Quantcast
Channel: BOOK of MORMON RESOURCES
Viewing all 358 articles
Browse latest View live

Early Modern English

$
0
0
Scholars of English demarcate eras in the evolution of the language. The date ranges below reflect the fact that not all scholars agree on the precise beginning and ending points.
  • A.D. 450 was the beginning of Old English which continued until A.D. 1100 - 1170.
  • A.D. 1100 - 1170 was the beginning of Middle English which continued until A.D. 1300.
  • A.D. 1300 was the beginning of Late Middle English which continued until A.D. 1470 - 1500.
  • A.D. 1470 - 1500 was the beginning of Early Modern English which continued until A.D. 1670 - 1700. (Some even put the end of Early Modern English as late as A.D. 1800 e.g. The History of English.)
  • A.D. 1670 - 1700 was the beginning of Modern English aka Late Modern English which has become Earth's lingua franca.
Some milestones along the way:
  • Geoffrey Chaucer's Canterbury Tales were written in Late Middle English about 1380.
  • The first book in English printed on a printing press appeared in Late Middle English in 1475 in Bruges (now Belgium). The first printing press on English soil began operation in 1476.
  • Between 1590 and 1613 William Shakespeare wrote the 37 plays in his canon in Early ModernEnglish.
  • In 1611 the first edition of the King James Version of the Bible was published in Early Modern English. Predecessors included the Tyndale New Testament in 1526 and the Coverdale Bible in 1525.
  • In 1755 Samuel Johnson's Dictionary of the English Language helped standardize the Modern English we use today.
  • The first edition of the monumental Oxford English Dictionary was published in 1928 in ten bound volumes. The most cited work in the OED: various editions of the Bible. The most cited author: William Shakespeare. Shakespeare's most cited play: Hamlet
In 1994 Royal Skousen, Professor of Linguistics and English Language at BYU, published an article entitled "The Original Language of the Book of Mormon: Upstate New York Dialect, King James English, or Hebrew?" in Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 3.1. Based on his meticulous research with the earliest manuscripts of the text, Skousen came to the startling conclusion that the original language of the first edition of the Book of Mormon was Early Modern English.

Four years later, Skousen published another important article entitled "How Joseph Smith Translated the Book of Mormon: Evidence from the Original Manuscript" in Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 7.1 (1998). Skousen argued the Prophet Joseph was not at liberty to articulate ideas in his own vernacular, but rather the translation process was under divine "tight control."

Between 2004 and 2009 Skousen published his important 6 volume Analysis of Textual Variants of the Book of Mormon. They were followed by the seminal The Book of Mormon: The Earliest Text (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2009), the version of the text we now commonly refer to as the "Yale edition." The Yale edition attempts to reconstruct the text as it fell from the lips of the Prophet at the moment of translation. As such, it has quickly become the de facto standard for scholarly analysis of the Book of Mormon.

Through close reading of the Yale Edition and the Oxford English Dictionary, linguist Stanford Carmack has now found significant new evidence supporting Skousen's theses:
  • The language spoken by the Prophet to his scribes during translation was in large degree Early Modern English.
  • The translation process was carefully controlled by a higher power.
Carmack, son of Emeritus General Authority John K. Carmack, received his bachelor's degree in linguistics from Stanford. He then got his J.D. from Stanford and a Ph.D. in Hispanic Languages and Literature from UC Santa Barbara. He has worked professionally as a technical writer and editor.

His article is entitled "A Look at Some 'Nonstandard' Book of Mormon Grammar" in Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture Vol. 11 (2014). Skousen came to his conclusions largely through a painstaking analysis of Book of Mormon vocabulary. Carmack's second witness comes from his study of grammar and syntax.

Why did the Lord render the text of the Book of Mormon in a vocabulary and syntax that predated the translation by approximately 120 - 350 years? One likely reason was so the text sounded Biblical with an affinity to the King James Version. Another likely reason was to grace the already awe-inspiring Nephite masterpiece with yet another miracle. The Book of Mormon got a great deal of Old World culture right (a convenient survey of the data is in Donald W. Parry, Daniel C. Peterson, and John W. Welch, editors, Echoes and Evidences of the Book of Mormon, (Provo, UT: BYU and FARMS, 2002). It got hundreds of Mesoamerican cultural nuances right (the best current summary is in John L. Sorenson, Mormon's Codex: An Ancient American Book, (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book and Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship, 2013). And, as we are showing in this series of blog articles, it got hundreds of points of Mesoamerican geography right. That's a lot to ask of a prophet who was only 24 years, 3 months old when the book went on sale for the first time in Palmyra, NY on March 26, 1830. Now add the fact that the text was in a language not spoken by Joseph Smith, Jr. or any of his father's or grandfather's generation. One is left spell-bound with respect for the prodigy of it all. This is another powerful witness that the Nephite corpus did in fact come forth "by the gift and power of God" As Moronisays on the Title Page.  

Necks of Land

$
0
0
Now that we know the Lord's language target for the Book of Mormon (see the blog article "Early Modern English") was the Tudor period into the Stuart period (1500's and 1600's), we are prepared to investigate one of the most contentious phrases in the text, the "small neck of land"Alma 22:32 aka "narrow neck"Alma 63:5 aka "narrow neck of land"Ether 10:20. What would English speakers in the Elizabethan, Jacobean and Caroline eras have considered a "neck" of land? How large would a neck of land have been? Would a neck have been surrounded by fresh water, estuarial water, salt water, some combination of waters or no water at all?

Fortunately, we have a great deal of data to work with that will help us answer these questions. During the Tudor and Stuart periods, waves of English colonists founded settlements from Nova Scotia to Georgia and beyond. They originated thousands of place names including hundreds of "necks" of land whose names still appear on modern maps. We will use Google Earth to analyze a statistically significant (though far from exhaustive) sample of 115 necks of land named by English settlers. Our conclusions will help us determine what kind of geographic feature we should be looking for when we try to locate Mormon's and Moroni's "narrow neck" on the modern map.

This article expands and extends the previous series of blog articles "Isthmuses,""Narrow and Small Things,""Another Geographic Neck,""The Narrow (Small) Neck of Land," and "The Narrow Pass and Narrow Passage."

David R. Ransome published an article entitled "Village Tensions in Early Virginia: Sex, Land, and Status at the Neck of Land in the 1620s" in The Historical Journal Vol. 43, No. 2 (June, 2000), Cambridge University Press. That particular neck of land is a meander in the James River downstream from modern Richmond in contemporary Chesterfield County. The famous Fry-Jefferson map of Virginia (Peter Jefferson was Thomas' father) first published in 1751 calls it simply "Neck of Land."
Neck of Land south of the James River settled by the 1620's
The same 1751 map shows at least 2 other necks of land in Virginia. One is Henrico Neck in modern Henrico County.
Henrico Neck north of the James River
The other is Savith (modern Savage) Neck in modern Northampton County on Virginia's Eastern Shore.
Savith Neck jutting into Chesapeake Bay
These are the 115 necks of land in our study:

NameLocationTypeWidth (km)
Arbuckle NeckAccomack County, VA1 fresh 2 estuary1.80
Bailey NeckAccomack County, VA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 estuary0.70
Baylys NeckAccomack County, VA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 estuary1.34
Bell NeckAccomack County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 estuary0.63
Big NeckBrunswick County, NC1 fresh 2 fresh15.74
Boone NeckBrunswick County, NC1 fresh 2 estuary 3 estuary1.60
Boston NeckSuffolk County, MA1 fresh 2 estuary1.97
Boston NeckWashington County, RI1 fresh 2 salt1.40
Bradford NeckAccomack County, VA1 fresh 2 estuary0.98
Brickhouse NeckNorthampton County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary0.26
Broad Neck (earliest)Anne Arundel County, MD1 fresh 2 fresh 3 salt1.10
Broad Neck PeninsulaAnne Arundel County, MD1 fresh 2 fresh 3 salt5.93
Broad NeckLancaster & Northumberland Counties, VA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 salt15.94
Broadway NeckAccomack County, VA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 salt1.64
Broro NeckMcIntosh County, GA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 estuary0.53
Bush NeckJame City County, VA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 fresh0.37
Cherry Point NeckNorthumberland County, VA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 salt1.67
Church NeckNorthampton County, VA1 fresh 2 fresh0.80
Coles NeckWestmoreland County, VA1 estuary 2 salt 3 salt1.98
Copiague NeckSuffolk County, NY1 fresh 2 fresh 3 salt0.99
Cove NeckNassau County, NY1 salt 2 salt 3 salt1.27
Crabtree NeckHancock County, ME1 salt 2 salt 3 salt2.24
Craddock NeckAccomack County, VA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 salt2.40
Crane NeckSuffolk County, NY1 salt 2 salt0.78
Curles NeckHenrico County, VA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 fresh2.30
Custis NeckAccomack County, VA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 estuary1.72
Eagle NeckMcIntosh County, GA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 estuary1.41
Eaglehawk NeckTasmania, Australia1 salt 2 salt0.11
East NeckSuffolk County, NY1 salt 2 salt 3 salt3.00
Eastern NeckNorfolk County, MA1 salt 2 salt 0.18
Eatons NeckSuffolk County, NY1 salt 2 salt 3 salt1.64
Elk NeckCecil County, MD1 salt 2 salt7.83
Elliotts NeckNorthampton County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary1.89
Eyrehall NeckNorthampton County, VA1 salt 2 salt 3 salt0.89
Eyreville NeckNorthampton County, VA1 salt 2 salt 3 salt0.92
Finneys NeckAccomack County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 estuary0.67
Glebe NeckMiddlesex County, VA1 fresh 2 fresh0.30
Gravel NeckSurry County, VA1 estuary 2 salt 3 salt2.77
Great East NeckSuffolk County, NY1 fresh 2 fresh 3 salt1.05
Great NeckAccomack County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary0.22
Great NeckBristol County, MA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 fresh1.08
Great NeckEssex County, MA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 estuary0.75
Great NeckNassau County, NY1 salt 2 salt3.13
Great NeckNorthampton County, VA1 estuary 2 salt0.39
Great NeckSuffolk County, NY1 fresh 2 fresh 3 salt1.37
Hacks NeckAccomack County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 salt3.41
Harris NeckMcIntosh County, GA1 estuary 2 estuary0.75
Hog NeckAccomack County, VA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 estuary1.72
Holt NeckNorthampton County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary0.41
Horton NeckSuffolk County, NY1 salt 2 salt 3 salt1.07
Houghs NeckNorfolk County, MA1 salt 2 salt 3 salt0.31
Indian NeckBarnstable County, MA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 salt0.40
Indiantown NeckNorthampton County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 estuary 1.96
Johns NeckSuffolk County, NY1 fresh 2 salt 3 salt2.76
Jones NeckChesterfield County, VA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 fresh0.94
Joynes NeckAccomack County, VA1 fresh 2 estuary 3 estuary1.59
Knotts NeckSuffolk, VA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 salt1.23
Little East NeckSuffolk County, NY1 fresh 2 estuary 3 salt0.59
Little NeckEssex County, MA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 estuary 0.31
Little NeckQueens County, NY1 fresh 2 salt0.73
Little NeckSuffolk County (north), NY1 salt 2 salt0.52
Little NeckSuffolk County, NY1 fresh 2 fresh 3 salt0.76
Lloyd NeckSuffolk County, NY1 salt 2 salt 3 salt 2.36
Long NeckSussex County, DE1 estuary 2 estuary 2.10
Lower NeckNorfolk County, MA1 salt 2 salt 3 salt 0.18
Machodoc NeckWestmoreland County, VA1 estuary 2 salt 3 salt1.63
Marlborough NeckStafford County, VA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 estuary1.48
Mathias Point NeckKing George County, VA1 estuary 2 salt 3 salt2.47
Middle Neckbetween Rappahannock & York Rivers, VA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 salt19.75
Mill NeckNassau County, NY1 estuary 2 estuary 3 salt1.36
Milners NeckSuffolk, VA1 fresh 2 fresh1.64
Mondays NeckNorthumberland County, VA1 fresh 2 estuary 3 estuary0.48
Narrow Neck (earliest)Aukland, New Zealand1 estuary 2 salt0.11
Narrow NeckAukland, New Zealand1 estuary 2 salt1.02
Narrow NeckNew South Wales, Australiaknifepoint mountain ridge0.85
NarrowneckQueensland, Australia1 fresh 2 salt0.09
Newport NeckWorcester County, MD1 estuary 2 estuary 1.18
Northern Neckbetween Potomac & Rappahannock Rivers, VA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 salt12.01
Occohannock NeckNorthampton County, VA1 estuary 2 salt2.90
Old NeckNorthampton County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 salt0.46
Old NeckSuffolk County, NY1 estuary 2 estuary 3 salt0.50
Old Town NeckNorthampton County, VA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 salt1.29
Parker NeckAccomack County, VA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 estuary2.06
Pecatone NeckWestmoreland County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 salt1.17
Pine Pole NeckPender County, NC1 fresh 2 fresh5.51
Porters NeckNew Hanover County, NC1 fresh 2 fresh 3 estuary2.55
Quaker NeckSuffolk, VA1 fresh 2 fresh1.61
Salem NeckEssex County, MA1 salt 2 salt 3 salt`0.48
Sampawams NeckSuffolk County, NY1 estuary 2 estuary 3 salt0.73
Santapogue NeckSuffolk County, NY1 fresh 2 estuary 3 salt0.81
Saquish NeckPlymouth County, MA1 salt 2 salt0.13
Savage NeckNorthampton County, VA1 estuary 2 salt1.30
Scarborough NeckAccomack County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 salt1.41
Sconticut NeckBristol County, MA1 salt 2 salt0.33
Scotland NeckHalifax County, NC1 fresh 2 fresh8.29
Scotland NeckSurry County, VA1 fresh 2 estuary 3 salt1.66
Sluitkill NeckAccomack County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 salt2.07
Smith NeckBristol County, MA1 fresh 2 fresh 3 salt2.92
Smith NeckIsle of Wight County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 estuary0.72
Stodders NeckPlymouth County, MA1 estuary 2 salt 3 salt0.15
Stove Point NeckMiddlesex County, VA1 salt 2 salt0.19
Strongs NeckSuffolk County, NY1 salt 2 salt 3 salt0.35
Timber NeckMiddlesex County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 salt1.01
Timber NeckSurry County, VA1 fresh 2 fresh0.59
Upper NeckNorfolk County, MA1 salt 2 salt0.24
Upshur NeckAccomack County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary 0.85
Virginia aka Southern Neckbetween York & James Rivers, VA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 salt8.31
Walnut NeckSuffolk County, NY1 salt 2 salt0.53
Wellington NeckNorthampton County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary0.97
West NeckSuffolk County (north), NY1 salt 2 salt 3 salt2.35
West NeckSuffolk County, NY1 salt 2 salt1.16
Weyanoke NeckCharles City County, NY1 fresh 2 fresh2.89
Whites NeckAccomack County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 estuary1.57
Wilson NeckNorthampton County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary2.41
Yeo NeckAccomack County, VA1 estuary 2 estuary 3 estuary 1.19
Mean Width2.00
Median Width1.18
Minimum Width0.09
Maximum Width19.75
Fresh count80
Estuary count103
Salt count109

During the colonial era, English speakers used the word "neck" to identify small to medium-sized peninsulas or land bridges surrounded by any combination of rivers, inlets, tidal basins, bays, sounds or oceans. Some necks in our sample (41/115) have 2 sides terminating in a point such as Crane Neck on Long Island.
Crane Neck, Suffolk County, New York
We classify Crane Neck as type 1 salt 2 salt meaning it has 2 sides, both exposed to salt water. The yellow line on the map above shows the point at which we took our width measurement, .78 km.

