephites were nearly surrounded. Now, 18 years later, confident in his military technology and strategy, Captain Moroni asserted Nephite territorial claims, expelled foreigners, and fortified the border. This is our view of the east and west wilderness areas (pale green) and the defensive line (red) between the Nephites on the north and the Lamanites on the south. This line ran by the head of Sidon which we correlate with the confluence of the Chixoy/Negro and the Salama that forms the Chixoy (credit V. Garth Norman). The line forms the northern boundary of the area we have identified as the narrow strip of wilderness. It is a line of steep cliffs that run almost from the Caribbean to the Pacific, formed by the boundary of the North American and Caribbean tectonic plates.
          Proposed east wilderness, west wilderness, and line (in red) 
          between the Nephites and Lamanites ca. 72 BC
          Alma 50:11 The Nephites claimed all the territory north of the defensive line shown in red above, although they never really controlled such vast holdings as we explain in the blog article "Bountiful - Context." Nominal Nephite hegemony extended to the land Bountiful north of the greater land of Zarahemla, and the land Desolation even northward from Bountiful.
          Land Bountiful north of greater land of Zarahemla and
          land Desolation northward of Bountiful ca. 72 BC
          Alma 50:12 the "lands of their possessions," mentioned twice in this verse, refers to the territory north of the line between the Nephites and the Lamanites. Our proposal for this line is shown in red on the map above. North of this line lay the greater land of Zarahemla. North of the greater land of Zarahemla lay the land Bountiful, and northward of Bountiful lay the land Desolation in the land northward. The boundary between Desolation and Bountiful was the boundary between the land northward and the land southward.

          Alma 50:13 In ca. 72 BC, as part of the eastward expansion of the Nephite nation, Captain Moroni founded an eponymous city and land in the extreme southwest corner of the greater land of  Zarahemla to defend against Lamanite incursions. Originally by the east sea, the city of Moroni slid into the ocean at the time of Christ's crucifixion 3 Nephi 9:4. In 72 BC, the city and land of Nephihah were founded bordering the land of Moroni and the city (no land  is ever mentioned) of Aaron. Also in 72 BC, the coastal city and land of Lehi were established north of Moroni, presumably named after one of Moroni's trusted chief captains Alma 53:2. This map shows our proposed correlations for the cities of Moroni (Tiger Mound, now submerged under the waters of Amatique Bay off Toledo District, Belize), Nephihah (El Prado, Peten, Guatemala), Aaron (El Ceibal, Peten, Guatemala) and Lehi (False Cay, Stann Creek, Belize).
          Proposed locations for the cities & lands of Moroni, Nephihah and
          Lehi, as well as the city of Aaron ca. 72 B.C.
          Alma 50:17-24 describes the Nephite golden age, a time of peace and prosperity from ca. 71 BC to ca. 69 BC when Captain Moroni was directing the fortification of many Nephite cities from his headquarters in the land of Moroni.

          During the Nephite golden age, two major problems lurked beneath the surface of their otherwise prosperous circumstances. 1) The Nephite system of government depended on widespread public morality Mosiah 29:26-27 and  granted considerable local autonomy Mosiah 29:29. This decentralization made it relatively easy for fractious dissenters to break away and form seditious rebellions. 2) The Nephites simply lacked the manpower to adequately defend their huge, newly-expanded territory Alma 51:23, Alma 58:23. Reduced through internal dissension and external invasion, the Nephite polity extending from the east sea to the west sea only lasted a few years. Captain Moroni made a serious strategic miscalculation that ended up costing the Nephite nation dearly. Based on their remarkable, unprecedented victory at Noah Alma 49:23-24 ca. 72 BC, Moroni underestimated the number of fighting men that would be required to hold one of the Nephites' newly-fortified cities against a vastly superior enemy force. As it turned out, a fortified Nephite city in Lamanite hands was a military liability rather than an asset.

          Up the east seacoast from the land of Lehi, the charismatic Morianton had founded an eponymous city and land and in ca. 68 BC, a border war broke out between the people of Morianton and their neighbors to the south, the people living in the land of Lehi. Alma 50:25-26. This tells us that the border between these two coastal lands was a political boundary subject to interpretation rather than a natural feature like a river. This map shows our proposed city of Morianton (the site of Oshon, Belize District, Belize) north of Lehi and Moroni. The boundary between the lands of Morianton and Lehi we take as the current political boundary between the Belizean districts of Stann Creek on the south and Belize on the north.
          Map showing the proposed locations of the lands of Moroni,
          Lehi and Morianton along the Belizean coast ca. 68 BC
          The people living in the land of Lehi, rather than fight their northern neighbors, abandoned their homesteads and fled southward to the camp of Moroni in the land of Moroni Alma 50:27. Fearing an attack from Moroni's powerful force, Morianton convinced his followers to pull up stakes and move en masse into the well-watered land northward Alma 50:29. Moroni dispatched Teancum and his elite troops. After chasing the Moriantonites for some time, Teancum's army intercepted the dissidents near the borders of the land Desolation by the narrow pass that led by the sea into the land northward. This narrow pass was by a sea on the west and a sea on the east Alma 50:33-34. There is a topography, first described by Ric Hauck and Joe V. Andersen, that precisely fits the textual description of the area around the narrow pass. This map shows the Moriantonites likely flight path in black and Teancum's likely interdiction route in white.
          Proposed route of Morianton (black) and Teancum (white)
          to their battle site near the narrow pass that led by the sea
          into the land northward. Military action ca. 68 BC.
          And this closeup of the narrow pass area shows a cluster of important geographic referents near the Bountiful - Desolation border.
          Candidate narrow neck, narrow pass & narrow passage
          all near the east - west Bountiful - Desolation border
          In the 25th year of the reign of the judges (ca. 67 BC) Captain Moroni took his army, left the land of Moroni, and marched against the rebellious kingmen, killing 4,000 of them throughout the greater land of Zarahemla Alma 51:17-19. Moroni obviously believed that his recent military innovation (fortified cities) would allow the Nephite commanders who remained along the east coast to stand their ground against Amalickiah's huge army. That proved not to be the case. Soon after Captain Moroni's departure, the city of Moroni fell Alma 51:23 and Amalickiah marched right up the east coast in a blitzkrieg, capturing the Nephite cities of Lehi, Morianton, Omner, Gid and Mulek in quick succession Alma 51:26. (Note that "Nephihah" in Alma 51:26 in the 1981 LDS edition of the Book of Mormon is a blatant error also extant in the original manuscript. Royal Skousen's critical text correctly replaces "Nephihah" with "Moroni" in this verse. Nephite refugees from the southern lands and cities along the east coast (Moroni, Lehi, Morianton) fled to inland Nephihah Alma 59:5. Nephite refugees from the northern cities along the east coast (Omner, Gid, Mulek) presumably fled to the land Bountiful defended by Teancum and his very able warriors Alma 51:31. Many Nephite prisoners were incarcerated in the city of Gid Alma 55:7. Here is a map of our proposed correlation of the Nephite east coast. Omner we correlate with the site of Altun Ha in Belize District, Belize. For Gid, we propose the site of Yakalche in Corozal, Belize. Mulek we correlate with the site of Cerros in the New River delta, Corozal, Belize. The city Bountiful we correlate with the site of Bugambilas across the Hondo River from Belize in the modern Mexican state of Quintana Roo. Bugambilas is located about 7 kilometers north of the Mexico - Belize border in the Orthon P. Blanco Municipality north west of Chetumal.
          Proposed lands & cities along the Nephite east coast ca. 67 BC
          The Lamanites' dream and the Nephites' nightmare was for the Nephites to be surrounded by the Lamanites Alma 22:34Alma 52:9 with no avenue of escape in time of crisis. The land Bountiful was the  Nephites' last resort. It was the northernmost Nephite land in the land southward, and the gateway to the land northward. This map shows Amalickiah's audacious objective: to invade the land Bountiful north of the city of Mulek and then use it as a staging ground to launch a strike into the land northward Alma 51:30, Alma 52:2 that would encircle the Nephites.
          Visualization of  Amalickiah's military objective, ca. 67 BC 
          Fortunately for the Nephites, Teancum stopped Amalickiah's advance before the Lamanites could invade the land Bountiful. Teancum killed Amalickiah in a daring night operation Alma 51:34 and the dispirited Lamanite force hunkered down in the fortified city of Mulek Alma 52:2. At the end of the 25th year of the reign of the judges (ca. 67 BC), Moroni was putting down the kingmen insurgency throughout those parts of the greater land of Zarahemla that still remained in Nephite hands. Teancum was entrenched with his army protecting the city of Bountiful in the extreme north east corner of Nephite lands. The Lamanites were firmly in control of the east coast from Moroni on the south to Mulek on the north. Nephite refugees from Moroni, Lehi and Morianton were temporarily re-located in Nephihah. This map shows the situation as Alma chapter 51 ends.
          Relative locations of Captain Moroni, Teancum and the Lamanite invasion
          along the east coast ca. 67 BC. Lamanite controlled territory in white.
          In the 26th year of the reign of the judges, ca. 66 BC, Ammoron succeeded his slain brother as Lamanite emperor, returned from the battlefield to the greater land of  Nephi, raised a sizable new army, and opened a second front in the war by invading the Nephite west coast Alma 52:12. Captain Moroni took his army and marched to the south west quarter of the land to oppose Ammoron Alma 52:11. Moroni also ordered Teancum to fortify the land Bountiful and to secure the narrow pass that led into the land northward Alma 52:9. Teancum knew the narrow pass area well. He had defeated Morianton at that very spot two years earlier. This map shows the relative locations of  Teancum's main forces on the east coast, Teancum's expeditionary forces on the west coast, Captain Moroni's army, and King Ammoron's Lamanite armies on both coasts.
          Proposed locations of Lamanite forces under Ammoron on both coasts, Teancum's
          Bountiful defense forces on both coasts, and Captain Moroni ca. 66 BC
          Some of Captain Moroni's strategic thinking is now clear. As he had in previous conflicts, Moroni positioned himself and his army at the leading edge of the most active front. Teancum, with some of the Nephites' best troops Alma 51:31, commanded the armies of last resort defending the all-important land Bountiful on both coasts. If Bountiful ever fell, the Nephites would be surrounded with nowhere to flee.