Other necks (74/115) have 3 sides such as Gravel Neck jutting into Chesapeake Bay.
Gravel Neck, Surry County, Virginia
We classify Gravel Neck as type 1 estuary 2 salt 3 salt meaning it has 3 sides with the first bounding an estuary and the other two exposed to salt water. Gravel neck is 2.77 km wide at the point indicated.

Most necks in our sample (113/115) are peninsular land forms protruding from a larger land mass such as Eastern Neck near Weymouth, Massachusetts which has Lower Neck protruding from it and Upper Neck protruding from Lower  Neck.
Eastern Neck, Norfolk County, Massachusetts
Two necks in our sample are isthmian land forms bridging two much larger land masses. One of those is Eaglehawk Neck in extreme southern Australia. Eaglehawk Neck, .11 km wide, is the second narrowest neck in our sample.
Eaglehawk Neck, Tasmania
The other is Narrowneck Beach on Australia's famed Gold Coast near Brisbane. Narrowneck Beach is a .09 km wide tongue of land between the Pacific Ocean to the east and a small branch of the Nerang River to the west. Narrowneck Beach is the narrowest neck in our sample.
Narrowneck, Queensland
Both examples of isthmian necks are from Australia whose English settlement began in 1788 when the First Fleet sailed into Botany Bay (modern Sydney) and founded a penal colony.

One of our sample necks is not surrounded by water. Narrow neck near Katoomba, Australia is a cliff-lined sandstone peninsula less than 1 km wide separating Jamison Valley on the east from Magalong Valley on the west.
Narrow Neck, New South Wales shown with 3X vertical exaggeration
The other 114 necks of land in our sample are surrounded by some combination of fresh, estuarial and salt water. We have classified 16 different combinations:

Neck TypeCount
1 fresh 2 fresh9
1 fresh 2 fresh 3 fresh4
1 fresh 2 estuary3
1 fresh 2 fresh 3 estuary8
1 fresh 2 estuary 3 estuary3
1 fresh 2 salt3
1 fresh 2 fresh 3 salt13
1 fresh 2 estuary 3 salt 3
1 fresh 2 salt 3 salt1
1 estuary 2 estuary10
1 estuary 2 estuary 3 estuary9
1 estuary 2 salt5
1 estuary 2 estuary 3 salt13
1 estuary 2 salt 3 salt5
1 salt 2 salt12
1 salt 2 salt 3 salt13
Total114

It is obvious from these counts that our sample tends strongly toward estuarial and salt waters.

Nine of the necks of land in our study carry diminutive names (the words "little" or "narrow") implying small size. As we would expect, the mean width of these nine is significantly smaller (.55 km) than the mean width of the entire sample set (2.0 km).

Thirteen of the necks of land in our study carry augmentative names (the words "big,""broad,""great," or "long) implying large size. As we would expect, the mean width of these thirteen is significantly larger (3.88 km) than the mean width of the entire sample set (2.0 km).

Of course we're interested in any neck of land that includes the word "narrow" in its name. Two examples from Australia are illustrated above. A third is from Devonport Peninsula on Aukland, New Zealand's north shore. Originally this peninsula had a very narrow (.11 km wide) causeway and beach separating its north and south components, with a large mangrove swamp to the west. This small strip of land was called "Narrow Neck. In the 1850's, the swamp was drained and a racetrack constructed. Today the reclaimed land is a golf course, Narrow Neck is an Aukland suburb with about 3,600 inhabitants and a popular urban beach.
Narrow Neck, Aukland. The width measures the causeway before
the swamp was drained and the land to the west reclaimed
Conclusions.
Based on our analysis of 115 geographic features English-speaking colonists called a "neck of land" we answer the three questions posed at the beginning of this article and posit three characteristics we will likely find in the Book of Mormon narrow (small) neck of land.
  1. It will be a peninsula rather than an isthmus. 113/115 of the examples in our study are peninsulas and only 2 are isthmuses.
  2. It will be on the order of 2.0 km wide. Our 115 examples average 2.0 km in width.
  3. It will front salt water and estuarial water. 101/115 examples in our study have an exposure to the sea or an estuary
Correlations.
The Isthmus of Tehuantepec fails 2 of our 3 criteria.
  1. It is an isthmus.
  2. It is 216 km wide.
  3. It fronts both the open ocean and estuaries.
Barra San Marcos near Tonala, Chiapas, our proposed narrow (small) neck of land, fits all 3 criteria beautifully.
Barra San Marcos, Tonala, Chiapas
  1. It is a peninsula.
  2. It is 2.0 km wide.
  3. The seaward side fronts the Pacific Ocean, while the landward side fronts an extensive network of estuarial lagoons.
Furthermore, a number of the necks of land in our study have physical characteristics quite similar  to Barra San Marcos. Examples include:
Bell Neck, Accomack County, Virginia
Bradford Neck, Accomack County, Virginia
Brickhouse Neck, Northampton County, Virginia
Great Neck, Accomack County, Virginia
Harris Neck, McIntosh County, Georgia
Holt Neck, Northampton County, Virginia
Saquish Neck, Plymouth County, Massachusetts
Upshur Neck, Accomack County, Virginia 

Romance Languages

$
0
0
It is instructive to see how LDS translators have handled the "neck" passages (Alma 22:32, Alma 63:5 and Ether 10:20) in the Spanish, Portuguese, French and Italian versions of the Book of Mormon.
Portuguese Book of Mormon
Spanish
Alma 22:32     pequeña lengua de tierra     (small tongue of land)
Alma 63:5       estrecha lengua de tierra     (narrow tongue of land)
Ether 10:20     estrecha lengua de tierra     (narrow tongue of land)

Portuguese
Alma 22:32     pequena faixa de terra         (small strip of land)
Alma 63:5       estreita faixa de terra           (narrow strip of land)
Ether 10:20     faixa estreita de terra           (narrow strip of land)

French
Alma 22:32     étroite bande de terre           (narrow strip of land)
Alma 63:5       langue étroite                       (narrow tongue)
Ether 10:20     langue étroite de terre          (narrow tongue of land)

Italian
Alma 22:32      stretta lingua di terra           (narrow tongue of land)
Alma 63:5        stretto istmo                         (narrow isthmus)
Ether 10:20      stretta striscia di terra          (narrow strip of land)

"Tongue of land" appears 6 times in this list, "strip of land" 5 times and "isthmus" once.

A "tongue" of land in any language generally means a peninsula projecting out from the mainland, although it is applied occasionally to an isthmus connecting two much larger land masses. The Oxford English Dictionary (online edition) defines the 13a sense of meaning for the word "tongue" as "a narrow strip of land, running out into the sea, or between two branches of a river, or two other lands." The OED entries for the word "strip" imply something long and narrow of uniform breadth. The 1b sense of meaning for the word "strip" is "a long narrow tract of territory, of land, wood, etc.) The OED also includes the curious and now rare English word "lingula" derived from classical Latin whose 3rd sense of meaning is "a small promontory, projection or tongue of land or rock."The OED entry for "isthmus" deriving from Greek through Latin is "a narrow portion of land, enclosed on each side by water, and connecting two larger bodies of land; a neck of land. Other terminology referenced in the OED include "narrow portions of land,""narrow slip of land," and "narrow passage of land."

The point of all this lexical gyration is that the romance language translators of the Book of Mormon tend toward a peninsular rather than an isthmian interpretation of the English term "narrow neck of land." This agrees precisely with the results we obtained by analyzing 115 necks of land known throughout the English-speaking world. See the blog article "Necks of Land." Our proposed Book of Mormon narrow neck of land, the long and slender Barra San Marcos along the Pacific coast of Chiapas, fits comfortably within this range of meaning.

OED on Necks of Land

$
0
0
Noah Webster's 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language appeared just two years before the Book of Mormon. In the early 1980's as FARMS was beginning its contribution to Mormon scholarship, we were excited to see what we could learn about the meanings of Book of Mormon words and phrases from Webster's classic tome. Thirty years later we now know the earliest English version of the Nephite text has a much closer affinity with the older language of Shakespeare and the King James Bible. See the blog article "Early Modern English." The indispensable dictionary for exegesis of Mormon's and Moroni's abridgments can only be the incomparable Oxford English Dictionary commonly called the OED. Textual scholars such as Royal Skousen and Stanford Carmack use the OED extensively.

We used the OED to articulate the meanings of the terms "tongue of land,""strip of land," and "isthmus" in the blog article "Romance Languages." We will now plumb the depths of the OED to shed more light on the key Nephite phrases:
  • small neck of land between the land northward and the land southward Alma 22:32.
  • narrow neck which led into the land northward Alma 63:5.
  • by the narrow neck of land, by the place where the sea divides the land Ether 10:20.
Necks of Water
We first note that a "neck" can also refer to a marine feature. Straits, sounds and inlets are sometimes called "necks of water," particularly if they are quite narrow. So the Book of Mormon usage "neck of land" is not redundant given its coastal nature.

Small Necks of Land
The obsolete word "halover" is a variant of "haul over" meaning portage where seafarers had to carry their boats from the ocean over a spit of land before they could launch them again in an inland waterway. Haulover Beach in North Miami, Florida is one place where this word persists. Beginning in 1697 (the Early Modern English era) an English privateer (pirate) and adventurer began publishing memoirs of his voyages and discoveries around the world. Because he was a keen observer and facile wordsmith, William Dampier's writings became very popular. Dampier describes a trip he took in 1676 along the coast of Tabasco. This image is from Captain William Dampier edited by John Masefield, Dampier's Voyages (London: E. Grant Richards, 1906) Vol. 2, pp. 214-5 displayed in Google Books.
Captain William Dampier Voyages (1676)
Dampier's Halover is a coastal sandbar running between the Gulf of Campeche and Laguna Santana aka Laguna Machona and Laguna Redonda. This sandbar is what Dampier called a "small Neck of Land." It is .27 km wide at the point indicated.
Dampier's Small Neck of Land, Tabasco
On modern maps the sandbar is called Barra del Panteon with Barra Tupilco to the east and Barra de Santa Ana to the west. The sense of "haul over" persists on the map above in the Spanish word "arrastradero" which means "portage."

We propose Barra San Marcos on the Pacific coast of Chiapas as the narrow (small) neck of land in the Book of Mormon. It is also a coastal sandbar fronting a series of saltwater lagoons. Barra del Panteon and Barra San Marcos are nearly identical geographic features 270 air kilometers distant from each other in southern Mexico. One was described in Early Modern English as "a small neck of land." Another may be the feature described in an Early Modern English text (the Book of Mormon) as "a small neck of land."

Another Early Modern English usage of the term "small neck of land" comes from the ancient city of Tyre in modern Lebanon. Tyre is on a tiny peninsula jutting into the Mediterranean.
Tyre, Lebanon on a Peninsula .5 km Wide
Anglican clergyman Thomas Fuller published an Early Modern English book entitled The historie of the holy warre (Cambridge: T. Buck, 1639) where he described Tyre "tacked to the continent with a small neck of land."

Between
"Betwixt" is archaic. The sense is "by twin" meaning a third entity (c) in close relationship with two other entities (a & b) where a & b share significant commonalities. So, for instance, in geographic usage a river or plain may lie between two cities. A fence or wall may lie between two farmer's fields. A mountain ridge may lie between two valleys. The word often conveys either a line of movement or communication between a & b, or an obstacle dividing a from b. In Early Modern English, c was adjunct to both a & b, not integral with either of them.

Alma 22:32 and 3 Nephi 3:23 describe the actual border between the land northward (Desolation) and the land southward (Bountiful) as a line. The narrow (small) neck of land was not this line. It was a coastal feature along the west sea in the vicinity of this line. Our correlation of the narrow (small) neck of land with a coastal sandbar fits this scenario nicely. The neck was not the  land northward nor was it the land southward. It was separate from both these lands, but in line with them and a conduit of movement and communication between them.

Narrow
Something is narrow when its breadth or width is small compared with its length. A long lane or street with houses or fields on either side is narrow. Egyptian settlement along the banks of the Nile is narrow. The northern arms of the Red Sea on either side of the Sinai Peninsula are narrow.
Narrow Egyptian Settlement along the Nile, Narrow Arms of the Red Sea
The Isthmus of Tehuantepec as defined by geographers is not narrow. Its width exceeds its length.
Isthmus of Tehuantepec 211 km Long X 216 km Wide
The narrow neck of land as envisioned by John L. Sorenson, V. Garth Norman and many others is not narrow. Its width greatly exceeds its length. In the representation below, the width is 6.75 times greater than the length, the exact opposite of the OED definition of "narrow."
Proposed Narrow Neck of Land 32 km long X 216 km wide
Our proposed narrow neck of land, on the other hand, conforms precisely to the OED definition of "narrow"
Barra San Marcos 52 km Long X 2 km Wide
Narrow Land
In 1640 a farmer in Scunthorpe, North Lincolnshire was conveyed one "narrow land." At that time in England, fields were often divided into narrow strips. The example shown is .26 km wide.
Strips of Land around Scunthorpe, North Lincolnshire
Narrow Necks of Land
"Halse" or "hals" was an old Scottish word for "neck." Hector Boece wrote his celebrated The History and Chronicles of Scotland in Latin in 1527. John Bellenden translated it into Scottish vernacular in 1536. Describing the region of Nidisdail (modern Nithsdale), Boece/Bellenden wrote "It beginnis with ane narow and strait hals, and incressis mair braid." In contemporary English we would render "It begins with one narrow and strait neck, and increases more broad." This 1726 map of Scotland shows the narrow southern neck of Nithisdale (Nithsdale), approximately 5 km wide.
Nithisdale (Nithsdale) in Southern Scotland
During the 1600's when the basic geography of the New World was beginning to be widely understood, the Isthmus of Darien aka Panama was called a "narrow neck of land" or similar. Panama is 52.77 km wide at its narrowest point and 900 km long on its Atlantic coastline from the Colombia border on the south to the Costa Rica border on the north. Panama clearly conforms to the OED definition of "narrow."
Isthmus of Panama 
"America is not unfitly resembled to an Hour-glasse, which hath a narrow neck of land ... betwixt the parts thereof." Thomas Fuller, The holy state, 1642

"America is ... divided by that Isthmus, or necke and narrow passage of Land at Darien, into two parts." Samuel Purchas, Purchas his pilgrimage, 1613

"Next is that necke or narrow extent of Land ... knitting the two great Peninsuls of the North and South America together." Samuel Purchas, Purchas his pilgrimage, 1613

Necks of Land
French maps from the 1600's were the first to name the Niagara Peninsula. The name comes from the Mohawk language and means "neck of land (between the lakes)." The Niagara Peninsula is 37.21 kilometers wide at its narrowest point.
Niagara Peninsula Surrounded by Water on Three Sides
In the late 1700's, a British naturalist called the narrow sandbar fronting Portland harbor a "neck of land." It is .18 km wide.
Neck of Land along the Dorset Coast
"On the neck of land joining Portland to Dorsetshire." William Withering, An Arrangement of British Plants..., 1796

In the late 1600's, the area between the Firth of Forth to the east and the Firth of Clyde to the west was called a "neck of land." This territory is 54.61 km wide on the line indicated.
Neck of Land across Central Scotland
"The Neck of Land between the two Fryths about Sterling and Glasco." William Temple, An Introduction to the History of England, (London: Richard and Ralph Simpson, 1699)

Kent Island in Chesapeake Bay was first colonized in 1631, the earliest European settlement in what is now Maryland. By 1640 about a dozen land patents had been granted on the island and surveyors were busy marking boundaries and certifying claims. Kent Island has three "necks of land" that appear on the modern map: Batts Neck, Cox Neck and Crab Alley Neck. Survey records from 1640 document many other necks of land. For example: "Laid out for Thomas Keyne the Neck of Land called hog penn Neck, lyeing between thcketty Creek on the North, hog pen Creek on the South Chesapeak Bay on the West and a Meridian line drawn from the head of Thicketty Creek, to the head of hog pen Creek on the East Containing 100 acres."Maryland Historical Magazine Vol. 5, 1910 "Land Notes, 1634 - 1665" We would classify Hog Pen Neck 1 fresh 2 fresh 3 salt using the system outlined in the blog article "Necks of Land."
The Northern Portion of Kent Island, Queen Anne's County, Maryland
Land Neck
"Land-neck" is an obsolete word meaning isthmus. "At the very entrance of the Isthmus, or land-necke." Florus, translated by Edmund Mary Bolton, The Roman Histories of Lucius Juluis Florus ..., 1619

Neckland
"Neckland" is an obsolete word meaning a neck or narrow strip of land. "The Promontories and necklands which butt into the the Sea, what are they but solide creekes." George Hakewell, An Apologie of the power and providence of God, 1627

Led into
The sense of "lead in" or "lead into" is to conduct or guide along a path. Gates lead into courtyards. Anterooms lead into larger rooms. Footpaths lead into forests. "Passing from hence through the Sala Regia againe, I was led into the great roome hard by." Richard Lassels edited by Simon Wilson, The voyage of Italy, 1670.

"Led into" is used four times in a geographic context in the Book of Mormon.
  • Alma 52:9 the narrow pass led into the land northward.
  • Mormon 3:5 the narrow pass led into the land southward.
  • Alma 63:5 the narrow neck led into the land northward.
  • Mormon 2:29 the narrow passage led into the land southward.
All three features (narrow pass, neck & passage) were very near the actual border, the line between the lands southward and northward Alma 22:32, 3 Nephi 3:23. The narrow passage was right on the border Mormon 2:29. All three were distinctive enough to function in the role of independent gate or path leading into the much larger and more substantial lands northward and southward. This map shows our correlations,
Proposed Narrow (Small) Neck, Narrow Pass, Narrow Passage
and Bountiful/Desolation Border Line
We propose that:
  • the narrow (small) neck of land is Barra San Marcos. The black lines show the modern road traversing the length of the sandbar, intersecting at right angles with Cabeza de Toro road.
  • the narrow pass is the Mexican railroad grade shown as the purple line skirting around Cerro Bernal and Laguna de la Joya.
  • the narrow passage is the mountain pass at the Agua Dulce River where Mexican Federal Highway 200, shown in light blue, runs today.
  • the Bountiful.Desolation line is the red line that runs from a point high in the Sierra Madre westward to Mar Muerto. 
On the map above, the yellow lines are rivers emptying into the Pacific. The white line is the continental divide and the blue lines are rivers in the Mezcalapa - Grijalva drainage basin. Green pushpins represent geographic features mentioned in the text. Yellow pushpins are elevation markers.
These correlations fit the sense of "led into" brilliantly.
  • The narrow (small) neck route led only into the land northward.
  • The narrow pass, flanking a mountainous ridge that crosses over the Bountiful/Desolation line, can lead either northward or southward depending on one's location at the time. When the Nephites were in land Bountiful, the narrow pass led northward Alma 52:9. When the Nephites were in land Desolation, the narrow pass led southward Mormon 3:5.
  • The narrow passage was right on the Bountiful/Desolation border line, so movement could go either way. When the Nephites were in land Desolation, the narrow passage led southward Mormon 2:29.
The fact that three transportation corridors exist today (coast road, railroad, highway) through this area lends credibility to the Book of Mormon account of three geographic features providing access between the lands southward and northward.

We could constructively consult the OED for the terms "narrow pass" and "narrow passage" but our scope in this article is the narrow (small) neck of land.

Necks
A neck is a constriction, a pinch point. Vertebrates have necks. Bottles, flasks and jars have necks. To some degree, the words "neck" and "narrow" are redundant because most necks are longer than they are wide. Necks are usually associated with peninsulas that protrude like a head from a body. Isthmuses that connect two larger bodies are also called necks. The complex topography of the Crimean Peninsula, for instance, has several features that are called necks and/or isthmuses almost interchangeably."The upwold, or high level part of the neck [of the isthmus]." Alexander William Kinglake, The Invasion of Crimea, 1875. The narrowest part of a mountain pass can be called a neck. "Monsieur Medavi...was to advance towards the Neck of the Mountains at Ceurs."The London Gazette No. 4359/2, 1709.
Necks around Mount Hope Bay between Massachusetts & Rhode Island
"Mount-Hope, Pocasset and several other Necks of the best land in the Colony." William Hubbard, A narrative of the troubles with the Indians in New-England, 1677

Divides
The verb "divide" means to partition, cleave or cut into pieces. The narrow (small) neck of land was geographically proximate to a place where the sea divides the land Ether 10:20. This place could not have been an isthmus. An isthmus by definition is a place where the land divides the sea. This place must have been an inlet of the ocean or an outlet (mouth) where an inland saltwater lagoon breaches a sandbar. Along the Pacific coast of Oaxaca and Chiapas, the mouth of a lagoon is called a "boca" which is Spanish for "mouth." The map below shows three of these bocas, highlighted by white circles.
Boca de San Francisco, Boca del Mar Muerto & Boca del Cielo
The Boca del Mar Muerto is large enough (.56 kilometers wide) that ocean-going vessels transit it regularly. It divides the Barra San Marcos to the east from Barra de Tonala to the west in the land/sea/land pattern the text describes. Mar Muerto is home to the largest fishing fleet in southern Mexico.
Boca del Mar Muerto in Context
We propose that Boca del Mar Muerto at the northwestern end of Barra San Marcos and the southeastern end of Barra de Tonala is the place where the sea divides the land and one of the ports on the extreme eastern end of Mar Muerto is the place Hagoth built and launched his remarkable ships. For additional details supporting these correlations, see the blog article "The Narrow Pass and Narrow Passage."

    A Book of Mormon Trifecta

    $
    0
    0
    If the Book of Mormon geography problem is solved in this generation as I believe it will be, these three resources will prove pivotal:
    1. The 2009 Yale edition of the text edited by Royal Skousen. Based on the best scholarship currently available, this is as close as we can come to the words that fell from the lips of the prophet as he dictated to his scribes in the moment of translation. The Lord's target language was Early Modern English (A.D. 1470 - 1700+) and the translation process was largely controlled by a higher power. See the blog article "Early Modern English." We can take this text at face value, read with precision and ferret meaning from every word. This is our tool for textual analysis.  
    2. The Oxford English Dictionary. The OED, in process since 1857, is the ultimate authority on English. It can help us grasp the nuanced meanings of words and phrases as they were understood in the time of Shakespeare and the King James Bible. This is  our tool for lexical analysis. The combination of the Yale edition and the OED are still subject to interpretive assumptions. To understand our assumptions, see the blog articles "Plainness" and "Some Questions and a Rule."
    3. Google Earth. World's most widely-used geographic information system can quickly prove or disprove hypotheses. Is point A higher in elevation than point B? Is B east of A? How many air kilometers separate A from B? Where are the mountains? rivers? swamps? dense foliage? How high is the tree canopy? Are known mineral reserves nearby? Does an area exhibit wilderness characteristics? Where are the known archaeological sites in the area? How many square kilometers are in a tract of land? How many people live in the area today? What routes do the modern roads and railroads follow? These and dozens of similar questions can be answered with specialized data sets rendered in Google Earth. Then, as a model begins to come together, Google Earth is an ideal repository because most Book of Mormon students on the planet can access it with minimal effort and expense. This is our tool for spatial analysis.
    Our tool for chronological analysis, admittedly crude, is the timeline published in the 1980 and 2013 LDS editions of the text. We are aware of the excellent work being done by Randall P. Spackman ("The Jewish/Nephite Lunar Calendar" in Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 7/1, 1998) but have not yet incorporated it into our research methodology. Our tools for cultural analysis include such important works as John L. Sorenson's Mormon's Codex: An Ancient American Book (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book and the Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship, 2013).

    The 2009 Yale edition hardbound costs $30 - $40 and a Kindle edition is available. The OED online edition costs $295 per year for an individual subscription in the US and Canada. Many libraries and academic institutions subscribe. Google Earth is free to download on Linux, Windows and Mac. The Google Earth Pro edition costs $399 per year for a single user license. The free version has 95% of the functionality in the paid version and will be adequate for almost all students of the Nephite text.

    Using all three resources extensively, we have analyzed a key feature in Nephite, Lamanite and Jaredite geography, the narrow (small) neck of land, from a variety of perspectives. A precis of this analysis illustrates the way the Book of Mormon trifecta can facilitate clear, definitive correlations based on data-driven, reproducible results. 
    • Since many people correlate the Isthmus of Tehuantepec with the narrow (small) neck, we used Google Earth and Microsoft Excel to list 53 well-known isthmuses in ascending order by width. Tehuantepec, at 216 km, is the widest isthmus in our sample set and may be the widest on earth. It is 10X the width of the mean and 73X the width of the median of our sample. As isthmuses go, Tehuantepec is huge, even gigantic. Its surface area (as defined by geographers) is 57,629 square kilometers which is nearly 3X the size of the modern nation of Israel. Correlating it with the diminutive language in the text (narrow, small) is ludicrous. See the blog article "Isthmuses."
    • Reading the text closely, we identified 17 occurrences of the word "narrow," 10 occurrences of the allied word "strait," and 50 occurrences of the word "small." Analyzing all passages containing these 77 occurrences, we deduced a reasonable upper limit for the width of the things being described. This included a preliminary look at 15 land forms in 6 different countries with the word "neck" in their name. Our results from this textual and spatial analysis: to be either "narrow" or "small" in Book of Mormon parlance a geographic feature will probably not exceed 5 km in width with 20 km the extreme upper limit of plausibility. See the blog article "Narrow and Small Things."
    • We then analyzed all occurrences of the word "neck" in the text and discovered an interesting passage (2 Nephi 18:8) where this word is used in a geographic context. Exegesis on this passage led us to conclude the Isaiah neck would not have exceeded 5 km in width and was probably closer to 2 km. See the blog article "Another Geographic Neck."
    • Immersing ourselves in the text, we identified 15 criteria any candidate narrow (small) neck must satisfy. Key findings: a) Orientation is generally southward to northward, b) The neck fronts one and only one sea - the west sea. c) The neck is near the east-west Bountiful/Desolation line that rises in the east and terminates at the west sea. d) The east-west line is situated in a place where the topography aids defense and can help a standing army control hostile southward-northward movement. e) The east-west line is on the order of 22.5 km in length according to our derivation of the standard Nephite unit of distance measure documented in the blog article "Land Southward Travel Times," f) The neck is near a harbor suitable for berthing and launching ocean-going vessels. g) The neck is near an important Olmec (Jaredite) archaeological site. h) The neck is near an inlet of the ocean or an outlet (mouth) where an inland saltwater lagoon breaches the coastal sandbar. i) Southward from the narrow neck is terrain suitable for a game preserve. j) The width of the neck does not exceed 5 - 20 km. Using Google Earth we then showed how our candidate for the narrow (small) neck, the Barra San Marcos running along the Pacific coast of Chiapas, fits all 15 criteria comfortably. See the blog article "The Narrow (Small) Neck of Land."
    • Further close reading of the text led us to the conclusion that other significant Book of Mormon geographic features lay in close proximity to the neck.. These include a) the narrow pass, b) the narrow passage, and c) the east-west defensive line described in Helaman 4:7. We identified 16 textual criteria the narrow pass must satisfy, non enumerated criteria the narrow passage must satisfy, and 3 criteria the fortified line must satisfy. Using Google Earth we then showed how our candidates for these 3 geographic features fit all criteria clearly and precisely. See the blog article "The Narrow Pass and Narrow Passage." With this analysis complete, we had identified an ecosystem of 16 geographic features from the text, all in the immediate vicinity of the narrow (small) neck of land. There were enough intersecting and mutually reinforcing lines of reasoning supporting our correlations we felt comfortable in April, 2013 claiming a 90% confidence level in this portion of our map. See the blog article "Plainness." That confidence level has since risen as we have pursued additional lines of inquiry.
    • After a visit to Sant-Malo, France, we were convinced our analysis in blog article "The Narrow Pass and Narrow Passage" point 12 was solid (pun intended.) The use of granite as a defensive architectural building material affords a logical explanation for the otherwise enigmatic passage in Mormon 4:4. See the blog article "French Connection" point 6.   
    • As soon as a second witness (Stanford Carmack) corroborated Royal Skousen's conclusions about Elizabethan, Jacobean and Caroline English and tight control over the translation process (see the blog article "Early Modern English") we felt impressed to focus attention on the 1500's and 1600's. Using Google Earth, Microsoft Excel and a few historical records, we came up with an alphabetized list of 115 necks of land from the English colonial era whose names persist on modern maps. We ventured into Australia and New Zealand for a few examples actually called "narrow neck." This was a major expansion and refinement of the research we published in November, 2012 under the title "Narrow and Small Things." How many necks of land are there along the eastern seaboard of North America? Hundreds. Our sample set of 115 is comprehensive but by no means exhaustive. Important things we learned about necks of land named in the Early Modern English era: a) They averaged 2.0 kilometers in width. Barra San Marcos is 2.0 km wide. b) They were almost all (98%) peninsulas rather than isthmuses. Barra San Marcos is a peninsula. c) Most of them (87%) fronted salt water and/or estuaries. Barra San Marcos fronts estuarial waters on one side and open ocean on the other. We illustrated 8 example necks from our sample set of long, slender coastal sandbars similar to Barra San Marcos. See the blog article "Necks of Land."
    • Having some experience with languages other than English, we were curious how LDS translators had rendered Alma 22:32, Alma 63:5 and Ether 10:20 in various romance languages. This is important because the way a language commonly describes a particular land form tells us salient things about the land form itself. We found 6 "tongues" of land, 5 "strips" and 1 "isthmus." See the blog article "Romance Languages." These expressions lend support to our notion of a slender, peninsular land form.
    • Finally, we immersed ourselves in the OED to understand Early Modern English senses of words and phrases such as "narrow,""small neck," and "led into." See the blog article "OED on Necks of Land." Some key findings: a) Something "narrow" has a length considerably larger than its width or breadth. This corroborates Barra San Marcos, but disqualifies the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. b) In 1676, Englishmen along the coast of Tabasco used the term "small neck of land" to describe the long, slender sandbar Barra del Panteon which fronts the open ocean on one side and a network of saltwater lagoons on the other. The correspondences with Barra San Marcos, 270 air kilometers distant, could hardly be more striking. c) The Early Modern English sense of the word "between" came from "by twin" meaning an independent entity C adjunct to but not integral with A and B, both of whom share significant commonalities. From this we conclude the narrow (small) neck of land was not a seamless continuation of either the land southward or the land northward, but another kind of land form entirely, aligned with the other two. In this sense, Barra San Marcos fits perfectly while the Isthmus of Tehuantepec fails utterly. d) The sense of the phrase "led into" which occurs 4 times in the text associated with 3 different geographic features is a distinctive, independent entity in communication with another entity like a gate to a garden or a path to a forest. Again, Barra San Marcos fits this sense of meaning in contrast with the Isthmus of Tehuantepec which clearly does not. Furthermore, the directionality of the narrow neck, pass and passage specified in the text is a striking corroboration of our correlation.
    With the convergence of all these streams of evidence, we are now 98% confident our correlation of the narrow (small) neck of land with Barra San Marcos along the Pacific coast of Chiapas is correct. Ric Hauck and Joe Andersen have been trying to get us to pay attention to this area around Tonala, Chiapas since at least the 1980's (See F. Richard Hauck, Deciphering the Geography of the Book of Mormon, Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1988. 98% is as far as we are willing to go right now because archaeological excavation will always have the last word. We are also 98% confident that the Usumacinta is river Sidon, the Caribbean is sea east, and the Pacific is sea west.