          In the 27th year of the reign of the judges, ca. 65 BC, Captain Moroni, having positioned armies to defend the south and west borders of the greater land of Zarahemla, had began a long march to join Teancum in the north east quarter of the land - in the city Bountiful Alma 52:17. Moroni almost certainly went through the Nephite heartland recruiting more fighting men and strengthening the government against the restive seditious elements that had escaped his purges two years earlier, because his march to the northern east coast took the entire year Alma 52:18. This map shows Moroni's likely circuitous route in purple from the Judea - Antiparah area in the extreme south west of Nephite territory to the city Bountiful in the north east corner.
          Proposed route of Captain Moroni's march in purple through
          the greater land of Zarahemla ca. 65 BC
          If this was indeed Captain Moroni's route of travel, he went 1,385 kilometers which according to our benchmark (See the blog article "Land Southward Travel Times") would have taken him about 3 months travel time. It is important now to clarify the chronology as Helaman and his 2,000 stripling warriors become part of the narrative. In the 26th year of the reign of the judges, ca. 66 BC, these are some of the major events that occurred: 
          • As the year began, the entire east coast from Moroni on the south to Mulek on the north was under Lamanite control, Amalickiah had just tried unsuccessfully to invade the land Bountiful north of Mulek, and Teancum had just killed Amalickiah with a javelin thrust through his heart Alma 52:1.
          • Ammoron was crowned Lamanite king, replacing his dead brother Alma 52:3.
          • Ammoron traveled from the battle zone (probably the city of Mulek) back to the local land of Nephi to consult with the Lamanite queen Alma 52:12. He raised a large army and led an invasion force up the Nephite west coast. The Nephites were now fighting on an eastern and a western front. 
          • Captain Moroni, not quite finished with his anti insurrection campaign against the kingmen throughout the greater land of Zarahemla, had intended to return to the eastern theater and join forces with Teancum in the city Bountiful. Ammoron's west coast invasion changed everything. Moroni hurried to the south west quarter of the greater land of Zarahemla and established a defensive perimeter at key points along the border Alma 52:11, Alma 52:15.
          • As a fail safe in case the Lamanites breached the Nephite defenses along the west coast, Captain Moroni ordered Teancum to divide his forces and secure the narrow pass leading into the land northward at the same time he (Teancum) was defending the city Bountiful on the east coast Alma 52:9.
          • Moroni did not stay long in the south west. At the end of the 26th year, he was already on his year-long march to join Teancum in the city Bountiful Alma 52:15.
          • Meanwhile, as soon as Moroni left the area, a Nephite dissension arose in the south west quarter of the greater land of Zarhaemla Alma 53:8. This provided an opening for the Lamanite forces under Ammoron, and they quickly captured the cities of Manti, Zeezrom, Cumeni and Antiparah Alma 56:13-15.
          • Seeing the Lamanites approach their homeland in Melek, the people of Ammon (Anti-Nephi-Lehies) were about to break their pacifist oath and join the Nephite army Alma 56:7.
          • Remaining faithful, the people of Ammon mustered an army of 2,000 young men whom Helaman led from the land of Melek to the city of Judea where they greatly strengthened Antipus and his decimated, dispirited troops Alma 56:9-10, Alma 56:15-17.
          This map shows our proposal for the Nephite situation at the end of the 26th year of the judges with Helaman recently arrived in Judea and Captain Moroni en route to the city of Bountiful.
          Proposed situation at the end of the 26th year of the judges ca. 66 BC.
          Lamanite-held territories in white.
             
          During the 27th year of the judges, ca. 65 BC, Teancum's Bountiful defense forces in the west saw no enemy action and in the east they were not engaged in any direct military activity as they waited for the arrival of Captain Moroni's army to bolster their troop strength Alma 52:17. Captain Moroni's precise activities during the year are not recorded, but he finally joined Teancum in the city Bountiful at year's end Alma 52:18. Helaman and the army of Antipus, on the other hand, were heavily engaged with the enemy in the south west quarter of the greater land of Zarahemla. Helaman and his 2,000 Ammonites marched from Judea to a point near Antiparah, then toward the city beyond on the borders by the seashore Alma 56:30-33. Decoying the Lamanites out of Antiparah, Helaman then marched in a northward direction for part of one day, all of the next day, and part of a third  day with the Lamanites in hot pursuit and the army of Antipus behind the Lamanites. Helaman then doubled back to engage the Lamanites in a fierce battle where the 2,000 heroic young Ammonites saved the day Alma 56:54. This map shows our proposed location for this military engagement along the west coast of the greater land of Zarahemla. In our correlation, the city of Judea is the site of Pijijiapan, Antiparah is La Permuta and the city beyond is Pajon, all in the Pacific coastal plain of the modern Mexican state of Chiapas.
          Proposed locations of Judea, Antiparah and the city beyond ca. 65 BC
          The 27th year of the judges ended with Helaman and his 2,000 warriors in Judea and a much reduced Lamanite force still occupying Antiparah.

          During the 28th year of the judges, ca. 64 BC, the weakened Lamanites on the western front voluntarily vacated the city of Antiparah which returned to Nephite hands without bloodshed Alma 57:4. On the eastern front, Captains Moroni, Teancum and Lehi executed a brilliant feint that lured the Lamanites out of the heavily fortified city of Mulek. In our correlation, the city of Mulek is the site of Cerros on Chetumal Bay in Corozal District, Belize. Teancum marched along the seashore with the Lamanites under Jacob in hot pursuit Alma 52:23-24. When they neared the land Bountiful, the Lamanites did an about face and began to return to Mulek with Lehi and his army bearing down on them Alma 52:28. They were met by Captain Moroni who had positioned his army in the Lamanites' return path Alma 52:34. This  map shows our proposal for the location of this decisive Nephite victory in which Captain Moroni was wounded. The green shading represents our proposed land of Bountiful north of the Hondo River in Quintana Roo, Mexico. The purple line represents Teancum's march and the blue line Jacob's pursuit. Lehi coming down from the land of Bountiful is shown in red, with Moroni in white coming up from his wilderness camp west of Mulek. 
          Likely location of the battle of Mulek, ca. 64 BC in what is today
          the Corozal District of Belize
          One is frequently in awe of Captain Moroni's skill as a battlefield tactician. If this really is the area where the Battle of Mulek took place, Jacob and his Lamanite troops had just marched 32 kilometers when they were  surrounded by two armies who had only traveled 1/4 that distance to the point of engagement. It would not be hard to redraw the map above to make the relative distances even more exaggerated.

          After their great triumph, Captain Moroni installed Lehi as the Nephite commander in the recaptured city of Mulek Alma 53:2 while Teancum returned to his familiar city of Bountiful Alma 53:3 where Captain Moroni was also headquartered. As the 28th year of the judges came to a close, the Nephites had retaken one city in the west (Antiparah) and one city in the east (Mulek).

          During the 29th year of the judges, ca. 63 BC, Moroni and Ammoron exchanged vitriolic epistles where for the first time, an enraged Nephite commander threatened to go on the offensive and exterminate the Lamanites in their traditional homelands Alma 54:12.

          Gid, the next major city south of Mulek along the east coast, was a prisoner of war camp with Nephite men, women and children inside the defensive embankment, Lamanite guards at the entrance, and a Lamanite army encamped outside the city proper. Captain Moroni recruited a small group of ethnic Lamanites who delivered strong wine to the guards standing watch at the city gate. Predictably, the guards drank themselves into a stupor Alma 55:14. This allowed Moroni to arm the prisoners Alma 55:16 and surround the Lamanite army Alma 55:21. At daybreak, the surprised Lamanite forces surrendered without a fight and  were eventually marched to the Nephite prisoner of war internment facility at the city Bountiful Alma 55:26.

          The city of Omner is conspicuously absent in Mormon's narrative of Captain Moroni's liberation campaign down the east coast. We assume Omner returned to Nephite control because at the end of the 29th year of the judges, Moroni was devising a battle plan to retake the heavily fortified city of Morianton south of Omner Alma 55:33. When you consider the disastrous year the Lamanites had on the southwestern front in the 29th year of the judges (after losing Cumeni, Zeezrom and Manti to Helaman's forces, the Lamanites abandoned their war effort in that part of the greater land of Zarahemla Alma 58:38 and went home) it seems likely that the Lamanites may have simply walked away from Omner as they had the year before from Antiparah to focus their resources on the area from Morianton on the north to Moroni and Nephiah on the south. Omner may have been the source of some of the new Lamanite forces mentioned in Alma 55:34.
          This map shows our interpretation of the situation on the eastern front at the end of the 29th year of the judges. Lamanite held territory is shown in white.
          Lamanite held territory along the east coast ca. 63 BC. By this time
          Mulek, Gid and presumably Omner were back in Nephite hands.
          The 29th year of the judges was pivotal for Helaman's armies in the south western quarter of the greater land of Zarahemla. With Antiparah under Nephite control, Helaman devised a battle plan to retake Cumeni, the next city to the east along the Nephite southern periphery Alma 57:7. The Nephites besieged Cumeni, intercepted delivery of Lamanite food supplies Alma 57:10, and took the Lamanite porters captive. With their supply lines disrupted, the Lamanite army occupying Cumeni soon grew hungry, then despondent and finally they surrendered Alma 57:12. Helaman and company then had a massive prisoner of war population on their hands so they sent part of their force to march the restive Lamanite prisoners down to the land of Zarahemla Alma 57:16. This map shows a likely route (in purple) from our proposed city of Cumeni (La Libertad, Huehuetenango, Guatemala) to the local land of Zarahemla (in the general vicinity of Palenque, Chiapas, Mexico). Lamanite held territory is shown in white.
          Plausible route from Cumeni to local land of Zarahemla ca. 63 BC
          The text says one went down Alma 57:16 from Cumeni (elevation 720 meters) to the local land of Zarahemla (average elevation 53 meters). Note that the likely route of travel followed the Mezcalapa-Grijalva River downstream, skirted around the formidable Sumidero Canyon north of modern Tuxtla Gutierrez, then headed east along the piedmont on the northern edge of the Chiapas Mountains.

          The Nephite force guarding prisoners down to the land of Zarahemla traveled for less than 1 day before Nephite spies informed them that a Lamanite army from Manti was approaching Cumeni and an attack was imminent Alma 57:30-31. In our correlation, the city of Manti is the site of Chama in Alta Verapaz, Guatemala. The typical travel route in antiquity from Chama to La Libertad is shown in aqua on the map below. It was about an 11 day trip one-way.
          Likely travel route from Manti to Cumeni ca. 63 BC
          With help from all 3 Nephite elements (the Cumeni defense force, Helaman's 2,060 Ammonites, and the prisoner of war detail that had been guarding Lamanite captives down to the local land of Zarahemla) the Nephites prevailed in the battle of Cumeni at the cost of 1,000 soldiers killed in action Alma 57:26.

          Like Omner on the east coast, we are not told how the city of Zeezrom returned to Nephite hands. We do know that several months Alma 58:7 elapsed between the liberations of Cumeni and Manti. The Nephites were stretched very thin Alma 58:3, Alma 58:32 defending their far-flung territory including the newly-retaken cities of Antiparah and Cumeni. Helaman considered 2,000 reinforcement troops from the Nephite heartland trivial Alma 58:9 relative to the daunting task he faced of defeating a vastly superior Alma 58:8 Lamanite army protected by heavy fortifications around the city of Manti Alma 58:23. Helaman knew that 2,000 fresh fighting men were far below the demographic capacity of the Nephite nation at the time Alma 58:36. Nephite supply lines, so robust just two years earlier along the west coast Alma 56:27-29 were now very tenuous Alma 58:7 as Helaman's army approached Manti. Helaman had limited contact with his government Alma 58:34 and practically no communication with his commanding officer Alma 58:35. The Lamanites in Manti, on the other hand, were well supplied with both men and materiel Alma 58:5.         

          The ingenious strategy Helaman employed to retake the city of Manti with very little bloodshed is shown in considerable detail in the blog article entitled "Manti." One is frankly awed by the brilliant way Helaman and Moroni took advantage of local terrain to triumph over much larger Lamanite armies. This map shows Lamanite controlled areas in white at the end of the 29th year of the judges, ca. 63 BC, when all the cities in the south west quarter of the greater land of Zarahemla were back in Nephite hands.
          Proposed situation at the end of the 29th year of the judges,
          ca. 63 BC. Lamanite held territory in white.
          Helaman and his Ammonite "sons" were in Manti Alma 58:39 when the prophet/general wrote his epistle to Captain Moroni. The large Lamanite army that had occupied Manti for three years fled into the wilderness Alma 58:29 after the Nephites recaptured the city. Some of the Lamanite troops returned southward to their homeland, the greater land of Nephi Alma 58:38. Others went eastward where they soon mounted an attack on Nephihah Alma 59:6. A subtle shift has occurred in the map above. The narrow strip of wilderness is no longer visible. The white polygon representing Lamanite held territory now extends to the northern edge of the narrow strip of wilderness. By 63 BC the Lamanites had begun permanently occupying  the buffer zone that used to separate Nephite lands on the north from Lamanites lands on the south. An inexorable Lamanite movement northward was well underway. The following geographic referents do not appear in the text after the book of Alma:
          • city or land of Manti
          • head of river Sidon
          • land of Melek
          • city of Zeezrom
          • city of Cumeni
          • city of Antiparah
          • city of Judea
          and there are many others we could add to this list. The point is that by 63 BC the Nephites had already passed their territorial maximum in the land southward and would soon begin large scale migrations into the land northward in the face of relentless Lamanite military and demographic pressure.