    We believe this methodology - mining the Yale edition, OED and Google Earth for meaning - will eventually result in a working consensus on Book of Mormon New World geographic correlations through the same proven iterative process of reproducible results that drives science generally. Most of the historical disagreements among LDS Mesoamericanists stem from these four questions:
    1. What does the text say and what does it not say? The Yale edition solves this problem. It provides a de facto standard for scholarly inquiry.
    2. What do the words in the text mean? Now that we know we are dealing with Early Modern English, careful reading in the OED pretty much solves this problem.
    3. Does a particular geographic feature fit the text? With appropriate data sets, Google Earth can tell us yes or no quite quickly.
    4. Do ancient cultural resources fit the text? This data will remain forever tentative because of the dynamic nature of Mesoamerican scholarship. Significant new archaeological fieldwork will be required to advance the state of this art. 
    The methodology described above will facilitate consensus on questions 1 - 3. Question 4 remains open to interpretation as new discoveries continually enhance our understanding of the ancient cultures in our area of interest.

      OED on Rivers

      $
      0
      0
      Using the Oxford English Dictionary, we will shed some lexical light on the river Sidon and its head, paying particular attention to Early Modern English (see the blog article by that name) senses of meaning. The proper name Sidon occurs 37 times in the text in the following constructs. Scriptural references document first attestation.
      Relative Size
      Naming conventions for flowing water in North America were largely established in the 1600's, the Early Modern English era. In North America the following order of watercourse size is common:
      • A brook has no tributaries. You step over a brook. Many brooks are seasonal. A brook can be called a "very small stream."
      • A creek is formed by the confluence of multiple brooks. You jump over a creek. A creek is often called a "small stream."
      • A stream is formed by the confluence of multiple creeks. You wade across a stream.
      • A river is formed by the confluence of many streams. At the point of confluence where a river is born, these tributaries are called head-streams. A river's largest head-stream is called its main head-stream or main-stem, which may or may not be its largest tributary depending on what enters the channel downstream. At a ford, you may be able to wade across a river at low water, but generally you swim or float across it. Most rivers flow year-round. A river is generally described with augmentative adjectives (large, wide, deep) and seldom in diminutive terms (small, narrow, shallow). The confluence of two (or occasionally three) rivers creates a third (or occasionally fourth) river. 
      • A seaway is a large river with a channel deep enough for ocean-going ship traffic.
      Other regional terms include branch, burn, fork, kill (from the Middle Dutch "kille"), race, run and wash. Bayou, slough and swamp generally describe a marshy area of slow moving water. In Britain the word "creek" denotes a tidal inlet. "Stream" is also a generic term referring to any flow of liquid or gas regardless of size.

      Much of North America was originally surveyed using a 100 link chain 66 feet long. 1/4 chain = 1 rod. 10 chains = 1 furlong. 80 chains = 1 mile. When surveyors cane to a watercourse wider than 1 chain they usually called it a river. Names became politicized due to property rights. In many U.S. states the bottom of a river is public property while a brook, creek or stream may be privately owned. This led to some re-naming to benefit large land owners, particularly timber interests.

      "A gret rywer he gert him pas." John Barbour, Bruce, 1380 printed in 1489.
      "Wheare did run a rever, so bige and stifly...that we durste not adventur to rid over it." Thomas Dallam, Diary, 1599.

      This means the river Sidon is almost certainly a large stream with many upstream tributaries.

      Our correlation for the river Sidon is the Chixoy/Salinas/Usumacinta, the largest river in Mesoamerica. The Chixoy-Negro (average width 140 meters) is its main head-stream. It has a vast network of upstream (and downstream) tributaries.
      Usumacinta River with Tributaries
      Directionality
      Local meanders or great bends notwithstanding, a river in the Early Modern English era generally flowed in one principal direction. A river that veered off in another direction was usually given a new name. For example, at Fairmont, West Virginia the West Fork River and the Tygart Valley (East Fork) River come together to form the Monongahela which flows north for 210 kilometers to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. East of Coudersport in north central, Pennsylvania the Allegheny is formed from the confluence of several streams. After a great bend into southern New York, the Allegheny flows generally south southwest for 523 kilometers to Pittsburgh. The Allegheny (the main head-stream) and the Monongahela come together at Pittsburgh to form the Ohio which flows generally west southwest for 1,579 kilometers before it joins the Mississippi at Cairo, Illinois. The Ohio is the principal tributary of the Mississippi. At Cairo, the Ohio carries almost a third more water than the Mississippi. Since the Mississippi follows its general southerly course, though, its name continues downstream.

      "And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria."Bible King James Version Genesis 2:14.

      This means river Sidon probably flows in a generally consistent direction throughout its length. We know from textual analysis the river Sidon flows generally south to north. See the blog article "River Sidon South to North."

      Our correlation for the river Sidon, the Chixoy/Salinas/Usumacinta begins at the point where the east-flowing Chixoy-Negro turns north. From this point, the Usumacinta system flows generally 28 degrees west of north.
      Usumacinta River System Flowing South to North
      Head of a River
      In the Early Modern English era, the head of a river was the point of confluence where streams came together with enough water flow to form a river, or the point of confluence where two rivers came together and formed a third. This head of a river is a very different thing than the modern concept of headwaters (aka ultimate headwaters) or the most distant source of a river. Geographers and explorers compete to locate the ultimate sources of major rivers using modern technology, while the heads of those rivers have generally been well-known for centuries. The head of the Amazon is the confluence of the Marañon with the Ucayali about 130 river kilometers upstream from Iquitos, Peru. The headwaters of the Amazon (not established until 1996) lie more than 3,000 river kilometers upstream in the melting glaciers of Nevado Mismi in Arequipa Province, Peru.   The head of the Ohio is Point State Park in Pittsburgh. The headwaters of the Ohio are nearly 600 river kilometers upstream in Potter County, Pennsylvania. The head of the Mississippi is Lake Itasca in Clearwater County, Minnesota. The headwaters of the Mississippi are over 1,200 air kilometers away where the most distant source of the Missouri (Hell Roaring Creek) begins at Brower's Spring southwest of West Yellowstone, Montana. Basically, the head of a river is the point at which the name begins while the headwaters are the origin of the longest stream channel from source to mouth.

      "As the River leadeth thee to his head; shall not the head lead thee to the originall spring thereof?" Philippe de Mornay translated by Sir Philip Sidney and Arthur Golding, A woorke concerning the trewnesse of the christian religion, (London: John Charlewood and George Robinson for Thomas Cadman, 1587)

      This means the head of the river Sidon is almost certainly the confluence of upstream watercourses and not headwaters.

      Our correlation for the head of the river Sidon (following V. Garth Norman) is the confluence of the northwest-flowing Salama with the east-flowing Chixoy-Negro. This is the same point geographers identify as the head of the Chixoy.
      Head of the Chixoy
      A river can also spawn downstream distributaries, each with a head. This is the sense of Genesis 2:10.

      Word Order
      The Book of Mormon always refers to "river Sidon" rather than "Sidon River." This is consistent  with Early Modern English and modern British usage.

      "Beyond the riuer Ganges...the people are caught with the Sun, and begin to be blackish." Pliny translated by Philemon Holland, The historie of the world, (London: A. Islip, 1601)
      "Rowed up the River Mississippi, in a Canot."Philosophical transactions, (London: Royal Society of London) Vol. 15, 1685

      This is another of the many indications that the Lord's target language for the 1830 Book of Mormon text was Early Modern English rather than Jacksonian American English.

      Waters
      The Book of Mormon uses the phrase "waters of Sidon" eight times. This construct is attested in Early Modern English.

      "Passaw, Lyntz, and other places adjoining to the waters of Enus and Danubius." Thomas Cranmer, Letter 20 Oct., 1532
      "The extent thereof...and the waters of Medway, all which extent is under the jurisdiction and conservancy of the Lord Mayor..." James Howell, Londinopolis, 1657

        OED on Waters

        $
        0
        0
        This article explores the Book of Mormon text and the Oxford English Dictionary to shed light on the phrases "waters of Sidon,""waters of Sebus,""waters of Mormon,""waters of Ripliancum," etc. The text is unambiguous on Sidon - it is a large river Alma 2:34 that empties into the ocean Alma 3:3. Are the waters of Mormon also a river? Comparing Alma 4:4 with Alma 5:3 it is clear Alma2 was consciously mirroring his father's actions of the previous generation.

        These unique phrases [meaning in brackets] occur in the text listed in order of first attestation.
        These passages show the pervasive Book of Mormon characteristic of duality. Waters are either associated with life, peace, righteousness and deliverance or they connote death, peril, sin and captivity. All of these ideas are found commingled in the single verse 1 Nephi 4:2.

        All unambiguous passages refer to either a) a salt water ocean b) a flowing stream or c) symbolic spirituality, life and healing. The OED confirms that during the Early Modern English era (see the blog article "Early Modern English") "waters" plural referred either to a) water moving in waves [the ocean], b) flowing water [rivers] or c) healing water from medicinal, thermal or therapeutic springs. In this case, the OED strikingly corroborates what we find in the text.

        "Thy waye was in the see, and thy pathes in the great waters." Coverdale Bible, 1535. cf. Psalms 77:19 and Isaiah 43:16.

        "the Waters of the Danube swelled so high as to break down the Bridge which the Enemy had made." Johann Peter Von Valcaren, A relation or diary of the siege of Vienna, 1684.

        "Of whote bathes. Some waters that are generated and flowe out of vaynes of brymstone, are sensybly warme, and some very whott...These waters also being drying by nature, are wholsome for many infyrmities." William Fulke, A goodly gallerye with a most plesaunt prospect, 1563.

        So, evidence from the text and the OED suggests the waters of Mormon, Sebus and Ripliancum are all streams or rivers as in Joshua 3:13. Fountains are generally considered springs as in Deuteronomy 8:7. The fountain mentioned in Mosiah 18:5 is almost certainly a spring feeding a flowing stream. Trees grow along stream beds as in Numbers 24:6 which explains the thicket near the water in Mosiah 18:5. The fountain/tree connection was part of the Nephite worldview 1 Nephi 11:25. The image of waters that flow and gush associated with the actions of a prophet is attested in the text 1 Nephi 20:21 citing Isaiah 48:21. River Jordan was the quintessential baptistery in the New Testament Matthew 3:6, Mark 1:5. The most noted baptistery in the Book of Mormon is probably a flowing stream as well. In the land of Zarahemla, Almaprobably baptized in the river Sidon as his son did decades later Alma 4:4. Alma1's baptisms in Zarahemla were expressly "after the manner" of his iconic baptisms earlier in the waters of Mormon Mosiah 25:18.

        Most LDS Mesoamericanists who deal with the Book of Mormon correlate the waters of Ripliancum with the extensive wetlands at the mouth of the Papaloapan River in Veracruz. Our analysis confirms this correlation as highly likely. In the image below, the Usumacinta system is in red, the Grijalva (with all of its distributaries from Book of Mormon times to the present) is in blue, and all other rivers are in yellow.
        Papaloapan Drainage Basin in Mexico
        The Papaloapan creates the second largest wetlands in Mexico, eclipsed only by the Usumacinta in Tabasco. Driving along Mexican Highway 180 from Veracruz through Alvarado and on to San Andres Tuxtla you pass 30 kilometers of open inland water and many more kilometers of marshlands and small lagoons. The description "large, or to exceed all"Ether 15:8 seems apt in this unusually well-watered area. This is a photo of the mouth of the Papaloapan taken in September, 2006. The river extends almost to the horizon in every direction.
        Mouth of the  Papaloapan. Photo by Kirk Magleby, September, 2006
        Mosiah 8:8 describes Ramah-Cumorah as a "land among many waters." Most LDS Mesoamericanists who include the Book of Mormon in their professional work correlate Ramah-Cumorah with the Tuxtla Mountains in southern Veracruz. Our analysis supports this correlation. This Google Earth image shows the Tuxtla Mountain region with watercourses. The yellow paths are rivers we have visually plotted in Google Earth (a very time consuming process). The black paths are calculated riverbeds derived from NASA satellite imagery elevation data.
        Stream Flows in and around the Tuxtla Mountains
        This area includes rivers tributary to both the Coatzacoalcos to the southeast and the Papaloapan to the northwest. At least 13 other sizable streams flow to the Gulf of Mexico from the slopes of the Tuxtla Mountains. Lake Catemaco is a prominent and beautiful water feature in this area, but the Nephite historians almost certainly had the many rivers in mind when they engraved the words that became the English "land among many waters." As we saw earlier with the general term "waters," the OED sense of meaning for the phrase "many waters" in the Early Modern English era was either flowing water or the ocean.

        "It sounded...as it hadde bene the flushynge noyse of many waters." John Bale, The image of bothe churches, 1548 (estimated date)

        "...the Lord, that is on high, is more of might by far than noise of many waters is, or great sea-billows are."Scotch Psalms, 1650 cf. Psalms 93:4.

        "As the voyce off many waters, and as the voyce off stronge thondrynges." Tyndale Bible, 1526
          
        We know the "waters of Sidon" refers to a large river. The "waters of Ripliancum" probably refers to a large river. The "many waters" in land Ramah-Cumorah probably refer to multiple rivers. This makes it likely the "waters of Mormon" refers to a flowing stream of water since as Royal Skousen frequently reminds us, the original text is very consistent in its usage patterns (See the Editor's Preface to the Yale Edition, page xxxix). In the 1981 LDS edition, Mosiah 18:8 reads "here are the waters of Mormon" which in modern English could potentially refer to any body of water. The Yale edition restores this phrase to its original "here is the waters of Mormon" which in Early Modern English implied a flowing stream.

          Between Things

          $
          0
          0
          The Yale edition of the Book of Mormon text uses the word "between" 33 times in a meticulously consistent way. Entity A is between entities B and C when B & C are analogous but A is apart and dissimilar. This is precisely what we would expect from the OED etymology of the word "between" (by twin or by twain) and its examples of word usage from Early Modern English.

          "A peace made betwene the Emperorure and the Kinge." Charles Wriothesley, A chronicle of England during the reigns of the Tudors, ca. 1600. The emperor and the king are of the same genre, while peace is something else entirely.

          "Which beddes are deuises made of Cotten wooll, and hunge vp betweene two trees..." Archbishop George Abbott, A briefe description of the whole worlde, 1599. The trees are twins. The hammock is distinct.

          "The place where his tent was at ye first, betwene Bethel and Ay." Coverdale Bible, 1535. The two toponyms are analogues. Abraham's tent is different.

          This same pattern of outlier A by correlates B & C holds throughout the text. The following verses document all unique instances of the word "between" in order of first attestation.
          Enos 1:24 wars between the Nephites and the Lamanites
          Omni 1:10 much war and contention between my people the Nephites and the Lamanites
          Omni 1:24 a serious war and much bloodshed between the Nephites and the Lamanites
          Mosiah 21:22 disturbance between the Lamanites and the people of Limhi
          Alma heading: a war between the Nephites and the Lamanites
          Alma 1:15 there [up on the top of Hill Manti] he [Nehor] was caused or rather did acknowledge between the heavens and the earth
          Alma 22:32 the line between the land Bountiful and the land Desolation (Only in the Yale Edition, not in the 1981 or 2013 LDS editions. A line is a political or ecological boundary while lands are contiguous territories.)
          Alma 22:32 a small neck of land between the land northward and the land southward (the small neck of land was a substantively different land form separate from either the land northward or the land southward)
          Alma 27:23 we will set our armies between the land Jershon and the land Nephi
          Alma 40:9 a space between the time of death and the resurrection
          Alma 40:11 the state of the soul between death and the resurrection
          Alma 40:21 a space between death and the resurrection
          Alma 50:11 the line between the Nephites and the Lamanites
          Alma 50:11 [the line] between the land of Zarahemla and the land of Nephi
          Alma 50:14 a foundation for a city between the city of Moroni and the city of Aaron (a foundation for a city is of a different nature than established cities)
          Alma 50:26 a warm contention between them [the land of Morianton and the land of Lehi
          Alma 50:35 a battle commenced between them [Teancum's forces and the people of Morianton]
          Alma 50:36 a union took place between them [the people of Morianton] and the people of Lehi
          Alma 51:1 peace between the people of Lehi and the people of Morianton
          Alma 52:20 plains between the two cities [the city of Bountiful and the city of Mulek]
          Alma 62:35 this great and lasting war between them [the Nephites] and the Lamanites
          Alma 62:41 the war between the Nephites and the Lamanites
          Helaman 2:1 peace between the Nephites and the Lamanites
          3 Nephi 2:17 war between the robbers and the people of Nephi
          3 Nephi 3:23 the land which was between the land of (the word "of" is not in the LDS 1981 & 2013 editions of the text) Zarahemla and the land Bountiful. (There are 3 major ways this curious "land between" was different from the land of Zarahemla, the land Bountiful, or any other traditional Nephite land. 1) It had no name, only a description. 2) It was a narrow defensive military corridor and refugee camp 3 Nephi 3:22. 3) It was abandoned after the war ended and it had served its temporary purpose 3 Nephi 6:1,2.)
          3 Nephi 24:18 Then shall ye return and discern between the righteous and the wicked (citing Malachi 3:18)
          3 Nephi 23:18 [ye shall discern] between him that serveth God and him that serveth him not
          Mormon 1:8 war between the Nephites [and the Lamanites]
          Mormon 1:8 this was was between the Nephites and the Lamanites
          Mormon 2:1 war again between the Nephites and the Lamanites
          Ether 9:12 war between the sons of Akish and Akish
          The text is scrupulously consistent in its usage of the word "between." In every case, entity A is adjacent to but substantively different from twin, correlate or parallel entities B & C. This pattern has a profound implication for Book of Mormon geography. It means the Isthmus of Tehuantepec (or any other wide isthmus) cannot be the small neck of land described in Alma 22:32. The Isthmus of Tehuantepec is an unbroken continuum of land mass including continental divide and rivers flowing toward both oceans. Tehuantepec as the small neck, integral with both the land northward and the land southward, overtly contradicts the textual pattern.

          Part of the boundary between the land northward and the land southward may still pass through the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. Virtually all LDS Mesoamericanists who treat the Book of Mormon believe the Coatzacoalcos River was an important boundary on the Gulf of Campeche. Limhi's exploring party could still have traveled through the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. The text never says those 43 intrepid men passed through the narrow (small) neck of land. It only says they made it from the land of Nephi to the land of Cumorah and back again. Conjecture on the part of many that the narrow (small) neck of land is an isthmus and therefore all land movement between the lands northward and southward must have passed through it is not supported in the text. The narrow (small) neck of land is a coastal feature Ether 10:20 associated with one and only one sea, the west sea Alma 22:32, Alma 63:5 which means it is a narrow peninsula.

          Our correlate for the small neck of land could hardly fit the text and its Early Modern English sense of meaning more precisely. Barra San Marcos is a long, slender peninsula separated from the mainland by a series of coastal lagoons.
          Barra San Marcos & Environs near Tonala, Chiapas
          The text uses the similar word "betwixt" 6 times, sometimes as a synonym for "between" and other times with unique meanings. As we saw with "between," this is precisely what we would expect from the OED senses of meaning for "betwixt."

          New Day for the Book of Mormon

          $
          0
          0
          In between general conference sessions on Sunday, October 5, 2014 the Church broadcast perhaps the finest documentary ever made about the Book of Mormon. Written and directed by Russ Holt (How Rare a Possession: The Book of Mormon [the Vincenzo Di Francesca story], 1987; Special Witnesses of Christ, 2000; The Work and the Glory, 2004) and filmed by T.C. Christensen (Trail of Hope: The Story of the Mormon Trail, 1997; American Prophet: The Story of Joseph Smith, 1999; The Testaments: Of One Fold and One Shepherd, 2000; The Work and the Glory, 2004; Joseph Smith: Prophet of the Restoration, 2005; Emma Smith, My Story 2008; Forever Strong [the story of Larry Gelwix and the Highland High School Rugby Team], 2008; Gordon B. Hinckley: A Giant among Men, 2008; That Promised Day: The Coming Forth of the LDS Scriptures, 2010; 17 Miracles, 2011, Ephraim's Rescue, 2013), the work entitled "New Day for the Book of Mormon" documents the coming forth of the book, its impact around the world, and its increasingly favorable reception in the scholarly community. One comes away from this high quality production with the sense the Book of Mormon's star is definitely rising. You can watch it on BYU TV here.

          The piece begins with the quote: "All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them." Galileo Galilei (1564 - 1642). It ends with the quote: "Of all American religious books of the nineteenth century, it seems probable that the Book of Mormon was the most powerful. It reached only a small percentage of the people, but it affected this small percentage so powerfully and lastingly that all the people of the United States have been affected, especially by its contribution to opening up one of our great frontiers." Henry A. Wallace, Vice President of the United States, 1941 - 1945. In between it interlaces segments from 13 different interviews listed in order of first appearance in the film.
          1. Candid interviews on the streets of New York. This is the same way the Church's first movie in theatrical release, "Meet the Mormons," opens.
          2. Paul C. Gutjahr, Evangelical, Professor of English, American Studies and Religious Studies at Indiana University. Gutjahr is the author of The "Book of Mormon": A Biography published in 2012 by Princeton University Press in their Lives of Great Religious Books series.
          3. Stephen H. Webb, Catholic theologian. The blog article "Mormon Christianity" has notes from a lecture Webb gave at BYU in May, 2014.
          4. Amy Easton-Flake, LDS, Assistant Professor of Ancient Scripture at BYU.
          5. Lynn Ridenhour, Baptist minister from Missouri.
          6. Terryl L. Givens, LDS, Professor of Literature and Religion at the University of Richmond. Givens'By the Hand of Mormon: The American Scripture that Launched a New World Religion (New York City: Oxford University Press, 2002) was a milestone, a first-rate sympathetic treatment of the Book of Mormon published by a major academic press.
          7. Elder Jeffrey R. Holland, LDS, member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles.
          8. John W. Welch, LDS, founder of FARMS and Professor of Law, BYU. The people in our dispensation who have done the most to help us understand the Book of Mormon are 1) Joseph Smith Jr. who taught us to revere the text as an inspired document, 2) Hugh W. Nibley who taught us to read the text as an ancient document, 3) John W. [Jack] Welch who taught us to read the text as a Hebrew document, 4) John L. Sorenson who taught us to read the text as a Mesoamerican document, and 5) Royal Skousen who taught us to read the text as an Early Modern English translation document. Welch taught us that every word is important. Skousen taught us that every letter is important.
          9. Michael H. Mackay, LDS, historian with the Church History Department.
          10. Catherine M. Stokes, LDS, former Deputy Director of the Illinois Department of Health.
          11. Katty P. Dowdle, LDS, entrepreneur.
          12. Richard D. Rust, LDS, former Professor of Literature at the University of North Carolina.
          13. Orson Scott Card, LDS, novelist.
          Voice over historical re-enactments share words from Joseph Smith and Lucy Mack Smith. Givens in one of his interview segments refers to prominent LDS historian Richard L. Bushman and the interaction the two of them have had with Ann Taves, Professor of Religious Studies at UC Santa Barbara.
            Striking visuals in the production include title pages from:
            • 1830 edition
            • Grant Hardy, editor, The Book of Mormon: A Reader's Edition (Urbana, Chicago and Springfield: University of Illinois Press, 2003) [1920 LDS edition]
            • Joseph Smith, Jr., translator, The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ (New York, etc.: Doubleday, 2004) [1981 LDS edition]
            • Joseph Smith, Jr., translator, The Book of Mormon (New York: Penguin Classics, 2008) [1840 Nauvoo edition]
            • Royal Skousen, editor, The Book of Mormon: The Earliest Text (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2009)
            The film presents 2 evidences for the authenticity of the text. John W. Welch recounts the well-known story of his discovery of chiasmus in the Book of Mormon on Wednesday, August 16, 1967 in Regensburg, Germany where he was serving as a missionary in the South German Mission under President Orville C. Gunther. This is not Welch's strongest retelling of the gripping account (on other occasions he has said the voice told him, "if it is evidence of Hebrew influence in the Gospel of Matthew, it is evidence of Hebrew influence in the Book of Mormon"), but it is effective and the background visuals are excellent. Chiasmus remains the strongest internal evidence we have from the text of its ancient origin. Welch explains that the literary form shows Hebraic circularity in thought processes as opposed to the more familiar Greek - Western linearity. Terryl L. Givens talks about the two stone altars at Naham in modern Yemen dating from ca. 600 B.C. that bear the inscription "to the people of Naham (or Nahum, Nahom, Nahem, Nehem. Ancient Semitic inscriptions lack vowels.) This is a Google Earth image of modern Naham showing the ridge line of Mount Naham towering to the north west. The Yemeni capital, Sana'a, is 52 air kilometers to the southwest.
            Naham in modern Yemen
            The blog article "Water Fight on the River - Round Ten" shows a photograph of one of the Naham altars. It was Ross T. Christensen who first called our attention to this place in the August, 1978 Ensign comment "The Place Called Nahom." Christensen noticed the name on a 1763 Danish map. This is a clear and convincing example of a Book of Mormon place name successfully correlated with the modern map, corroborated by appropriately dated archaeological remains found in situ. The ancient Arabic term NHM connotes death or mourning as in 1 Nephi 16:34-35.