          In the 30th year of the judges, ca. 62 BC, the Lamanites invaded Nephihah. Those Nephites able to flee the slaughter in Nephihah came over and joined the army of Captain Moroni Alma 59:8. In our correlation, the city of Nephihah is the site of El Prado near the confluence of the Machaquila with the Pasion in Peten, Guatemala. Captain Moroni at this time was defending the north east quarter of the greater land of Zarahemla and the eastern part of the land Bountiful - the area between the city Bountiful on the north and the city of Omner on the south. The terrain feature the refugees from Nephihah had to cross over to join Moroni's army was the Maya Mountains where some peaks rise above 1,000 meters elevation. The map below shows the Maya Mountains in brown and our proposal for Nephihah, the general location of Captain Moroni's army, and the extent of Lamanite controlled territory (in white) after the invasion of Nephihah.
          Maya Mountains separating proposed Nephihah
          from Captain Moroni's army ca. 62 BC
          When Captain Moroni received Helaman's epistle summarizing 4 years of warfare in the south western quarter of Nephite lands, the supreme commander of Nephite forces was surprisingly ignorant about key developments on the second front in his war Alma 59:1-2. He was equally uninformed about important aspects of defense coordination with his own government Alma 59:9. Moroni sent an epistle to Governor Parhoron (critical text orthography) requesting reinforcement troops for Helaman. Parhoron did not reply because he and the other freemen had been driven out of the city and local land of Zarahemla by rebellious kingmen under newly-crowned king Pachus Alma 62:6. Parhoron was busy setting up a government in exile across the Sidon in the neighboring land of Gideon Alma 61:5. Moroni's scathing second epistle takes up the whole of Alma chapter 60. Governor Parhoron responded to the second epistle, inviting Captain Moroni to bring fighting men and join him in Gideon Alma 61:15 to jointly launch a counter-offensive against the kingmen controlling the local land of Zarahemla. Moroni did travel to Gideon with a few men and recruited many others into his army en route Alma 62:4. Moroni and Parhoron combined forces and routed the kingmen occupying the local land of Zarahemla Alma 62:7-8. This map shows Moroni's likely route of travel from the north eastern war front to the land of Gideon and then on to the battle with Pachus in the city of Zarahemla. See the blog article entitled "Gideon" for more details on the Gideon - Zarahemla relationship including the topography of going "down" from Gideon to Zarahemla as per Alma 62:7.
          Captain Moroni's likely route of travel in purple from the
          north east front to Zarahemla via Gideon ca. 62 BC
          As the 30th year of the judges ended, Helaman was still in the city of Manti, Parhoron had been restored to his judgment seat in the city of Zarahemla, Captain Moroni was in the city of Zarahemla after having executed all the kingmen, and the Lamanites under Ammoron still occupied Nephihah, Morianton, Lehi and Moroni.

          In the 31st year of the judges, ca. 61 BC, Moroni sent 6,000 men plus provisions Alma 62:12 to reinforce Helaman's army defending Manti and the south western front. He also sent a similar contingent of men and supplies to reinforce the armies of Lehi and Teancum on the north eastern front. Leaving a defense force behind in the local land of Zarahemla, Moroni and Parhoron together led a major strike force against Lamanite-held Nephihah Alma 62:14. Before they reached Nephihah, Moroni and Parhoron engaged and disarmed a large army of Lamanites. The 4,000 Lamanites who were not killed in the action were put under oath and sent to live with the Ammonites (Anti-Nephi-Lehies) in the land of Melek Alma 62:17. This map shows the likely route Moroni and Parhoron took from Zarahemla to Nephihah, with a proposed location for their battle with the Lamanite expeditionary force just south of our city of Aaron, correlated with the site of El Ceibal in Peten, Guatemala.
          Proposed route of Moroni & Parhoron in purple from Zarahemla to Nephihah.
          Likely route of 4,000 Lamanites in aqua from battle site to Melek.
          Both ca. 61 BC. 
          Some items of interest in this part of Alma 62:
          • The Lamanites were obviously attempting to expand their area of influence north of Nephihah which they already held. The text says Moroni & company engaged the large Lamanite expeditionary force as they (the Nephites) were marching towards the land of Nephihah Alma 62:15. The Lamanites' most likely target was the city of Aaron which lay between Nephihah and Ammonihah Alma 8:13, Alma 50:14.
          • Additional Lamanites joined with the people of Ammon in Alma 47:29, Alma 62:17, and Alma 62:29. Helaman's 2,060 stripling warriors were not the only Ammonites in the Nephite army. Alma 55:5 tells us one of the servants of the king slain by Amalickiah fought with Captain Moroni.
          • The phrase "took their march" Alma 62:14, the military version of "took their journey" Mosiah 28:9 connotes a long trip.
          • Mormon's verbiage "they took a large body of men" Alma 62:15 implies a surprise capture rather than a traditional battle.
          Gideon was east of Zarahemla Alma 6:7. Ammonihah was east of Gideon (see the blog articles "Ammonihah" and "The Usumacinta/Sidon Correlation"). Aaron was a considerable distance beyond Ammonihah Alma 8:13. Nephihah was between Aaron and Moroni Alma 50:14. Moroni was in the extreme south eastern corner of Nephite lands, on the east seacoast Alma 50:13. Notice how logically this string of Nephite polities lays out on our map. Keep in mind that Moroni is underwater on the modern map 3 Nephi 8:9.
          Proposed relationship between Zarahemla, Gideon,
          Ammonihah, Aaron,Nephihah and Moroni
          After their capture of the Lamanite expeditionary force, Captain Moroni and Parhoron did not "take their march" again to Nephihah. They merely "pursued" or continued the march they had previously taken Alma 62:18. This wording is compatible with a relatively short travel distance from the battle site to the land of Nephihah. Nephihah was one of only two places in Nephite lands with plains mentioned Alma 62:19. The other plains were between the cities of Bountiful and Mulek Alma 52:20. Notice on this map the rough, broken country north, south, east and west of our proposed Nephihah, and the level ground immediately around the site.
          Proposed Nephihah (El Prado) with plains immediately adjacent
          Among the Lamanites, Moroni and his army had a reputation for bravery Alma 62:19. The liberation of Nephihah was one of the few times Nephite forces outnumbered their enemy in a military encounter. Moroni may have been able to take Nephihah by brute force, but true to his nature, he devised an ingenious battle plan. He had his army climb the embankment and palisade surrounding the city under cover of darkness and rappel down the inner slope Alma 62:22. At daybreak, the frightened Lamanites fled in confusion out of the gate which was on the eastern edge of the city of Nephihah Alma 62:21. The Nephites killed many Lamanite soldiers and took many prisoners. The Lamanites who escaped went eastward into the land of Moroni Alma 62:25. The prisoners all opted to join the people of Ammon in the land of Melek where they became industrious farmers and herdsmen Alma 62:29. Captain Moroni's brilliant battle plan liberated the city of Nephihah without the loss of a single Nephite life Alma 62:26. This map shows the situation immediately after Nephihah returned to Nephite control. Lamanite occupied areas are shown in white.
          Likely movement of Lamanites to Moroni & Melek (aqua arrows)
          after Captain Moroni's iberation of Nephihah ca. 61 BC
          After recapturing the city of Nephihah, Captain Moroni marched to the land of Lehi along the east coast Alma 62:30 where the mere presence of the famed Nephite general caused the Lamanite forces to flee in fear Alma 62:31.

          Some observations from this part of Alma 62:
          • the last time Captain Moroni was on the east coast, a year and a half earlier, he was preparing a battle plan to liberate heavily fortified Morianton north of Lehi Alma 55:33 when he was drawn away to put down the rebellion of Pachus and the kingmen in the local land of Zarahemla. What happened at Morianton? The text is silent. Obviously, by the time Captain Moroni went into the land of Lehi, Morianton was back in Nephite hands because Lehi and Teancum had come down the east coast to the land of Lehi Alma 62:32 from their previous positions north of Morianton.
          • there were three different Nephite cities where the text mentions the Lamanite invasion and capture, but not the liberation: Omner, Zeezrom and now Morianton.
          • the land of Lehi contained multiple cities Alma 62:32 consistent with Alma 50:15. This was true of Nephite lands in general, although the text only mentions one city by name in any given land - the eponymous city (e.g. Gideon, Lehi, Moroni, Zarahemla, etc.). Some lands had a city that is never named (e.g. Jershon Alma 43:25) and some lands had no cities at all ever mentioned (e.g. Melek, Sidom).
          • Moroni entered the land of Lehi from the west and forced the Lamanites eastward. Lehi and Teancum entered the land of Lehi from the north and forced the Lamanites southward. The Lamanites in the land of Lehi fled southward along the east coast and joined the main Lamanite army under Ammoron in the land of Moroni Alma 62:32-33.
          This map shows our interpretation of the situation along the east coast in the latter part of the 31st year of the judges while the Lamanites were still occupying the land of Moroni. Lamanite controlled areas are shown in white.
          Lamanite held areas in white after the liberation
          of the land of Lehi ca. 61 BC
          Alma 62:34 begins the account of Captain Moroni's final battle - the liberation of his namesake land of Moroni in the 31st year of the reign of the judges ca. 61 BC. Captains Moroni, Lehi and Teancum all chased  Lamanites who fled from the land of Lehi southward along the seacoast Alma 62:32 to the land of Moroni. All the Lamanites were gathered together in one place Alma 62:33, a walled city Alma 62:36 which must have been the heavily fortified city of Moroni Alma 51:23. Both the Nephites and the Lamanites were exhausted after their long march from Lehi to Moroni Alma 62:35. The Nephites were camped around the city of Moroni by wilderness on the south and wilderness on the east Alma 62:34. We know that the city of Moroni was on the east sea coast and that is was near the line that separated Nephite lands on the north from Lamanite lands on the south Alma 50:13. This map shows our proposed correlation for the city of Moroni, greatly complicated by the fact that it has been underwater since the destruction at the time of the Savior's crucifixion 3 Nephi 8:9.
          Proposed locations of the cities of Lehi and Moroni
          along the southern east coast ca. 61 BC
          Some things to look for on the map above (click to enlarge):
          • The likely route from the city of Lehi to the city of Moroni is shown in aqua, a distance of 67 kilometers.
          • The likely ancient coastline ca. 61 BC is shown in red. Note the known underwater archaeological site of Tiger Mound south of our proposed city of Moroni.
          • The black pyramids represent archaeological sites known to science per the EAAMS database.
          • Some of the archaeological sites that appear to be in open water are in fact on cays - tiny islands (e.g. Frenchman's Cay, Laughing Bird Cay).
          • The green line at the bottom of the map represents the boundary between the North American and Caribbean tectonic plates. This forms an escarpment of high cliffs that runs east-west from the Caribbean almost to the Pacific. This thin mountainous strip is our correlate for the line separating the Nephites on the north from the Lamanites on the south.
          • The precise location where we place the city of Moroni, in the water about 3 kilometers south south east of the mouth of the Rio Grande River in Toledo District, Belize, does show evidence of ancient ruins submerged in the shallow water according to reconnaissance work done by archaeologist V. Garth Norman.
          • If our proposed Nephite - Lamanite dividing line were extended to the likely ancient coastline extant at the time of Captain Moroni, our proposed city of Moroni would have been 14 kilometers from this line.
          In the middle of the night, while his comrades in arms were sleeping, Teancum climbed the wall surrounding the city of Moroni and rapelled down the inside slope. He located king Ammoron and killed him with a javelin thrust to the heart, forfeiting his own life in the process Alma 62:36. Narrative parallels with Amalickiah's death in Mulek six years earlier Alma 51:34 are intentional.
            The combined armies of Captains Moroni, Lehi and Teancum (deceased) drove the Lamanites out of the city and land of Moroni in short order Alma Alma 62:38 which ushered in eight years of peace and prosperity among the Nephites in the greater land of Zarahemla. This map shows the situation between the Nephites and Lamanites as the 31st year of the judges ended ca. 61 BC. Lamanite held territories on the south (the greater land of Nephi) are shown in white, the land Bountiful on the north is in green, and the greater land of Zarahemla lies between them. It is important to note that while the Nephites had settlements from the Caribbean to the Pacific and from Alta Verapaz to Tabasco, they did not control every square kilometer of this vast land. Large swaths of Maya and Zoque territory, for example, were never part of the Nephite republic and did not take direction from the city of Zarahemla. It is also important to note that large numbers of partially converted, partially assimilated ethnic Lamanites resided in the land of Melek.
            Lamanite held territory (in white) at the end of the 31st year
            of the judges ca. 61 BC following the liberation of Moroni
            Captain Moroni fortified those parts of the greater land of Zarahemla most vulnerable to Lamanite attack Alma 62:42, had his young son, Moronihah, appointed chief captain in his place Alma 62:43, and retired to his home in the city of Zarahemla Alma 62:42-43 at approximately 40 years of age ca. 60 BC. He died 4 years later Alma 63:3 (possibly from war wounds suffered in the battle of Mulek) while his beloved Nephite nation was still at peace.

            Google Earth Downloads

            $
            0
            0
            The following Google Earth kmz files are available for you to download. These files were a test of the download technology we are using. All 9 files are included in the comprehensive Book of Mormon Model.  Google Earth, available free of charge here, must be installed on your computer in order for you to open these files.
            Image of the Mesoamerican Rivers kmz file rendered in Google
            Earth. To download this file, click on the link below.
            Mesoamerican Rivers. Last Updated July 23, 2012 with the addition of the Tapanal and the Sacsi north west of Guatemala City in the vicinity of the proposed waters of Mormon. Rivers were the highways of the ancient world. In order to understand the Book of Mormon environment, one must have a good grasp of major drainage basins in the area. This Google Earth file plots dozens of river systems, with particular emphasis on the Usumacinta (shown in red), Grijalva (shown in blue) and Motagua (shown, along with all other rivers, in yellow). This file represents hundreds of hours of work and although quite useful, is still incomplete.
            --

            Image of the Isthmian Continental Divide kmz file rendered in
            Google Earth. To download this file, click on the link below.
            Isthmian Continental Divide. Last Updated June 27, 2012. A great deal of action in The Book of Mormon takes place in a narrow strip along the west coast and in the interface zone between the land southward and the land northward. In order to understand travel routes in this isthmian area straddling the modern Mexican states of Oaxaca and Chiapas, it is important to locate the ridge line separating Pacific and Atlantic watersheds. This Google Earth file plots the continental divide (shown in black) with representative elevation placemarks.
            --
            Image of the Isthmian Railroad kmz file rendered in Google Earth.
            To download this file, click on the link below.
            Isthmian Railroad. Last updated July 23, 2012 with color change from yellow to magenta to provide better visual contrast when overlaid with Mesoamerican Rivers. Since railroad track engineers are limited to gentle grades and wide curves, rail routes tend to make effective use of any given topography. This Google Earth file plots the rail line (shown in magenta) from Pijijiapan, Chiapas through the Isthmian part of Oaxaca and northward into Veracruz. The red circle indicates an area of particular interest where the Sierra Madre extends almost to the Pacific shoreline.
            --
            Image of the Olmec Sites kmz file rendered in Google Earth.
            To download this file, click on the link below.
            Olmec Sites. Last Updated July 5, 2012. The Olmec have long been considered the mother culture of Mesoamerica. An Egyptian - Olmec Connection has now been firmly established (see the article "Book Notice - Exodus Lost by Stephen C. Compton" in this blog). The Book of Mormon Jaredites were to some extent coeval and coterminus with the Olmec. This Google Earth file plots 75 Olmec and heavily Olmec-influenced sites (orange pyramid icons).
            --
            Image of the Zoque sites kmz file (partial content) rendered in Google Earth.
            To download this file, click on the link below.
            Zoque Sites. Last Updated July 14, 2012. The Zoque, derived from the Olmec, were a powerful regional culture headquartered at Chiapa de Corzo from ca. 900 B.C. to ca. 400 B.C. The large blue polygon represents their area of influence at apogee. The smaller blue polygon is the region in Chiapas known as La Frailesca, an area closely associated with the Zoque in late pre-classic times. This Google Earth file plots 16 Zoque sites (red pyramid icons).
            --
            Image of the Izapan Sites kmz file rendered in Google Earth.
            To download this file, click on the link below.
            Izapan Sites. Last Updated July 14, 2012. Izapa is a stylistically important site in the Soconusco Region (blue polygon) of Chiapas and Guatemala. Oriented to the towering volcanic peaks Tacana and Tajumulco, Izapa, which flourished ca. 300 B.C., is transitional between the Olmec and the Maya. It is generally considered the birthplace of the Maya calendar. This Google Earth file, based on the research of V. Garth Norman, plots 40 sites with Izapan influence (brown pyramid icons).
            --
            Image of the Teotihuacan Sites kmz file rendered in Google Earth.
            To download this file, click on the link below.
            Teotihuacan Sites. Last Updated July 16, 2012. Teotihuacan, in central Mexico near present-day Mexico City, began its ascendancy ca. 100 B.C. For the next 600 years, it was the most powerful military, economic and cultural force in Mesoamerica. This Google Earth file plots 17 sites with strong Teotihuacan influence (black pyramid icons).
            --
            Image of the Ancient Maya World kmz file (partial content) rendered in
            Google Earth. To download this file, click on the link below.
            Ancient Maya World. Last Updated July 16, 2012. The brilliant Maya civilization began ca. 1,500 B.C. and reached its classic period zenith ca. A.D. 600 - 800. Several thousand ancient Maya sites are known to science. This Google Earth file contains a variety of spatial data sets that help one visualize the ancient Maya.
            --
            Image of the Known Travels kmz file rendered in Google Earth.
            To download this file, click on the link below.
            Known Travels. Last updated July 16, 2012. A key metric in The Book of Mormon is one day's travel. In order to derive a working approximation for this standard measure, we analyzed 19 pre-industrial journeys throughout southern Mesoamerica (See the blog article "Land Southward Travel Times.") This Google Earth file plots these 19 known historical journeys. And, this Excel spreadsheet contains the distance calculations. To download the xlsx file, click on the link above and then click on File followed by Download.
            --

            V Garth Norman in Mexico City

            $
            0
            0
            Important Book of Mormon scholar, V. Garth Norman, has been invited by INAH to present his Izapa calendar studies at the National Museum of Anthropology in Mexico City on Friday, August 17th, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. in the Jaime Torres Bodet Auditorium. Norman recently gave a similar presentation sponsored by the Government of the State of Chiapas in Tapachula, the large city near the site of Izapa. This illustrated lecture (in English with simultaneous Spanish translation) is free of charge, but advance registration is required. Click on this link to access registration information.
            Advertisement for Garth Norman's presentation August 17, 2012
            at the National Museum of Anthropology in Mexico City
            Observant readers will notice a portion of the celebrated Izapa Stela 5 in the graphic above. This is the full image taken from Norman's 1973 NWAF publication "Izapa Sculpture Part 1: Album".
            Izapa Stela 5 from Norman "Izapa Sculpture"
            The scene on this monument has been highly controversial in the history of Book of Mormon research. In 1999 a new rendering was published by John E. Clark and Ayax Moreno in an attempt to radically re-interpret Stela 5's symbolism. The Clark - Moreno image is seriously flawed. Here is one of the original National Geographic photographs of Stela 5 from Matthew W. Stirling's 1941 expedition when the monument was freshly dug out of the ground and not nearly as weathered as it is today.
            Photograph of Izapa Stela 5 made in 1941 during Matthew W.
            Stirling's original National Geographic expedition 
            This earliest image corroborates Norman's 1973 rendition contra Clark - Moreno. INAH is currently building an Izapa sculpture garden in Tuxtla Chico, Chiapas using replicas of the monuments. When it is complete, it will be similar to La Venta Park in Villahermosa, Tabasco. INAH's replicas are based on Garth Norman's work.

            Book of Mormon Model

            $
            0
            0
            The following Google Earth kmz file is a comprehensive, though not exhaustive spatial model of Nephite cities, lands and places in the Book of Mormon. You must have Google Earth (available here free of charge) installed on your computer to open this file. All of the static images in the article "Book of Mormon Map" came from this model. The image below represents only a small fraction of the data in the model. As with all images on this blog, click to enlarge.
            Image of the Book of Mormon Model kmz file (partial content) rendered
            in Google Earth. To download this file, click on the link below.
            Book of Mormon Model. Last Updated August 21, 2012. This is the most ambitious attempt to date to correlate the text of the Book of Mormon with spatial data available in Google Earth. If you interpret the text as I (Kirk Magleby) do:

            north = north, east = east
            northward = northerly, southward = southerly
            narrow = narrow, small = small
            near & by = geographically proximate
            up = vertical rise, down = vertical drop
            center = middle or midpoint
            cross over = travel through a barrier, typically a mountain or river
            one day's travel = approximately 15 straight line (air) kilometers
            take journey (military version 'take march') = significant multi-day travel
            sea east to sea west = Atlantic (Caribbean) to Pacific
            round about = in a circular motion or pattern
            wilderness = territory, often sparsely populated, not under Nephite (or Lamanite depending on the referent) political control
            etc.

            then this correlation can be empirically demonstrated 100% using the powerful data sets & tools available in Google Earth. In other words, this model works. It fits the text precisely and consistently.
            --
            Antecedents. In 1976, M. Wells Jakeman taught his "Archaeology of the Book of Mormon" class for the final time at BYU prior to his retirement. I was fortunate to be in that class where all students were required to draw a Book of Mormon map. Mine was crude, mirroring my knowledge of the Book of Mormon text and Mesoamerica at the time, but I still have it. As I internalized some of Jakeman's passion for the Nephite scripture, I  sensed that I would return to this endeavor at some future date when I was prepared to make a contribution. So, to Professor Jakeman (who passed away in 1998) I am pleased to report that after 36 years I have finally created a Book of Mormon map that bears scrutiny.