            Some memorable lines (paraphrased) from the lavishly illustrated film:
            • Since 1830 the Book of Mormon has been maligned, scrutinized and revered by millions.
            • Its very existence is more of a miracle than most people will ever realize (Welch).
            • The book in infused with undeniable physicality and radical supernaturalism (Givens).
            • Almost all of the text we have today was translated (dictated) in approximately 65 working days between April 7, 1829 and the end of June, 1829 (Welch).
            • 20% of the original manuscript is extant (Welch). This is an error. Jack meant to say 28%. See Royal Skousen's preface to the Yale edition, page xxix.
            • The Book of Mormon from the beginning has appealed to both the spiritual and the intellectual faculties of the believers (Givens).
            • The book was first offered for public sale in Palmyra, NY on March 26, 1830. 
            • The first missionary in this dispensation, Samuel H. Smith, gave a copy of the book to Phineas  H. Young in Mendon, NY about 23 kilometers from Palmyra, who in turn gave it to his younger brother, Brigham.
            • There is more Jesus Christ in the Book of Mormon than there is in the Bible (Webb).
            • Joseph Smith was a literary genius and also a theological genius (Webb).
            • The Book of Mormon is an inexhaustible well of meaning (Rust)
            • I have read the Book of Mormon through many times, to create timelines and a geography, to identify themes and cultural characteristics (Card).
            • When you make it on the Penguin list, it says you are a major American author. It credentials the text (Gutjahr).
            • I didn't get past the first page of 1 Nephi before I was as we say here in Missouri, sideswiped by God. I feel like I have been born again, again (Ridenhour).
            • The Book of Mormon is more Baptist than the Baptist Hymnal (Ridenhour).
            • There is no room in the narrative for allegorical or figurative meaning (Givens).
            • The authors of the Book of Mormon wanted us to be better people, happier people (Card).
            • The Book of Mormon has been subjected to a withering examination and it still stands. It will be a witness for Christ until he comes (Holland).
            Highly recommended. As they say in the movie business, five stars and two thumbs up.

                A Nephite

                $
                0
                0
                This article will examine all 7 occurrences of the phrase "a Nephite" in the text in an attempt to clarify the sense of meaning that term held for the authors of the Book of Mormon.

                Alma 8:20 "And the man [Amulek] saith (1981 & 2013 LDS editions read 'said') unto him [Alma2]: I am a Nephite." This was Amulek's declaration of political and religious affiliation. Amulek lived in Ammonihah which was the headquarters of the Nehorite/Amlicite apostasy. Five years prior to Alma's visit a major schism resulted in many former Nephites becoming political and religious Amlicites Alma 2:11. Amulek affirmed that he did not vote for Amlici in the ca. 87 B.C. plebiscite Alma 2:5-7.

                Alma 19:18"And they also saw Ammon - and behold, he was a Nephite." Lamanites in the court of King Lamoni could distinguish a foreigner in their midst. Ethnically and culturally a person of Nephite descent stood out when surrounded by Lamanites.

                Alma 22:32"And now it was only the distance of a day and a half's journey for a Nephite on the line between the land (the 1981 & 2013 LDS editions omit 'between the land') Bountiful and the land Desolation, from the east to the west sea;" Was a day and a half's journey for a Nephite an exceptional or heroic distance? No. It was neither inordinate nor impressive. The sense of the diminutive word "only" means something on a modest, pedestrian scale. "A Nephite" means a citizen of the Nephite polity. This verse tells us the Nephites had a standard unit of distance measure (1 day's journey) just as they had standard units for weight or volume (measure of barley) Alma 11:7 and value (shum, seon, etc.) Alma 11:9. The heading to 1 Nephi, Mosiah 23:3, Alma 8:6 and Helaman 4:7 all attest to this standard unit of distance measure in use among the Nephites.

                Alma 49:25 "their king Amalickiah, who was a Nephite by birth," A person born to Nephite parents was considered a Nephite in the ethnic sense of that word even after they had renounced their Nephite citizenship, moved abroad and become politically active in their new homeland.

                Alma 55:32 "if their wine would poison a Lamanite, it would also poison a Nephite." Here "a Nephite" is a broad term referring to any member of the Nephite nation or soldier in the Nephite army.

                Helaman 4:7"it being a day's journey for a Nephite on the line which they had fortified." Ca. 90 B.C. the Nephites stationed a military garrison on the Bountiful side of an east-west line separating the land Bountiful on the south from the land Desolation on the north. This line, terminating in the west sea, was 1.5 day's journey long Alma 22:32-33. The line described in Alma 22 is not the same as the line described here in Helaman 4 which was established ca. 35 B.C. Both lines ran from a point in the east to the west sea, but the Helaman 4:7 line was shorter by one-third and it was south of the longer line. How do we know this? Helaman 4:6 says the shorter line was entirely contained within the land Bountiful which along the Nephite west coast was south of the Bountiful/Desolation border. As we have seen above, "a Nephite" refers to any Nephite national whether citizen or soldier.

                Helaman 5:35"one among them who was a Nephite by birth." This Nephite dissenter was born to Nephite parents. He was an ethnic Nephite who had become a Lamanite in his political and religious affiliations and now resided among the Lamanites.

                These verses present a clear and consistent picture. "A Nephite" was any member of the Nephite polity, a common man, an ordinary foot soldier. The hunt for elite Nephite equivalents of ultra marathoners, Olympic gold medalist distance runners or kayak racers who could have traversed the wide (216 kilometer) Isthmus of Tehuantepec in a day and a half (following Alma 22:32) or a day (following Helaman 4:7) is unwarranted and atextual.

                OED on Narrow

                $
                0
                0
                To better understand Alma 22:32, Alma 63:5 and Ether 10:20 we looked at all textual occurrences of the words "narrow,""strait" and "small" in the Book of Mormon to get a sense of the Nephite meaning of those terms. We concluded any geographic feature exceeding 20 kilometers in width is completely out of the question - the Nephites would not have called it "narrow" or "small," with 5 kilometers a much more likely upper limit. See the blog article "Narrow and Small Things."

                The language that fell from the Prophet Joseph's lips in the moment of translation was Early Modern English as we saw in the blog article "Early Modern English." This makes it important for us to understand the sense of meaning the word "narrow" carried in the A.D. 1470 - A.D. 1700 Early Modern English era. We will examine the Oxford English Dictionary to see how the term "narrow" was used in a geographic context in Early Modern English. The word "narrow" appears over 4,000 times in the OED, so we have abundant data to work with.

                The general sense of meaning for "narrow" is something slender or constricted, whose breadth or width is small in proportion to its length. An urban street with houses on either side is narrow. A tree-lined country lane is narrow. A brook or rivulet is narrow.

                "Hee did shut them [Irish rebels] up within those narrow corners and glynnes [glens] under the mountaines foote." Edmund Spenser, A Veue of the Present State of Ireland, 1596. Reading Spenser in context it is clear the mountains he refers to are Mourne Mountains rising to elevations in excess of 600 meters in Newry and Mourne Council, Northern Ireland. This is a Google Earth image of one of the narrow glens at the foot of Mourne Mountains. This glen is 1.41 kilometers wide at the point indicated.
                Narrow Glen at the foot of Mourne Mountains, Northern Ireland
                "The small narrow streight of Menai." William Camden (Philemon Holland, translator) Britain; or A chorographicall description of England, Scotland and Ireland (London: G. Bishop and I Norton, 1610). Menai Strait is a stretch of tidal water separating the Isle of Anglesey from the Welsh mainland. It is .77 kilometers wide near Bangor.
                Menai Strait in Northwest Wales
                "The haven of Messina is...compassed almost round with the city on one side, and a narrow languet or neck of land on the other." John Ray, Observations topographical, moral, and physiological..., 1673. The word "languet" derives from the Middle French word "languete" meaning "tongue." We saw in an earlier post that other Romance languages use the phrase "tongue of land" as their equivalent of the English "neck of land." See the blog article "Romance Languages." We see here that John Ray considered "tongue" and "neck" of land synonymous in English as well. This is the Sicilian land form described as a narrow neck of land in Early Modern English. The curved peninsula is .40 kilometers wide at its base.
                Narrow Tongue or Neck of Land, Messina, Italy
                "Wawne [Walney] Iseland wch is a narrow screed of land lying before Fourness..." Henry Slingsby, The diary of Sir Henry Slingsby of Scriven Bart, 1644. Walney Island is .65 kilometers wide at the point indicated and 1.29 kilometers wide at the triangular-shaped airport on its northern end.
                Walney Island, Cumbria, England




                   

                Test #7 Land Areas

                $
                0
                0
                Based on textual criteria and Mesoamerican topography, we have created a preliminary map for 31 local lands mentioned by name or description in the Book of Mormon. The text describes most of them as classic city states Alma 43:25 with a principal city and the lands round about Mosiah 7:21. The city state land use pattern is well-known worldwide and forms the basis for local and regional administrative entities in many countries. Test #7 compares the sizes of our proposed Book of Mormon lands with known geographic entities that could reasonably be considered analogues for Nephite and Lamanite local lands. Continental-scale lands in the text such as Bountiful, Desolation, Greater Zarahemla and Greater Nephi are purposely excluded from this analysis because their extent clearly exceeded that of a typical city state. This test is admittedly crude in some ways, but it does indicate whether or not our correlations are in the ballpark of reasonableness based on known ways humans have grouped themselves in local and regional administrative units in a wide variety of geographies and time periods.

                Preliminary sizes of named or described Book of Mormon lands. All areas are in square kilometers.
                1. Ammonihah 842
                2. Antionum 2,390
                3. Antum 1,978
                4. Land between Zarahemla and Bountiful 1,157
                5. Cumorah 2,570
                6. Land of First Inheritance 9,095
                7. Gideon 1,848
                8. Ishmael 834
                9. Jashon 1,282
                10. Jershon 4,307
                11. Jerusalem 3,899
                12. Joshua 710
                13. Lehi 3,107
                14. Manti 2,083
                15. Melek 1,238
                16. Middoni 930
                17. Minon 1,354
                18. Morianton 1,661
                19. Mormon 2,268
                20. Moroni 3,594
                21. Most capital parts of the land 3,115
                22. Land near Bountiful 1,194
                23. Nephi 1,116
                24. Nephihah 3,529
                25. Noah 962
                26. Shem 690
                27. Shemlon 711
                28. Shilom 359
                29. Sidom 617
                30. Siron 2,069
                31. Zarahemla 3,520
                mean: 2,098
                median: 1,661
                min: 359
                max: 9,095
                31 Proposed Lands in the Book of Mormon
                --
                33 Counties in Scotland at the time of the 1951 census
                mean: 2,328
                median: 1,263
                min: 141
                max: 10,907
                33 Counties in Scotland
                --
                32 Counties in Ireland
                mean: 2,629
                median: 2,050
                min: 826
                max: 7,500
                32 Counties in Ireland
                --
                40 Historic Counties in England at the time of the 1831 census
                mean: 3,214
                median: 2,656
                min: 395
                max: 14,850
                39 Ancient Counties of England in 1851
                Note that Monmouthshire was considered part of England in 1831. By 1851 it was considered part of Wales. Note also that the largest county, Yorkshire, had 3 subdivisions called Ridings. This tells us a county with 14,850 square kilometers of land area was unwieldy to administer.
                --
                110 Provinces in Italy
                mean: 2,738
                median: 2,461
                min: 212
                max: 7,400
                110 Provinces in Italy
                --
                62 Counties in New York
                mean: 2,270
                median: 2,102
                min: 87
                max: 7,306
                The smallest county, New York, is basically Manhattan, which has one of the highest population densities of any land mass on the planet.

                62 Counties in New York
                --
                22 City States in Ancient Greece (areas are approximate)
                mean: 3,566
                median: 2,392
                min: 82
                max: 22,968
                The smallest city state, Aegina, is a small island off the coast of Athens.

                22 City States in Ancient Greece
                --
                We know the Maya area had many city states that have been compared with counterparts in Ancient Greece and Renaissance Italy. Maps of those city state boundaries at particular time periods are still in their infancy as archaeological data about alliances, tribute and trade patterns continues to evolve. We know Maya polities tended to be more dispersed than similar Old World polities. This means there were large tracts of wilderness interspersed between settled areas, precisely as the Book of Mormon describes. We can deduce some rough estimates of city state land areas in the Maya world.

                The A.D. 378 route of Teotihuacan-affiliated Sihyaj K'ahk' (Fire is Born) is well documented. He first subdued El Peru and eight days later conquered Tikal. This means El Peru and Tikal were neighboring polities in A.D. 378. Naachtun, Uaxactun and La Sufricaya also figure in the narrative. We place a circle with an area of 2,098 square kilometers around El Peru and a similar circle around Tikal. 2,098 square kilometers is the mean land area of the 31 proposed Nephite and Lamanite local lands described above. This comparison is flawed in many ways. We know, for example, that in A.D. 378 Tikal was larger and more powerful than El Peru so it probably maintained influence over a broader territory. Nevertheless, overlaying El Peru and Tikal with our best current estimate of typical Book of Mormon land areas does demonstrate reasonableness. Our hypothesized Nephite and Lamanite land areas are in the Mesoamerican ballpark.
                El Peru & Tikal, Peten, Guatemala
                Six sites in the Pasion river basin in Guatemala are included in what archaeologists commonly call the "Petexbatun State." We place a circle with an area of 2,098 square kilometers around these six sites.
                Sites in the Petexbatun State, Peten, Guatemala
                Three sites in the San Pedro river basin in Guatemala are included in what archaeologists commonly call the "Hix Wix Kingdom." We place a circle with an area of 2,098 square kilometers around these three sites. The white line is the approximate kingdom boundary recognized by archaeologists.
                Sites in the Hix Wix Kingdom, Peten, Guatemala
                Recent archaeological excavations have identified the Anaite Rapids as the boundary between rival Usumacinta river basin states Piedras Negras and Yaxchilan. See Charles Golden and Andrew Scherer, "Border Problems: Recent Archaeological Research along the Usumacinta River" in The PARI Journal, Vol. VII, No. 2, Fall 2006. This border was fortified on the Yaxchilan side. We place a circle with an area of 2,098 square kilometers around Piedras Negras and a similar circle around Yaxchilan.
                Border between Piedras Negras and Yaxchilan
                We have one other control on the size of a land area referenced in the Book of Mormon. The Nephite text mentions the "land of Jerusalem" in the Old World thirty-nine times. We have a good idea of the boundaries of the southern kingdom in the 930 B.C. - 586 B.C. era. when the Dead Sea was to its east, the kingdom of Edom to its south and the Philistine states to its west. Its land area was about 3,762 square kilometers including the cities of Jerusalem, Lachish, Hebron and Beersheba. This means the Levantine land of Jerusalem was similar in size to the other geographic areas we have examined.
                Kingdom of Judah 930 B.C. to 586 B.C.
                These results show consistent common patterns. Humans living within civilizations tend to create local and regional administrative entities whose land areas fall within limits of reasonableness. Any proposed Book of Mormon correlation for the 31 listed local lands whose mean area falls below 1,000 square kilometers is probably too small. Any single land whose absolute area falls below 100 square kilometers is probably too small. Any proposed Book of Mormon correlation for the 31 listed local lands whose mean area exceeds 5,000 square kilometers is probably too large. Any single land whose absolute area exceeds 20,000 square kilometers is probably too large. Our correlation with its mean local land area of 2,098 square kilometers, ranging from a minimum of 359 to a maximum of 9,095, is reasonable and defensible compared with known settlement patterns from antiquity and history. Any viable Book of Mormon text to map correlation should have similarly reasonable local land areas.