            In 1979, John L. Sorenson and I met John W. Welch for the first time. After Welch moved to Provo the following year, the three of us were the early directors of the Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies (FARMS). I was privileged to help Sorenson in small ways with the publication of his watershed An Ancient American Setting for the Book of Mormon Salt Lake City: Deseret Book & FARMS, 1985. We spent many hours working with the cartographers at the University of Utah who prepared the splendid maps for that seminal publication. I have never been able to square John's geography model with my reading of the text, but my intellectual debt to him is incalculable. I am eagerly awaiting his magnum opus, Mormon's Codex, expected in September, 2013.

            In 2006, V. Garth Norman and I spent two weeks in central and southern Mexico. We had been on Mesoamerican expeditions together before, but this time Garth convinced me that his correlation of the narrow strip of wilderness was pivotal to an accurate understanding of Book of Mormon spatial relationships. I helped fund the initial publication of his "Book of Mormon - Mesoamerican Historic Geography Study Map" and several thousand copies of that important work are now in circulation among Book of Mormon students worldwide. About 80% of my Google Earth Book of Mormon Model is based on Garth's map. My work is essentially a refinement of the "Mormon-Norman" correlation.

            For the last several years, I have been an enthusiastic participant in the annual Book of Mormon Archaeological Forum (BMAF) "Lands of the Book of Mormon" Conference. This has given me the chance to rub shoulders with devoted Book of Mormon students such as Joseph L. & Blake J. Allen, Joe V. Andersen, Stephen L. Carr, Douglas K. Christensen, F. Richard Hauck, Lawrence L. Poulsen and Ted D. Stoddard. The Allens helped me sort out the Nephite east coast. Hauck & Andersen pioneered the correlation I now accept on the west coast. Larry Poulsen introduced me to the power of Google Earth. Ted Stoddard motivated me to commit my ideas to writing. And Steve Carr & Doug Christensen have helped me refine my presentation as we have collaborated on a weekly conference call.
            --
            The Text. I have made the bold assertion that this model fits the Book of Mormon text (my interpretation, which assumes that we can take the Elizabethan 'King James' English that fell from the Prophet Joseph's lips at face value a la 2 Nephi 25:7 & Alma 13:23) with no discrepancies. But, which version of the text? Royal Skousen's The Book of Mormon: The Earliest TextNew Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. Commonly called "The Book of Mormon Critical Text," Skousen's edition is essential for any serious Book of Mormon student who ferrets meaning from passages by carefully considering each word in context. See the article "Scribal Error" in this blog for examples of problems in the 1981 LDS text germane to any discussion of Book of Mormon New World geographical correlations. See the article "Bountiful - The Text" in this blog for examples of Royal Skousen's critical text emendations superimposed on the 1981 LDS text, highlighting the variant readings.

            The Book of Mormon was published in 1830. That was 182 years ago. Why has it taken us this long to produce an empirically verifiable Book of Mormon map? Part of the answer: We didn't have a widely accessible de facto standard text until the Yale University Press edition came out in 2009.
            --
            The Technology. The Book of Mormon text is often ambiguous. Therefore, solving the geography puzzle is a complex, multi-variate problem requiring best fit analysis across several hundred data points. That was dauntingly difficult before the advent of user-friendly Geographic Information System (GIS) software such as Google Earth. In August, 2011 when I began to write about this research odyssey, it was obvious that decades of wrangling over sub-disciplines of anthropology and paper maps had not and likely would not ever produce breakthrough results. We were arguing over which river was the Sidon in the 1970's and in 2011 we were still arguing. We were comparing a highly reliable source (the text) with subjective, evolving sources (the shifting sands of anthropological opinion).

            So, I posed a simple question: What if I compared one highly reliable source (the text) with other highly reliable sources (elevation, directionality, distance, topography, hydrology, population density, forest cover, etc.)? We might quibble now and again about textual exegesis, but it would be hard to discredit satellite imagery from NASA and ESA.
            --
            Results. Focusing first on the river Sidon, in about a month the question was settled to my satisfaction. The Usumacinta is a decisively better fit to the text than the Grijalva. See the blog article "Water Fight on the River - Round Nine." Analyzing individual Nephite polities convinced me that this Google Earth-based topographical approach facilites robust micro geographies that are capable of enriching our understanding of the text. See the blog articles "Ammonihah," "Gideon," "Hermounts," "Manti," "Melek," "Minon," and "Sidom." As the model came together in a way that many found clear and convincing (see the blog article "The Usumacinta/Sidon Correlation") I ventured to analyze the life and times of one iconic Book of Mormon hero whose detailed narrative accounts for about ten percent of the entire text. See the article "Captain Moroni in Space and Time" in this blog. The feedback was encouraging. Many, such as my friend Larry Stay (currently Guatemala City South Mission President), said they were excited to now understand the war chapters in Alma more logically and vividly than ever before.

            I posted a few teasers to test the feasibility of kmz file publication on Google infrastructure. See the article "Google Earth Downloads" in this blog. About a month later I had a version of the comprehensive Book of Mormon Model that I deemed worthy of publication. Note: all 9 of the Google Earth kmz files available individually on the "Google Earth Downloads" blog article are included in the much larger Book of Mormon Model. When you download the Book of Mormon Model you get the latest version of everything packaged in a single kmz file.
            --
            Breakthrough Insights. A handful of key relationships enabled the success of this model. 1) Ammonihah, Noah & Sidom were all east, not west of Sidon. See the blog articles "Ammonihah" and "The Usumacinta/Sidon Correlation" for extended treatments of this important paradigm shift. 2) The narrow neck really was narrow, southward from the east-west Bountiful-Desolation border. See the articles "Captain Moroni in Space and Time" and "Sidon East then West" in this blog for maps showing a number of correlations, including the narrow neck, clustered along the west coast. 3) Nephite settlement followed the rivers. See the blog articles "Expansion of the Nephite Nation" and "Sidon East then West" to visualize the Nephite republic's orderly, intiutive growth patterns. 4) If a place had a wilderness side, that topographic feature is distinguishable in modern geo-coded satellite imagery. See the blog articles "Ammonihah," "Manti" and "Melek" for salient examples. 5) The Nephites did not control all of the territory in the land southward north of the narrow strip of wilderness. Large areas such as the Mirador Basin in northern Peten were never part of the Nephite republic. See the article "Bountiful - Context" for a discussion of Nephite co-existence with their powerful neighbors. 6) One day's travel was a standard unit of measure in Nephite culture. See the blog article "Land Southward Travel Times" for a data-driven derivation of this fundamental metric. 7) The term "Zarahemla" has three distinct geographic meanings in the text: a) the local land of Zarahemla west of Sidon, b) the greater land of Zarahemla contiguous with and exclusive of the land Bountiful, and c) the continental land of Zarahemla inclusive of Bountiful, contiguous with the greater land of Nephi, and together with Nephi constituting the entire land southward. See the blog article "Zarahemla." Other lands with multiple geographic meanings include Bountiful, Desolation, Lehi and Nephi. The term "Lehi" is applied a single time to the entire land southward, in parallel with the term "Mulek" applied to the entire land northward Helaman 6:10. Most other references to "land" in the text refer to local lands or personal land holdings. "Lehi-Nephi" was a politically correct term used only in the first few years of the reign of King Zeniff. Before and after that brief window in time, the Nephite term was simply "Nephi."
            --
            Caveats. While I consider the current Book of Mormon Model a significant milestone in the history of Book of Mormon studies, it is still rough in a number of spots and far from finished. Lamanite lands in the greater land of Nephi are only partially analyzed. Jaredite lands have been largely ignored. Nephite toponyms with limited contextual referents (Angola, Boaz, David, etc.) are not yet included. Textual references hyperlinked to the online 1981 text hosted on lds.org are not yet consistently applied. Interested students will understand the model in greater depth if they will read the articles posted on this blog, few of which are currently hyperlinked in the model itself. Many more external corroborations, movements, battlefields, etc. will be forthcoming.
            --
            Prospectus. I expect this work will eventually lead to an illustrated Book of Mormon geographic commentary done with enough rigor that lay readers of the Nephite text worldwide will benefit.

            Sidon East then West

            $
            0
            0
            An interesting textual shift occurs at Alma 50:11, a passage describing events in the Nephite golden age ca. 72 - 71 B.C. Alma 50:23. Captain Moroni's ingenious fortifications worked so well at Noah (1,000+ Lamanites killed in action, 0 Nephites slain Alma 49:23) that the Nephites were busy erecting similar moats, walls & palisades around all of their settlements Alma 50:1. Nephite military forces cleared Lamanites from the east wilderness and drove them south of the east-west line that separated the greater land of Zarahemla on the north from the greater land of Nephi on the south Alma 50:7. Nephite settlers were brought in from the heavily populated local land of Zarahemla and environs to occupy the newly vacated eastern lands Alma 50:9. With the founding of the city of Moroni ca. 72 B.C. Alma 50:13 in the extreme south eastern corner of the greater land of Zarahemla, the process of colonizing the east coast that was well underway ca. 77 B.C. in the land of Jershon Alma 27:22 was nearing completion. Up to this point in the text, all of the action in the greater land of Zarahemla had been in the central riverine corridor and points east (all references to the west sea were in the lands of Bountiful and Desolation). Alma 50:11 marks an important turning point when the west began its ascendancy in Nephite affairs.

            The word series "north, south, east, west" was formulaic among the Nephites to mean omni directional 2 Nephi 29:11Mosiah 27:6, Helaman 1:31. The terms "east" and "west" as a duo are coupled 13 times in the text. The order is always east to west from Alma 22:27 through Alma 50:11. Then from Alma 50:34 to 3 Nephi 1:17 the order reverses and is always expressed west to east. To wit:
            Alma 22:27       ca. 90 B.C.  sea on the east and on the west
            Alma 22:27       ca. 90 B.C.  sea east even to the sea west
            Alma 22:27       ca. 90 B.C.  from the east towards the west
            Alma 22:29       ca. 90 B.C.  from the east to the west
            Alma 22:32       ca. 90 B.C.  from the east to the west sea
            Alma 22:33       ca. 90 B.C.  from the east unto the west sea
            Alma 50:8         ca. 72 B.C.  from the east sea to the west
            Alma 50:11       ca. 72 B.C.  in the east wilderness, yea, and also on the west
            -- Textual turning point --
            Alma 50:34       ca. 68 B.C.  on the west and on the east
            Helaman 3:8      ca. 46 B.C.  from the sea west to the sea east
            Helaman 4:7      ca. 35 B.C.  from the west sea, even unto the east
            Helaman  11:20 ca. 16 B.C.  from the sea west to the sea east
            3 Nephi 1:17      ca. A.D. 1    from the west to the east

            What is going on here? The text is telling us that in the ca. 72 B.C. time frame, the Nephite nation, having settled lands from the river all the way to the east coast, changed its focus from an eastward orientation to a westward outlook as the land northward assumed a much greater role in Nephite affairs. We are seeing the first manifestation of a 1) Sidon 2) east then 3) west pattern.

            This semantic shift is even more impressive when you realize that 5 of the 13 east, west couplets are describing features that are probably clustered within 30 kilometers of each other in the area along the west coast where the Sierra Madre reaches almost to the Pacific. Click to enlarge.
            Cluster of proposed Nephite geographic referents along the west coast
            near the modern boundary between Oaxaca and Chiapas 
            The textual transition is clear when we analyze the east west narrow strip of wilderness and the line separating the Nephites in the greater land of Zarahemla on the north from the Lamanites in the greater land of Nephi on the south. In this map, the narrow strip of wilderness is shown in green and the Nephite Lamanite line along its northern (uphill) edge in red.
            Narrow strip of wilderness (green) ran from the east sea to
            the west sea with the head of Sidon roughly at its midpoint
            Alma 22:27 first says that the northern boundary of the greater land of Nephi ran from the sea on the east to the sea on the west. It then says that the narrow strip of wilderness separating Nephites on the north from Lamanites on the south ran from the sea east to the sea west. Finally, it says that the narrow strip of wilderness ran from the east towards the west, passing by the head of the river Sidon with wilderness areas to its north. Alma 50:8 continues this same theme, adding that the eastern portion of the northern boundary of the greater land of Nephi was more rectilinear than curvilenear. In our correlation, this eastern portion of the boundary generally followed the Polochic/Dulce, roughly parallel to the Motagua.
            Eastern portion of the narrow strip of wilderness running
            in a straight course from the east sea to the west
            In Alma 50:11, though, this eastward primacy suddenly changes. We learn that by ca. 72 B.C.:
            • Nephite military forces for the first time drove Lamanites out of the wilderness west of the central Sidon corridor
            • The Nephites began fortifying the east west dividing line - the northern part of the narrow strip of wilderness that separated the Nephites on the north from the Lamanites on the south
            • for the first time, the narrow strip of wilderness was characterized as running from the west sea eastward to the head of Sidon rather than from the east sea westward
            • the Nephites for the first time had now begun to inhabit not only the land Bountiful but also the land northward beyond Bountiful. Alma 46:17 ca. 73 B.C. confirms that the Nephites by this time had settled the land Bountiful. 
            Going back 18 years to ca. 90 B.C., the text paints quite a different picture:
            • While the greater land of Nephi extended westward to the west sea, the greater land of Zarahemla did not. The west wilderness, full of idle Lamanites living in tents, was explicitly west of the greater land of Zarahemla Alma 22:28. The land of Melek was in the central Sidon corridor west of the river with nothing but wilderness west of Melek Alma 8:3.
            • While the Lamanites in the west wilderness were exploiting a Nephite settlement vacuum, the Lamanites in the east wilderness had been explicitly driven there by the Nephites' eastward expansion Alma 22:29.
            • With the exception of their defensive garrison on the west coast Alma 22:33 the Nephites had not yet inhabited the land Bountiful Alma 22:29.  
            These verses make the situation clear: by ca. 90 B.C. the Nephites in the greater land of Zarahemla had settled multiple lands along the central Sidon corridor including the land of Manti in the extreme south just north of the head of Sidon. They had established a defensive outpost in the land Bountiful along the west coast. And, they had begun expanding eastward, driving the Lamanites before them. The settlement of Jershon ca. 77 B.C. was a major milestone in this eastward movement. By ca. 72 B.C. the Nephites had expelled the Lamanites from the entire east wilderness area and were themselves establishing settlements along the east coast from the city of Bountiful on the north to the city of Moroni on the south. Having largely filled in their eastern lands, the Nephites ca. 72 B.C. began to finally turn their attention westward, driving the Lamanites out of the west wilderness and fortifying the east west narrow strip of wilderness line that separated the greater land of Zarahemla on the north from the greater land of Nephi on the south.

            In the greater land of Zarahemla, the Nephites settled:
            1. first, the river Sidon corridor beginning ca. 200 B.C.
            2. second, the east with settlement well underway by ca. 90 B.C. The second wave of eastern expansion near the east sea was going strong with the establishment of the land of Jershon by ca. 77 B.C. By ca. 72 - 67 B.C. there were many cities up and down the east coast.
            3. third, the west, beginning ca. 72 B.C.
            These conclusions come from analyses of two data sources: 1) the list of geographic referents organized by date of first mention in the text (as a surrogate for polity founding date) published in the blog article "Expansion of the Nephite Nation", and 2) a list of all occurrences of the words "Sidon," "east," and "west" organized by contextual date of the passage in which they appear. This second list is available as an Excel spreadsheet here. To download, click first on "File" and then on "Download."

            This map shows the first Nephite settlements in the river Sidon corridor, a single defensive outpost in the land Bountiful beside the west sea, and the beginnings of eastward expansion along the San Pedro river as per point #1 above.
            Nephite lands (in white) ca. 90 B.C. either
            explicitly attested or inferred in the text
            This map adds those lands included in the eastward expansion of the Nephite nation as per point #2 above. The black circles represent areas (Piedras Negras on the north, Altar de Sacrificios/Dos Pilas on the south) unlikely to have ever been under Nephite control at any time.
            Nephite lands (in white) ca. 67 B.C.
            explicitly attested in the text
            This map adds those lands mentioned in the text as part of the westward expansion of the Nephite nation as per point #3 above.
            Nephite lands (in white) ca. 66 B.C. attested in the text
            We can corroborate the Nephite settlement pattern outlined above by plotting the long string of Lamanite invasions and other military actions in and near the greater land of Zarahemla. These hostilities are organized in ascending chronological order from the time period ca. 200 B.C. when Mosiah1 first entered the local land of Zarahemla through the time period ca. 31 B.C. when the Lamanites permanently occupied the south half of the greater land of Zarahemla. In the Book of Mormon Model dated August 21, 2012 or later, these 35 military actions are in the battles folder labelled Z1 through Z35, the "Z" designation meaning the greater land of Zarahemla.
            1. King Benjamin, local land of Zarahemla & probably land of Minon, ca. 150 B.C. Omni 1:24, Words of Mormon 1:13-14
            2. Amlicites, hill Amnihu in land of Gideon, ca. 87 B.C. Alma 2:15-19
            3. Lamanites + Amlicites, local land of Zarahemla via land of Minon, ca. 87 B.C. Alma 2:27-28
            4. Lamanites, land of Minon, ca. 87 B.C. Alma 3:20-23
            5. Lamanites + Amulonites, land of Ammonihah, ca. 81 B.C. Alma 16:2, Alma 25:2
            6. Lamanites + Amulonites, land of Noah, ca. 81 B.C. Alma 16:3
            7. Captain Zoram & Sons, wilderness south of land of Manti & east of Sidon, ca. 81 B.C. Alma 16:7-8
            8. Captain Zoram & Sons, wilderness south of land of Manti & east of Sidon, ca. 81 B.C. Alma 25:3
            9. Lamanites, location not specified, ca. 78 B.C. Alma 16:12
            10. Lamanites, east wilderness south of newly settled land of Jershon, ca. 77 B.C. Alma 28:1-3
            11. Zerahemnah (Lamanites + Zoramites + Amlicites (critical text emendation for "Amalekites"), southern border of Jershon & northern border of Antionum, ca. 74 B.C. Alma 43:18
            12. Zerahemnah, east of Sidon, south of land of Manti, ca. 74 B.C. Alma 43:36-38
            13. Zerahemnah, west of Sidon, south of land of Manti, ca. 74 B.C. Alma 43:41
            14. Amalickiah, wilderness south of the land of Manti, ca. 73 B.C. Alma 46:32
            15. Lamanites + Zoramites, city of Ammonihah, ca. 72 B.C. Alma 49:11
            16. Lamanites + Zoramites, city of Noah, ca. 72 B.C. Alma 49:21-23
            17. Morianton, narrow pass near the west sea Bountiful/Desolation border, ca. 68 B.C. Alma 50:33-35
            18. Amalickiah, cities of Moroni, Lehi, Morianton, Omner, Gid & Mulek along the east seacoast, ca. 67 B.C., Alma 51:22-26. Note: the term "Nephihah" in Alma 51:26 is a known error in the text. Royal Skousen's critical text correctly emends this word to read "Moroni."
            19. Teancum, southern border of the land Bountiful near the east seacoast, ca. 67 B.C. Alma 51:28-31
            20. Ammoron, cities of Manti, Zeezrom, Cumeni & Antiparah, ca. 66 B.C. Alma 56:13-14
            21. Helaman & Antipus, west sea area north of Antiparah, ca. 65 B.C. Alma 56:49-54
            22. Jacob, northwest of the city of Mulek near the east coast, ca. 64 B.C. Alma 52:31-36
            23. Helaman & Gid, Cumeni on the south western border of the greater land of Zarahemla, ca. 63 B.C. Alma 57:17-22
            24. Moroni, city of Gid on the east coast, ca. 63 B.C. Alma 55:20-23
            25. Helaman, Gid & Teomner, city of Manti on the extreme southern border of the greater land of Zarahemla, ca. 63 B.C. Alma 58:27-29
            26. Lamanites, city of Nephihah in the south eastern quarter of the greater land of Zarahemla, ca. 62 B.C. Alma 59:7-8
            27. Moroni & Parhoran (critical text emendation of "Pahoran"), north of the city of Nephihah, ca. 61 B.C. Alma 62:14-15
            28. Moroni & Parhoran, city of Nephihah, ca. 61 B.C. Alma 62:23-26
            29. Moroni, Lehi & Teancum, city of Moroni, ca. 61 B.C. Alma 62:38
            30. Moronihah, location not specified, ca. 53 B.C. Alma 63:15
            31. Coriantumr, city of Zarahemla, ca. 51 B.C. Helaman 1:19-20
            32. Moronihah & Lehi, north of the local land of Zarahemla, south of land Bountiful, ca. 51 B.C. Helaman 1:28-30
            33. Lamanites, all of the greater land of Zarahemla, Nephites driven into land of Bountiful, ca. 34 B.C. Helaman 4:5-6
            34. Moronihah, west sea to the east along a fortification line 1 day's journey in length, ca. 33 B.C. Helaman 4:7
            35. Moronihah, northern half of the former Nephite homelands in the greater land of Zarahemla, ca. 31 B.C. Helaman 4:9-10
            This map shows military actions 1 - 8 in and near the greater land of Zarahemla through ca. 81 B.C. Action 9, ca. 78 B.C. has no provenance in the text, so cannot be mapped. Note that all of these engagements are in the central Sidon corridor or slightly east of it as the Nephite settlement data predicts for this time period.
            Military actions through ca. 78 B.C. Nephite victories
            are shown as red icons, Lamanite victories as blue
            This map adds military actions 10 - 19 with dates through ca. 67 B.C. Note that all of these hostilities are in the central Sidon corridor or the east, except for one area near the Bountiful/Desolation border on the west sea. Again, the hostilities map mirrors the Nephite settlement map for this time period.
            Military actions through ca. 67 B.C. - central Sidon corridor,
            points east, and a single defensive outpost by the west sea
            This map adds military actions 20 - 32 with dates through ca. 51 B.C. when the Nephite nation had begun settling the west. Action 30 has no provenance in the text, so cannot be mapped.
            Military actions through ca. 51 B.C. Nephite victories in red
            Lamanite victories in blue
            In ca. 34 B.C., the Lamanites conquered all of the greater land of Zarahemla, forcing the Nephites into the land Bountiful and beyond. The following year, the Nephites set up a fortified east west line along the west coast. This map represents military actions 33 & 34. The white overlays represent the greater lands of Nephi and Zarahemla, both under Lamanite control in ca. 33 B.C.
            Military actions through ca. 33 B.C. when the Lamanites
            had conquered the entire greater land of Zarahemla
            In ca. 31 B.C., the Nephites under Captain Moronihah regained the northern half of their former territories. This map shows the reduced Lamanite possessions, again as a white overlay. Note how the proposed lands recaptured by Moronihah follow the San Pedro river, northern tributary of the Usumacinta. The lands that from ca. 31 B.C. on were permanent Lamanite territory follow the Pasion river, southern tributary of the Usumacinta.
            Military actions through ca. 31 B.C. when the Nephites
            had regained one half of their former territory
            Summary: The Nephites settled the central Sidon corridor from Zarahemla on the north to Manti on the south early in their history. They established a defensive outpost at a key point on the west coast, then began to expand eastward, probably following tributaries of the Sidon. Every Nephite polity in the greater land of Zarahemla referenced in the text through ca. 67 B.C. was along the central Sidon corridor or in the east. The Nephite westward expansion began in ca. 72 B.C. with the first place names in the west appearing in the text 4 years later. The textual semantic, settlement and military action data all match this Sidon - east - then west pattern.