                Meet the Mormons

                $
                0
                0
                My wife and I saw "Meet the Mormons" for the 4th time last night. Our first viewing was an Internet stream sent out to LDS Bishops. Our next experience was with 25 family members on October 10th, opening night. On Saturday, October 11th we bought out the theater and hosted 270 ward members. Then last night, we invited a couple in our ward to come with us for family home evening because the husband was unable to attend on the 11th. All four times we laughed and we cried. After all three theatrical showings the packed house erupted in spontaneous applause. We highly recommend this movie. It may be the finest film the Church has ever produced.

                An indirect Book of Mormon connection is in the segment featuring Ken Niumatalolo, head football coach of the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, MD. The first settlers in Annapolis surveyed their land in 1651 at the place called "Annapolis Neck." This neck of land, bounded by Crab Creek, Annapolis Harbor and Chesapeake Bay, is 1.71 kilometers wide at its base.
                Base of Annapolis Neck, Maryland
                U.S. Zip Code 21403 is called Annapolis Neck, Maryland. There are literally hundreds of similar necks of land along the Atlantic seaboard of the U.S., most named during the 1600's. We analyzed over 100 of them in the article "Necks of Land." Annapolis Neck is yet another example demonstrating that during the Early Modern English era a small peninsula was routinely called a "neck."

                Additional examples not documented in the aforementioned article include Horseneck near Westport, Bristol County, MA; Haddam Neck near East Hampton, Middlesex County, CT; Colts Neck in Monmouth County, NJ; Throggs Neck in Bronx County, NY; Mason Neck near Lorton, Fairfax County, VA and Durants Neck in Perquimans County, NC.

                BMAF 2014

                $
                0
                0
                The 12th Annual Book of Mormon Lands Conference sponsored by the Book of Mormon Archaeological Forum (BMAF) was held on Saturday, October 18, 2014 at the Salt Lake Sheraton. Robert Starling chaired this year's conference.

                Geologist and paleontologist Wade E, Miller gave the first presentation on dealing with alleged faunal anachronisms in the text. Miller has advanced degrees from the University of Arizona and UC Berkeley. He has been on the faculty at Fullerton College, Santa Ana College and BYU. Author of more than 80 scientific papers, he has been a paleontology advisor to many institutions and governmental agencies throughout the western U.S. and Mexico. Retired from BYU, he is now a research associate with the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County where he is one of the experts classifying and cataloging the millions of bones recovered from the tar pits at Rancho La Brea. He travels into Mexico frequently to collect fossils and ancient skeletal remains. One of the defining moments in his career was a presentation to LDS young single adults in Italy where many of our young people were going away to college and losing their testimonies. That led to his publication of Creation of the Earth for Man: Views of an LDS Geologist and Science and the Book of Mormon: Cureloms, Cumoms, Horses & More, both in 2010. Miller and Matt Roper are co-authors of the excellent article "Animals in the Book of Mormon: Challenges and Perspectives" published in Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture. Miller gave several examples of animals, long thought to be extinct, that have been found still living in unexpected habitats. He used this as a backdrop to explain the process of extinction which can proceed slowly over centuries or millenia. He discussed over 100 species indigenous to North America that are candidates for the animals mentioned in the text. Some items that stood out:
                • The geology and paleontology implied in the text fit Mesoamerica. They do not fit the much more stable situation in northeastern North America. Volcanism is often accompanied by fierce lightning. Plate tectonics and volcanism explain the destructions recorded in 3 Nephi. Both the Cocos Plate and the Caribbean Plate cross Mesoamerica, making it one of the most active seismic and volcanic zones in the world.
                • Cement is found at Teotihuacan and Tula, Hidalgo. The notion that people in the land northward built with cement because they had no trees is untenable. A great deal of fuel is consumed in the process of burning limestone to create cement.
                • 4 Nephi 1:24 says the people had all manner of fine pearls. Miller showed a photograph of a lovely string of pearls from Mexico. Gem-grade pearls are found in tropical and some sub-tropical waters. Pearls do form in cold waters, but they are small and unattractive. This is another indication the text is set in Mesoamerica.
                • Very little gold exists naturally in the northeastern U.S. Industrial scale gold mining is well-attested in ancient Mesoamerica.
                • Rancho La Brea had horses whose remains date to A.D. 1300. Many dry bones cannot be dated. Collagen in a bone is necessary for radiocarbon dating.
                • Pre-columbian bos taurus cattle remains have been found in Yucatan caves.
                • Pre-columbian euceratherium (shrub ox) remains have been found in Mexico. 
                • The woodland musk ox is now known from ancient Mesoamerica.
                • Peccaries could be the swine mentioned in the text.
                • The true goat oreamnos harringtoni was in Mesoamerica.
                • Red brocket deer, rocky mountain sheep and columbian mammoths were all in Mexico.
                • Mammoths were elephants of the order proboscidea. Mammoth remains have now been found dating from 2,000 B.C.
                • The American mastodon was in Mesoamerica.
                • Antilocapra, the goat deer, is known from Mesoamerica.
                • Llamas have been found at Rancho La Brea. They may have been the very useful cureloms and cumoms mentioned in the text.
                • Equs, the horse, originated in North America. Pre-columbian horse and ass remains have recently been discovered in Carlsbad, CA.
                --
                Scott Hoyt gave the next presentation on the Andean Viracocha and other white, bearded god figures known from Peruvian and Mesoamerican ethnohistory. Hoyt is a retired attorney who practiced with Gibson Dunn in Los Angeles and Dallas. He now divides his time between homes in Dallas, Texas and Midway, Utah. He served a mission to Peru and his book entitled Two Years of Eternity is one of the best first-person mission memoirs currently available. (Full-disclosure: Scott and I [Kirk Magleby] were zone leaders together in Arequipa, Peru,) He began his presentation with a headline published in the Lima newspaper La Prensa "Estuvo Cristo en el Peru?""Was Christ in Peru?" leading to an article by Franklin Pease, one of Peru's foremost authorities on pre-columbian ethnohistory. Drawing on sources such as Pedro Cieza de Leon, Juan de Betanzos, Cristobal de Molina and Pedro Sarmiento de Gamboa, Hoyt drew relationships between legends of an ancient white, bearded god who visited the Andes, the Guatemalan Popol Vuh recently corroborated by murals unearthed at the Peten sites El Mirador and San Bartolo, the various books of Chilam Balam from Yucatan and the Book of Mormon account in 3 Nephi. Some interesting points:

                • The ancient American creator god organized pre-existing matter, contra the Catholic conception of creation ex-nihilo.
                • The Popol Vuh, for example, characterizes the creator as dominator of chaos.
                • Viracocha had two helpers as he created the earth. The Popol Vuh describes three creator gods.
                • Viracocha's visit to Peru was preceded by massive destruction as in 3 Nephi 8.
                • Some indigenous iconography depicts a weeping god. Ditto 3 Nephi 17:21-22


                  Borders

                  $
                  0
                  0
                  We find the term "borders" 75 times in the Book of Mormon, once referring to the bounds of a person's home or property 3 Nephi 22:12 (citing Isaiah 54:12), once referring to the extent of the Kingdom of God upon the earth also symbolized by the Stakes of Zion Moroni 10:31 (cited in D&C 82:14 which is a gloss on 2 Nephi 8:24& 3 Nephi 20:36, both of which cite Isaiah 52:1), and 73 times referring to Book of Mormon places we expect to eventually locate on the modern map. The singular "border" never appears. We saw earlier there is a strong affinity between the words "borders" and "by" in the text. See the blog article "By and By." This post will analyze all occurrences of "borders" in an attempt to shed light on the Nephite meaning of the term. Potential synonyms "edge,""margin,""littoral,""boundary,""bounds," and "perimeter" were not used in the version of the record we have today. Antonyms "center" and "heart" are attested in the text and will be included in our analysis where they are used in spatial contexts. We will also look at the 4 instances of the word "bordering" and the 2 instances of the word "bordered."

                  Entities with borders in the Nephite worldview
                  - City of Ammonihah Alma 49:2 (armies of the Lamanites)
                  - Land governed by King Noah Mosiah 18:4, Mosiah 18:31 [in the records of the Zeniff colony, Mormon was merely a "place"Mosiah 18:4, 7, 16, 30. One generation later, Alma2 called it a "land"Alma 5:3. Mormon also called it by its more elevated name "land of Mormon"3 Nephi 5:12.] (coterminous with Mormon and its fountain of pure water)
                  - Land governed by King Limhi which may have been coterminous with the land governed by his father, King Noah Mosiah 21:2 [local land of Nephi, land of Shilom, place of Mormon] (bellicose, oppressive  Lamanites)
                  - Land of Helam Mosiah 23:25 (land of pure water, army of the Lamanites)
                  - Land of Jershon Alma 43:22 (on the east by the sea, army of Zerahemnah)
                  - Land of Melek Alma 8:5 (west of river Sidon, by the wilderness side of Melek)
                  - Land of Moroni Alma 62:34 (armies of Moroni, Lehi & Teancum; wilderness south of Moroni; wilderness east of Moroni)
                  - Local land of Nephi Mosiah 21:26, Alma 5:3 (Limhi explorers, waters of Mormon)
                  - Land of Shemlon Mosiah 19:6 (army of the Lamanites)
                  - Greater land of Zarahemla Alma 3:23 [land of Minon] (armies of the Lamanites)
                  - Greater land of Zarahemla Alma 16:2 [city of Ammonihah] (wilderness side of Ammonihah, armies of the Lamanites)
                  - Local land of Zarahemla Alma 2:36 (armies of the Lamanites, Amlicites)
                  - Northern kingdom of Israel destroyed by the Assyrians ca. 721 B.C. 2 Nephi 20:13 [citing Isaiah 10:13 where the Book of Mormon "borders" is translated variously as "bounds,""boundaries,""defenses" or "territory."] (army of the Assyrians)
                  - Wilderness between the Dead Sea and the Gulf of Aqaba 1 Nephi 2:5 (near the shore of the Red Sea)
                  - Wilderness east of the Gulf of Aqaba 1 Nephi 2:5, 1 Nephi 2:8 (nearer the Red Sea, near the mouth of river Laman)
                  - Wilderness east of the Red Sea 1 Nephi 16:14 (near the Red Sea)
                  - Wilderness west of Mulek Alma 8:3 (west of river Sidon)

                  Things associated with borders
                  - Wilderness
                  - Water
                  - Military & para-military actions

                  Test #8 Limhi Expedition

                  $
                  0
                  0
                  Ca. 121 B.C. beleaguered King Limhi dispatched an expedition from the city of Nephi to find the land of Zarahemla and request aid Mosiah 21:25. The 43 explorers never found Zarahemla. They found the ruins of the Jaredite nation Mosiah 8:8-9, Ether 1:2 in the land the Nephites would later call Cumorah. As the diligent exploring party returned to Nephi bearing Jaredite artifacts, they thought they had found Zarahemla and their people, including King Limhi, also believed they had found the sad remains of the once-great Nephite nation.

                  In the 2 generations since their grandfathers had gone down from Nephi to Zarahemla and then come up from Zarahemla to reclaim Nephi, the people of King Limhi had clearly forgotten the precise route back to their ancestral homeland. Zeniff, King Limhi's grandfather, had made the Nephi to Zarahemla round-trip twice. Zeniff was a meticulous record-keeper and his grandson not only possessed his archive but continued his grandfather's record-keeping tradition Mosiah 25:5. So, Limhi's exploring party must have had some general knowledge of these key relationships:
                  • Direction of Zarahemla from Nephi
                  • Distance of Zarahemla from Nephi
                  • Elevation of Zarahemla relative to Nephi
                  • Location of Zarahemla relative to river Sidon
                  • Location of Zarahemla relative to the mountains, fall line, coastal plain and seacoast
                  LDS Mesoamericanists generally agree that the land of Nephi was in highland Guatemala with Kaminaljuyu a leading candidate for the city of Nephi. They further agree that the land of Cumorah was in the Tuxtla Mountains of southern Veracruz with Cerro Vigia a leading candidate for Hill Ramah - Cumorah.

                  We have established that a reasonable size for the local land of Zarahemla would be on the order of 2,000 - 3,500 square kilometers. See the blog article Test #7 Land Areas. A land with dimensions 50 X 50 kilometers would have a surface area of 2,500 square kilometers. We have established that a reasonable distance from the city of Nephi to the local land of Zarahemla would be on the order of 320 air kilometers. See the blog articles Test #6 Relative Distances and Land Southward Travel Times. If you set an origin point 320 air kilometers distant from a 50 X 50 kilometer area the vectors from origin will diverge by slightly more than 9 degrees of arc.
                  Hypothetical Area 320 Air Kilometers from Point of Origin
                  With this background in mind, any viable text to map correlation will include a route for Limhi's exploring party that conforms to these 9 criteria:

                  1. The arc between the vectors Nephi/Cumorah (the route Limhi's explorers actually traveled) and Nephi/Zarahemla (the route they should have traveled) will exceed 10 degrees. Vectors closer than 10 degrees of arc imply the Limhi expedition would have found Zarahemla.

                  2. The arc between the vectors Nephi/Cumorah and Nephi/Zarahemla will not exceed 45 degrees. Vectors more than 45 degrees divergent depreciate the Zeniff colony records. Zeniff himself traveled the Nephi/Zarahemla route 4 times with large groups of people and he wrote a detailed history Mosiah 9:1 so Limhi's explorers had a general idea of the direction they should travel.

                  3. The distance Nephi/local land of Zarahemla will be about 320 air kilometers.

                  4. The distance Nephi/land of Cumorah will not be less than 160 air kilometers (320/2).

                  5. The distance Nephi/ land of Cumorah will not exceed 640 air kilometers (320 X 2). The distance Nephi/land of Cumorah will not be greater than 2X the distance Nephi/local land of Zarahemla. An analogue: If one sets out to travel from Cedar City, Utah to Lehi, Utah (320 air kilometers), by the time they arrive in Idaho Falls, Idaho (648 air kilometers), the diligent traveler will realize they have gone too far.

                  6. The land of Cumorah will be lower in elevation than the land of Nephi since one always went up from Zarahemla to Nephi Mosiah 9:3.