              The Church in Zarahemla

              $
              0
              0
              We begin with an interesting research question: Could we locate the seven churches Alma1 founded in the greater land of Zarahemla Mosiah 25:23 ca. 120 B.C.? Terms of  interest in the text include variations of:
              • baptize
              • church
              • establish
              • ordain
              • order
              • people of God
              • priests and teachers
              • regulate
              Alma1 founded a church in the wilderness of Mormon near the local land of Nephi ca. 147 B.C. Mosiah 18:17, Mosiah 23:16 when he was about 26 years old. We derive his age by calculating backward from Mosiah 29:45. 27 years later, ca. 120 B.C., Alma1 and his flock of several hundred Mosiah 18:35 arrived in the local land of Zarahemla Mosiah 24:25 where King Mosiah2 immediately recognized Alma's priesthood and moral authority Mosiah 25:14. Soon, Alma1 had founded seven churches throughout the greater land of Zarahemla Mosiah 25:23.

              Had the church existed in the greater land of Zarahemla before Alma1 arrived ca. 120 B.C.? Yes. King Benjamin called priests to teach the gospel Mosiah 6:3 and Ammon at the court of King Limhi knew he held priesthood authority to baptize although he felt personally unworthy to exercise it Mosiah 21:33. But, Alma1 was such a towering spiritual figure that King Mosiah2 entrusted him with ecclesiastical affairs Mosiah 26:8 as the senior high priest Mosiah 26:7 throughout the greater land of Zarahemla.

              How large were the church congregations Alma1 established? The text does not say, but we have some parameters to consider:
              • As a young church leader in the land of Mormon, Alma1 consecrated one priest for every fifty congregants Mosiah 18:18. Multiple priests and teachers were ordained for each church unit Mosiah 25:19 in Zarahemla. So, a few hundred believers was probably the minimum number required to plant a new church.
              • Another name for churches was "bodies" Mosiah 25:21. The text explicitly says the church bodies in Alma's day were large Mosiah 25:15.
              • One criterion for dividing people into a new church body was simply the number of people who could gather in one place and listen to a speaker together Mosiah 25:20. This implies an upper limit of several thousand members per congregation.
              • In the great awakening that followed the Amlicite war, about 3,500 people joined the church throughout the greater land of Zarahemla in one year Alma 4:5
              We know that Alma1 regulated the affairs of the church Mosiah 26:37 supported by an able lay ministry Mosiah 27:5. During his 29 year tenure as the presiding high priest in the greater land of Zarahemla, many people were baptized Mosiah 26:37, some of them by Alma1 himself Mosiah 25:18. The aged leader ordained his son, Alma2 , to succeed him as high priest over the church Mosiah 29:42 and passed away ca. 91 B.C. at age 82 Mosiah 29:45. The text is silent about Alma's journeys on the preaching circuit or specifics about any individual church. We do know that the church of God was generally established throughout all the lands subject to King MosiahMosiah 25:19, Mosiah 27:35. So, where were these lands and churches?

              Fortunately, Almawas one of the principal Nephite record keepers and we have detailed information about his life and ministry. Soon after Almawas ordained high priest by his father and given charge over all the affairs of the church, he was also appointed chief judge by the voice of the people Mosiah 29:42. He occupied this dual role for approximately eight years from ca. 91 B.C. to ca. 83 B.C. Alma 4:18. During those years, he presided over capital cases Alma 1:14, led the Nephite armies in battle Alma 2:16, and baptized many in the waters of Sidon Alma 4:4. Then, in the ninth year of the reign of the judges, Almaturned the chief judgeship over to Nephihah Alma 4:20 and began his famous missionary journeys bearing pure testimony Alma 4:19.

              Alma2 taught and ordained priests and teachers to preside and watch over the church that was previously established in the city of Zarahemla Alma 6:1. So, we know that one of the seven churches founded by Alma1 was in the capital city of Zarahemla. Alma 5:1-2 implies that there were other churches in the local land of Zarahemla in addition to the one in the principal city. Analyzing ancient settlement pattern data in our proposed local land of Zarahemla, three densely populated regions stand out - the Emiliano Zapata area which we correlate with the city of Zarahemla, the Balancan area, and the Palenque area. These regions are shown as white circles (average radius 12.5 kilometers) in the map below.
              3 areas with large populations anciently in our proposed
              local land of Zarahemla
              We propose that three of Alma's seven churches were in the local land of Zarahemla, roughly corresponding to the locations indicated in the map above.

              Alma2 then crossed the river and taught and established the order of the church in the land of Gideon as he had previously done in Zarahemla Alma 8:1. The church in Gideon, though, was already established before Alma's arrival Alma 6:8. In fact, Alma2 apologized to the good people of Gideon - since becoming high priest over eight years ago, he had never before communicated with them face to face Alma 7:1. From this we learn that one of the seven churches founded by Alma1 was in the land of Gideon.
              One of Alma's seven churches was in Gideon
              Next on Alma's itinerary was the land of Melek west of the river. Almataught and baptized Alma 8:4-5 in Melek as he had previously done in Zarahemla. This verbiage indicates he was working within an existing church organization as a visiting authority with convening power rather than calling leaders and planting a new church. So, another of Alma's seven churches was in the land of Melek.
              Proposed land of Melek west of Sidon, another of
              Alma's original seven churches
              After Melek, Almaventured into hostile territory in apostate Ammonihah three day's north of Melek Alma 8:6. The church of Nehor, later led by Amlici, was headquartered in Ammonihah Alma 14:16-18, Alma 15:15, Alma 16:11. Nevertheless, the text makes it clear that prior to Nehor and Amlici the church of God had been established in Ammonihah.
              • Nehor's preaching, particularly successful in Ammonihah, disparaged the true church Alma 1:3
              • Nehor preached against the prevailing order of lay ministry among priests & teachers Alma 1:3
              • Alma's original intent in Ammonihah was to teach and baptize just as he had done in Zarahemla and Melek Alma 8:8-10
              • Amulek was a Nephite living in predominantly Amlicite Ammonihah Alma 8:20. Discussing events five years earlier, Mormon emphasized the contemporary meaning of the term "Nephite" in the post-Amlicite war era Alma 3:11. Thus, Amulek was a believer, a member of the church of God, albeit one who had backslid during much of his adult life Alma 10:5-6. Almadid not have to baptize or ordain his missionary companion.
              • Even though the Amlicites held a deep-seated aversion to the Nephite scriptures Alma 14:8, copies were widely available among the people of Ammonihah Alma 14:1.
              Therefore, we suggest that one of Alma's seven original churches was in the land of Ammonihah. 
              Proposed land of Ammonihah where the true church once existed
              The seventh church we believe was probably in the land of Minon south of and upstream from the local land of Zarahemla, although nothing in the text explicitly indicates this. The only other candidates might be the lands of Noah or less likely, Manti, or the city of Aaron, all attested in the text by ca. 82 B.C. By the time of  Almaand the four sons of Mosiah2, Manti was well-established along the north south Zarahemla to Nephi corridor Alma 16:7, and eventually Almaattempted to travel there Alma 17:1. In the ca. 120 B.C. time frame, though, when Almafounded the seven churches, people were still getting lost trying to travel between Nephi and Zarahemla and vice versa (see the blog article "Water Fight on the River - Round Five"). It is not likely that Manti was part of the Nephite nation at that early date. Noah and Aaron are less likely than Minon simply because they are further away from the local land of Zarahemla. When Almagot to the land of Sidom, ca. 81 B.C., he founded the church there Alma 15:13. Sidom was distant enough from the Nephite culture core it had only recently been brought into Zarahemla's orbit. The same was probably true for Noah and Aaron. So, we propose that one of Alma's seven churches was in the land of Minon.
              Proposed seven churches in the greater land of Zarahemla
              Mosiah 27:2 says that the seven churches founded by Almawere in the "land round about" the city of Zarahemla. Mosiah 27:32 adds that they were "round about through all the land". The red line shows our interpretation of this circularity.
              Seven churches in the land round about Zarahemla
              How far distant were the seven church bodies from each other? In our correlation above, the red circle has a radius of 65 kilometers. The text says Alma's most arduous journey Alma 8:3 on this circuit was the one from the city of Zarahemla to Melek, shown in magenta on the map below. The term "take journey" in Nephite parlance implies long, tough travel.
              Proposed journey from the city of Zarahemla to the land of Melek
              The Zarahemla to Melek journey plotted above runs for 135 air (straight-line) kilometers which would require about 9 day's travel according to our standard metric (see the blog article "Land Southward Travel Times"). Highest elevation en route: 388 meters.

              The text evidences an all too human pattern of societal upheaval followed by resurgent interest in religion. Some examples:
              • In Mosiah 25, ca. 120 B.C., Nephite society in the greater land of Zarahemla was fundamentally transformed with the influx of Alma's and King Limhi's peoples. King Mosiahauthorized Alma1 to establish churches throughout all the land Mosiah 25:19.
              • In Alma 4, ca. 86 B.C., the Nephites were suffering because of the severe devastation brought on by the Amlicite war Alma 4:2-3. They began to establish the church more fully and many were baptized Alma 4:4.
              • In Alma 45, ca. 73 B.C., the war with Zerahemnah caused massive casualties Alma 44:21 and major disruptions in the church Alma 45:21. Helaman led a nationwide renewal throughout the church organization Alma 45:22.
              • In Alma 62, ca. 57 B.C., following the lengthy war with Amalickiah/Ammoron, the church was in disarray. Once again, Helaman led a resurgence throughout all the land Alma 62:44-46.

              Ammonihah Noah & Sidom all East of Sidon

              $
              0
              0
              On Thursday, August 2, 2012 I had a lengthy conversation with John L. Sorenson following his excellent presentation at the FAIR Conference about his forthcoming book, Mormon's Codex. I promised to send him an article demonstrating from the Book of Mormon that the associated Nephite polities Ammonihah, Noah and Sidom were all east of Sidon, not west of the river as most students of the text have assumed for more than 100 years. This is that article in PDF format: Ammonihah Noah & Sidom all East of Sidon. Since many browser-based PDF viewers lack functionality, you may wish to click on File and Download to read the PDF in a native viewer on your local machine.
              --
              Some of this material was presented at the 10th Annual BMAF Lands of the Book of Mormon Conference held at the Salt Lake Sheraton on Saturday, October 20, 2012. You can view that presentation in this YouTube video filmed and edited by Robert Starling. The first 13 minutes of the video deal with the Ammonihah East of Sidon issue. The final 47 minutes of the video show John W. (Jack) Welch and me presenting a history of Book of Mormon Studies in the 20th Century.
              --
              My intent with this material is to be provocative. I believe the Book of Mormon deserves to be taken seriously by much larger audiences worldwide. Demonstrating a verifiable New World setting after 182 years (1830 - 2012) would go a long way toward establishing the kind of credibility that would invite global interest in the book. Book of Mormon geography has been a fringe topic within LDS culture for generations, mired in ambiguity which has bred controversy. With the confluence of Royal Skousen's critical text, detailed historical-contextual exegesis from scholars such as Grant Hardy, and the unprecedented power and accessibility of Google Earth, significant progress toward a viable consensus map now seems possible. This article is an attempt to move the dial in that direction.
              --
              Ammonihah, Noah & Sidom all East of Sidon
              For well over a century, almost all Book of Mormon geography models have located the associated Nephite polities Ammonihah, Noah and Sidom west of river Sidon. Here are a few examples, beginning with Jeremy Skidmore's artistic representation.
              Ammonihah, Noah and Sidom, west of river Sidon, outlined in red
              Joel Hardy originated this handy block diagram. Notice that he posits two cities of Aaron, one near Ammonihah and another east of the river near Nephihah and Moroni.
              Ammonihah, Noah and Sidom, west of river Sidon, outlined in red
              This useful image came from a presentation Steve Carr gave in 2008 at the 6th Annual BMAF Lands of the Book of Mormon Conference in Salt Lake City.
              Ammonihah, Noah and Sidom, west of Sidon, outlined in red
              John L. Sorenson's highly influential internal map has received wide distribution.
              Ammonihah, Noah and Sidom, west of Sidon, outlined in red
              P. Douglas Kiester is a dedicated student of the text with many innovative ideas. His Sidon is in northwestern Colombia just south of Panama.
              Ammonihah, west of Sidon, outlined in red
              The late Daniel H. Ludlow first created this internal map. Versions of it have been widely published in Church Educational System (CES) manuals.
              Ammonihah, Noah and Sidom, west of Sidon, outlined in red
              Joseph L. Allen is the dean of Book of Mormon tour guides. He and his son, Blake, published this map in 2008. Their Sidon is the Grijalva River in southern Mexico.
              Ammonihah, west of Sidon, outlined in red
              We could continue multiplying examples, but you get the idea.













              Isthmuses

              $
              0
              0
              I have the pleasure of conversing with V. Garth Norman frequently. He is one of the most astute students of the Book of Mormon in our generation. He, along with many others, believes the narrow neck of land referenced in Alma 63:5Ether 10:20 and possibly Alma 22:32 is the entire Isthmus of Tehuantepec in southern Mexico. I do not believe the text supports that correlation. This article will place Tehuantepec in context among the isthmuses of the world to lay the foundation for relevant Book of Mormon exegesis.

              Geographers identify the Isthmus of Tehuantepec as that land in Mexico between the 94th and 96th meridians of west longitude. Its surface area (including water) is 57,629 square kilometers. That is larger than any of the 9 smallest states in the U.S. and nearly the size of West Virginia.
              • 14.40 times larger than Rhode Island, 4,002 square kilometers
              • 8.94 times larger than Delaware, 6,447 square kilometers
              • 4.01 times larger than Connecticut, 14,357 square kilometers
              • 2.55 times larger than New Jersey, 22,588 square kilometers
              • 2.38 times larger than New Hampshire, 24,216 square kilometers
              • 2.31 times larger than Vermont, 24,901 square kilometers
              • 2.11 times larger than Massachusetts, 27,336 square kilometers
              • 2.04 times larger than Hawaii, 28,311 square kilometers
              • 1.79 times larger than Maryland, 32,133 square kilometers
              • 91.83% as large as West Virginia, 62,755 square kilometers
              The Isthmus of Tehuantepec is larger than dozens of countries on earth including Croatia (56,594 square kilometers), Denmark (43,094 square kilometers), Taiwan (36,193 squarer kilometers) or Israel (20,770 square kilometers). Placing a north-south transect at the narrowest point, the width of the isthmus between the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of Campeche) and the Pacific Ocean (Gulf of Tehuantepec) is 216 kilometers. Placing an east-west transect between the 94th and 96th meridians of west longitude, the length of the isthmus is 211 kilometers. The Isthmus of Tehuantepec, as defined by geographers, is shows as a white polygon on the map below. As with all images on this blog, click to enlarge.
              Isthmus of Tehuantepec in white, surface area 57,629 square kilometers
              Parts of 4 Mexican states are included in the isthmus: Oaxaca, Veracruz, Tabasco and Chiapas. The name comes from the Oaxacan town of Santo Domingo Tehuantepec. The name "Tehuantepec" derives from the Nahuatl "tecuani-tepec" or "jaguar hill". Shortly before the Spanish conquest, the Aztecs conquered Santo Domingo Tehuantepec, but only after a prolonged siege battle. The locals fought ferociously from fortified positions on a prominent hill (summit 120 meters) east of the Tehuantepec River. This Google Earth view shows the hill just above the yellow line representing the Tehuantepec River, on the right hand side of the image with the modern town built up around it.
              Modern town of Santo Domingo Tehuantepec showing jaguar hill
              Because the natives fought like jaguars on their hill, the Aztecs named the place tecuani-tepec.

              4 major river systems drained the isthmus during Book of Mormon times: the Papaloapan, Coatzacoalcos, Tehuantepec and Mezcalapa-Grijalva (today the Tonala). On the  map below, the Mezcalapa-Grijalva system (as it flowed in Book of Mormon times - see the article "Wandering River" in this blog) is in blue, the Usumacinta is in red, other rivers are in yellow, the continental divide is in white, and the trans-isthmian railroad is shown in magenta. It requires 302 kilometers of track for the railway to connect Salina Cruz, Oaxaca with Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz. The railroad crosses the continental divide at Chivela Pass, altitude 224 meters.
              Isthmian rivers, continental divide and railroad
              Chivela Pass funnels prevailing winds, known as Tehuanos, from south to north. Occasionally, contrary winds blow through the pass in the opposite direction, from north to south, with such force that they have been known to sandblast paint from ships in the Gulf of Tehuantepec. The largest wind power project in Latin America is currently under development on the Oaxacan side of the isthmus. Elevations within the isthmus range from 2,500 meters to sea level. Five different climatic zones are present in this area. The following map shows the world standard Koppen climate classification system for Mexico.
              Koppen climate map of Mexico showing five zones within the isthmus
              In general, the southern side of the isthmus is much drier than the northern side. This is graphically shown in a NASA true color satellite image taken in April at the height of the dry season.
              NASA Blue Marble image of the isthmian region in April
              Satellite images of the earth's lights at night provide a good visual representation of relative population density. Notice that in the Tehuantepec region, both coasts are heavily populated while the interior Selva Zoque remains largely in its natural state.
              NASA image of the earth's lights at night
              This same pattern held true anciently. Plotting archaeological sites known to science from the EAAMS database, we find settlement activity on both coasts with a large blank spot in the middle.
              Known archaeological sites
              The point is that the Isthmus of Tehuantepec is a very large place with a great deal of physiographic and cultural diversity. How large is it? It is the widest isthmus on the planet (Panama is the longest). Geographers consider anything wider than Tehuantepec part of a continental land mass rather than an isthmus. Some geographers even consider Tehuantepec too wide to be classified as an isthmus. Here is a comprehensive, although not exhaustive, list of generally accepted isthmuses (aka isthmi) organized in ascending order by width at the narrowest point:
              Isthmuses of the World
              IsthmusBetweenandWidth (km)Notes
              Bruny Island, TasmaniaNorth BrunySouth Bruny0.04
              Olympia, WashingtonWest OlympiaEast Olympia0.04
              Nahant, MassachusettsNahantMasachusetts0.06
              Quetrihue, ArgentinaQuetrihue PeninsulaNeuquen, Argentina0.09
              Mavis Grind, Shetland IslandsNorth Mavine PeninsulaShetland0.11
              La Coupee, Sark, Channel IslandsLittle SarkSark0.12
              Eaglehawk Neck, TasmaniaTasman PeninsulaTasmania0.14
              Portland Beach, U.K.Portland BillDorset, England0.16
              Bardsey Island, U.K.North BardseySouth Bardsey0.19
              Derbyhaven, U.K.Langness PeninsulaIsle of Man0.20
              Coronado, CaliforniaCoronado IslandCalifornia0.25
              Saint Pierre and Miquelon, NewfoundlandIsland of MiquelonLanglade Island0.25
              Sutton, Dublin, IrelandHowthIreland0.37
              Cape Clear Island, IrelandGathabawnCape Clear0.43
              Kushimoto, JapanCape Shiono-MisakiHonshu Island0.47
              Catalina Island, CaliforniaWestern CatalinaEastern Catalina 0.61
              Munoz Gamero Peninsula, ChileMunoz GameroChile0.80
              Madison, WisconsinLake MendotaLake Monona0.93
              Bolbs, SpainGibraltarSpain1.08
              Potidea, GreeceKassandra PeninsulaGreece1.08
              East Falkland IslandNorthern East FalklandSouthern East Falkland1.24
              Sechelt, British ColumbiaSechelt PeninsulaCanada1.25
              Llondudno, WalesGreat OrmeWales1.29
              Rongotai, New ZealandMiramar PeninsulaNorth Island, N.Z.1.31
              Similk Beach, WashingtonFidalgo IslandWashington1.75
              Tarbert, ScotlandKintyre PeninsulaScotland2.17
              2.96median
              Auckland, New ZealandNorthern PeninsulaNorth Island, N.Z.3.75
              Seattle, WashingtonPuget SoundLake Washington4.00
              Medanos, VenezuelaMedanos PeninsulaVenezuela4.05
              Summerside, Prince Edward IslandWestern P.E.I.Prince Edward Island4.12
              Carlos Ameghino, ArgentinaValdes PeninsulaChubut, Argentina5.07
              Avalon, NewfoundlandAvalon PeninsulaNewfoundland5.75
              Corinth, GreecePeloponnese PeninsulaGreece5.80etymological origin
              Perekop, CrimeaCrimeaUkraine9.46
              Westfjords, IcelandWestfjords PeninsulaIceland9.47
              Rhins of Galloway, ScotlandGalloway PeninsulaScotland9.60
              Maui, HawaiiWest MauiMaui11.00
              Quezon, PhilippinesBicol PeninsulaLuzon12.00
              Punta Arenas, ChileBrunswick PeninsulaChile15.00
              Rivas, NicaraguaLake NicaraguaPacific Ocean18.00
              20.20mean
              Ofqui, ChileTaitao PeninsulaChile21.00
              Chignecto, Nova ScotiaNova ScotiaCanada24.00
              Adam's Bridge (former isthmus), IndiaIndiaSri Lanka29.00
              Catanzaro, ItalyCalabria PeninsulaItaly30.00
              Kra Isthmus, ThailandMalay PeninsulaAsia43.00
              Karelian Isthmus, RussiaGulf of FinlandLake Ladoga46.00
              Forth-Clyde, ScotlandScottish HighlandsCentral Lowlands50.00
              PanamaCentral AmericaSouth America57.00
              Suez, EgyptSinai PeninsulaEgypt122.00
              Olonets, RussiaLake OnegaLake Ladoga125.00
              Onega, RussiaLake OnegaWhite Sea154.00
              Tehuantepec, MexicoNorth AmericaCentral America216.00
              20.20mean
              2.96median
              If you want to play around with the data, you can download the Excel spreadsheet here by clicking on file, then download.

              The word "isthmus" derives from the Greek "isthmos" meaning "neck". The use of the term in geography originated with the Isthmus of Corinth which is 5.80 kilometers wide at its narrowest point.
              Isthmus of Corinth (Korinthos) in Greece
              The Isthmus of Corinth joins the Peloponnese Peninsula to the Greek mainland. It is about 7.45 kilometers long and has a surface area of approximately 56 square kilometers. The modern Greek village of Isthmia is at the narrowest point of the isthmus.

              The Isthmus of Tehuantepec is 37 times wider (216 kilometers/5.80 kilometers) than the Isthmus of Corinth which defines the genre.
              Viewing all 358 articles
              Browse latest View live