                  7. The land of Cumorah will be west of a large north-flowing river Limhi's explorers could have mistaken for the Sidon since the local land of Zarahemla was west of Sidon Alma 6:7.

                  8. The local land of Zarahemla will be in the coastal plain downstream from the mountains and the fall line since that is where Limhi's explorers were when they found what they thought was Zarahemla.

                  9. The lay of the land and direction of flow of the rivers should make it obvious where the Limhi expedition went wrong such that they ended up in Cumorah rather than Zarahemla.
                  --
                  In our correlation, Kaminaljuyu = City of Nephi, Nueva Esperanza - Calatraba = City of Zarahemla, the Pilapa = eastern border of the land of Cumorah, and Boca del Cerro = southern border of the local land of Zarahemla. The arc between our Nephi/Cumorah and Nephi/Zarahemla vectors varies from a minimum of 26 degrees to a maximum of 32 degrees.
                  Vectors from Proposed Nephi to Cumorah & Zarahemla
                  Criteria 1& 2 satisfied.
                  --
                  The distance from Kaminaljuyu to Boca del Cerro is 325 air kilometers. Criterion 3 satisfied. The distance from Kaminaljuyu to the Pilapa River is 608 air kilometers. Criterion 4 satisfied. 325 X 2 = 650 air kilometers. Criterion 5 satisfied.
                  --
                  Kaminaljuyu sits astride the continental divide at an elevation of 1,550 meters. A handful of volcanic peaks in the Tuxtla Mountains rise to elevations of 1,600 - 1,650 meters. The surrounding countryside slopes abruptly down from these summits. Over 80% of the surface area of our proposed land of Cumorah has an elevation lower than 500 meters. Criterion 6 satisfied,
                  --
                  The Limhi explorers could have mistaken the large, north-flowing Coatzacoalcos for the Sidon. Our proposed land of Cumorah lies to the west of the Coatzacoalcos.
                  Map with Coatzacoalcos River Indicated
                  Criterion 7 satisfied.
                  --
                  The green line on the map below is the 100 meter fall line along the Mesoamerican Gulf of Mexico coast. This is the line where the southern highlands end and the northern coastal plain begins.
                  100 Meter Fall Line Limit of the Coastal Plain
                  Our proposed local land of Zarahemla, shown in red, lies almost entirely within the coastal plain. Criterion 8 satisfied. The black vectors approximate the journey of Limhi's explorers from Nephi to the land of Cumorah. 28% of the distance the 43 expedition members traveled was in the coastal plain downstream from the fall line.
                  --
                  On the map below the Chixoy - Usumacinta system is in red, the Mezcalapa - Grijalva system is in blue and all other river systems are in yellow. The black vectors represent the approximate route the Limhi expedition followed from Nephi to Cumorah. The white vectors represent the approximate route they should have followed to reach Zarahemla (the actual route went through the Salama Valley around the point we call head of Sidon). The explorers traveled through five major river basins, three of which are shown on the map.
                  • approx. 77 kilometers or 12% of the distance traveled was in the Motagua basin
                  • approx. 43 kilometers or 6% of the distance traveled was in the Usumacinta basin
                  • approx. 328 kilometers or 49% of the distance traveled was in the Grijalva basin
                  • approx. 216 kilometers or 33% of the distance traveled was in the Coatzacoalcos & Papaloapan basins
                  Motagua, Usumacinta & Grijalva River Basins
                  If our correlation is correct, the Nephites in the local land of Nephi were very familiar with the Motagua River. Our hill north of Shilom where King Noah built one of his towers Mosiah 11:13 lies across the Motagua from the local lands of Nephi and Shilom. The Nephites probably knew the Motagua flows eastward to empty into what they called the east sea. They probably also knew that the Sidon flows northwesterly. Crossing the Usumacinta basin, they likely noted the eastward flow of the rivers and thought they were still on a tributary of the Motagua. Pushing northward and westward they found rivers in the Grijalva basin flowing northwesterly. Thinking they had found the Sidon drainage, they followed the Grijalva to the coastal plain without success before moving westward to the Coatzacoalcos and beyond. They successfully crossed the Motagua as they should have done. They erred is traveling NW across the Motagua when they should have gone counter-intuitively NE around the head of Sidon. Criterion 9 satisfied.
                  --
                  Our correlation comfortably fits all 9 textual criteria. Any viable correlation should show a similarly high degree of fit to the text.

                  Benjamin Cluff Expedition Route & Distances

                  $
                  0
                  0
                  While Benjamin Cluff (1858-1948) was President of Brigham Young Academy, later BYU, he led an audacious group of explorers on a hemispheric quest to find the city of Zarahemla which they thought was on the west bank of the north-flowing Magdalena in the modern nation of Colombia. Leaving Provo in 1900 and returning in 1902, the group traveled to northern South America on horseback, on foot and in small boats.
                  The Cluff Expedition Leaving Provo in 1900
                  The size of the group gradually dwindled as sickness, waning enthusiasm and meager finances all took a toll.
                  The Cluff Expedition on the Trail in 1902
                  The data below comes from the journal of expedition member Heber Lorenzo Magleby (1874-1941), my great-great uncle.
                  Heber Lorenzo Magleby in 1896
                  The original autograph of Magleby's journal is in the L. Tom Perry Special Collections of the Harold B. Lee Library at BYU. A typescript is in the J. Willard Marriott Library at the  U of U. Cluff and Magleby were among the stalwarts who made it the entire way from Utah to Colombia and back. The two of them later returned to Mexico and ran rubber plantations in Tabasco.

                  On February 17, 1901 the expedition left Tehuantepec, Oaxaca, Mexico and 67 days later on April 25, 1901 they arrived at Copan, Copan, Honduras. During this time they traveled 1,074 air kilometers in 22 legs of travel. They had 57 travel days and 10 rest or sight-seeing days during this period. Traversing much of the area we now identify as the Book of Mormon land southward, their journey helps establish a benchmark for pre-industrial travel rates in southern Mesoamerica.

                  Route of the Cluff Expedition through Southern Mexico and Guatemala
                  The northern legs of their route allowed them so see the impressive ruins of Palenque. These are the 22 legs of their travel.
                  Cluff Expedition Air (Straight Line) Distances Traveled
                  In the blog article "Land Southward Travel Times" we analyzed a number of pre-industrial journeys in southern Mesoamerica, the earliest dating from AD 378, in an attempt to deduce a likely value for the Nephite standard unit of distance measure "one day's travel." We concluded 15 air kilometers per day was a reasonable metric. The Cluff Expedition median of 16.70 and mean of 17.89 lend credibility to our derived value of 15 air kilometers per day.

                  Apostolic Witness

                  $
                  0
                  0
                  One of the strongest testimonies of the Book of Mormon I have heard was given by Elder Jeffrey R. Holland in October, 2009 General Conference. His stirring witness was redacted into a powerful 4 1/2 minute 2010 Mormon Message. The image below is not interactive, even though it shows the video play symbol. Click on either of the two preceding text links to watch video.
                  Elder Holland Holding Hyrum Smith's Copy of the Book of Mormon
                  I appreciate Elder Holland's eloquence, reminiscent of Elder Neal A. Maxwell. I love his passion and respect his intellect. This phrase in particular caught my attention: "As one of a thousand elements of my own testimony of the divinity of the Book of Mormon, I submit this as yet one more evidence of its truthfulness." The context is the role the Book of Mormon played in the lives of Joseph and Hyrum Smith immediately preceding their martyrdom.

                  I was in Jack Welch's office yesterday. Since the late 1960's he has participated in the scholarly research, editing and publication of many of the "thousand elements" Elder Holland referred to. (The Apostle specifically mentioned "literary and Semitic complexity" in the text.) This resonates with me because my own experience has been a gradual increase in the depth of my understanding of and appreciation for the Nephite scripture. In my current calling as Bishop of a large and diverse ward, I have tried to help many members through faith crises. No matter if their doubts stem from Joseph Smith's plural wives, arcane episodes in Church history, Book of Abraham facsimiles, contemporary Church finances or their own moral turpitude, testimonies ultimately come back to the Book of Mormon. I bear unequivocal witness the Book of Mormon is an ancient record translated by the gift and power of God. The Book of Mormon is the safe harbor Elder Holland mentions that will help all find healing, hope and peace through Jesus Christ. In the Apostle's words, "for [184] years this book has been examined and attacked, denied and deconstructed, targeted and torn apart ...and still it stands." For decades I have heard alternative explanations for the Book of Mormon's origin and they all ring hollow. They are "frankly pathetic" as Elder Holland says compared with the grandeur, sophistication and subtlety of the text itself.

                  I find it vital to recognize both divine and human elements in the Church. If I infer humanity where there is divinity, I miss the awe. If I infer divinity where there is humanity, I have unrealistic expectations. The Book of Mormon is foundational. It is bedrock. It is in Elder Holland's articulation "one of the Lord's powerful keystones..." The Book of Mormon is the most divine object most of us will have the blessing to experience this side of the veil.

                  "I want it absolutely clear when I stand before the judgment bar of God that I declared to the world, in the most straightforward language I could summon, that the Book of Mormon is true, that it came forth the way Joseph said it came forth and was given to bring happiness and hope to the faithful in the travail of the latter days." Elder Jeffrey R. Holland, October 2009 General Conference address entitled "Safety for the Soul"

                  The Legal Cases in the Book of Mormon

                  $
                  0
                  0
                  Neal Rappleye and I spent the afternoon yesterday with Jack Welch in his office. He described his presentation in July to the Jewish Law Association Conference at the University of Antwerp. His paper was entitled "Narrating Homicide in the Hebrew Bible and the Book of Mormon." The Nephite text early on tells the story of a gripping homicide (1 Nephi 4) and many others are mentioned. The theme of the conference was "Judaism, Law and Literature." This snippet from the conference program helps put Jack's presentation in context.
                  Jewish Law Association Morning Conference Sessions
                  July 15, 2014, Antwerp, Belgium
                  From the time he left private practice in Los Angeles to join the BYU Law Faculty over thirty years ago, John W. Welch has been an avid student of Biblical Law in both Jewish and Nephite literature. Students in his ancient law classes through the years have authored hundreds of papers, many of which bear on aspects of Biblical Law evident in the Book of Mormon text.

                  Welch's important book The Legal Cases in the Book of Mormon (Provo: BYU Press and Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship, 2008) is an accessible introduction to a major aspect of the Book of Mormon unfamiliar to most students. Written for a general audience and highly readable, it highlights just how much jurisprudence is in the Nephite text, and the astonishing degree to which Nephite legal process followed pre-exilic Jewish patterns.
                  Jack Welch's 2008 Book
                  I consider this hard-cover book so important - it pioneers an entirely new genre within Book of Mormon Studies - I will send a copy free of charge (while supplies last) to anyone who requests it via old-fashioned paper letter sent to Ancient America Foundation, PO Box 1538, American Fork, UT 84003-6538. Be sure to include your return postal address. If you prefer Amazon, click here. Before I read Welch's book, I had read the Book of Mormon dozens of times, often with considerable care. After reading The Legal Cases in the Book of Mormon, I will never read the Book of Mormon the same way again. It opened my eyes to many points of ancient judicial process that I had not previously recognized in the text because like most, I am not trained in Biblical Law.

                  Jack Welch is not only a student of Biblical Law in the Book of Mormon. He is a significant contributor to the global Biblical Law discipline generally and has been a member of the Jewish Law Association (JLA) for decades. He has served on the steering committee of the Society of Biblical Literature (SBL) Section on Biblical Law. Through his tireless efforts and the manpower provided by his students over decades, BYU is an important source of bibliographic reference materials in the field.

                  Sermon at the Temple

                  $
                  0
                  0
                  The Sermon on the Mount in Matthew 5 - 7 may be the single most influential religious text in all of recorded history. It defines the essence of Christianity for multitudes past and present. The fact that a very similar sermon appears in 3 Nephi 11 - 18 has provided fodder for critics of the Book of Mormon who contend that Joseph Smith simply lifted this iconic text from the King James Bible. Upon close examination it is now clear both the Matthew and 3 Nephi versions have significant dependencies on much earlier temple texts. Two key players in this unfolding exegetical drama are Margaret Barker who read theology at Cambridge and John W. (Jack) Welch who read Greek philosophy at Oxford.

                  Dr. Barker, an English Methodist preacher, is widely recognized as the founder of Temple Theology, a branch of inquiry within Biblical (primarily Old Testament) Studies.She was elected President of the Society for Old Testament Study (SOTS) in 1998 and edited the Society's second monograph series published by Ashgate. Barker is the author of 16 books. She was awarded the Doctor of Divinity degree in 2008 by the Archbishop of Canterbury "in recognition of her work on the Jerusalem Temple and the origins of Christian Liturgy, which has made a significantly new contribution to our understanding of the New Testament and opened up important new fields for resrearch." In 2008 she and others founded the Temple Studies Group which believes the Temple in Jerusalem had a formative influence on the development of Christianity. (One is reminded of Hugh W. Nibley's 1959 Jewish Quarterly Review article "Christian Envy of the Temple" published in Mormonism and Early Christianity, vol. 4 in The Collected Works of Hugh Nibley (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book and FARMS, 1987). The North American Academy for Temple Studies headquartered at Utah State University spun off from the UK-based Temple Studies Group. Jack Welch, Philip Barlow and Gary N. Anderson form the Academy for Temple Studies executive committee. For some intriguing Book of Mormon connections with ancient Temple lore, see the blog article "Temple Conference 2013."

                  Welch, Robert K. Thomas Professor of Law at the J. Reuben Clark Law School, BYU and Editor-in-Chief, BYU Studies, formed the Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies (FARMS, now the Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship, BYU) in 1979. Jack studied history, philosophy, Latin and Greek at BYU, Greek philosophy at Oxford (St. Edmund Hall), then law at Duke where he edited the Law Journal. While at Duke, Welch studied with James H. Charlesworth, now George L. Collord Professor of New Testament Language and Literature at Princeton Theological Seminary. Welch is a member of the steering committee of the BYU New Testament Commentary.

                  Welch's book Illuminating the Sermon at the Temple & Sermon on the Mount: An Approach  to 3 Nephi 11-18 and Matthew 5-7 (Provo: Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship, 1998) broke new ground as it compared the two texts and found many concepts, phrases and symbols clearly derived from earlier temple literature.
                  Reading the Sermon on the Mount as a Temple Text in Light of 3 Nephi 11
                  The Cover Painting is by Minerva Teichert
                  Margaret Barker has long been popular among LDS scholars because her Temple Theology bridges the Old and New Testament worlds just as the Book of Mormon and contemporary Mormonism do. Many Christian thinkers like to see the New Testament as a completely new and revolutionary worldview. Barker and most Jewish scholars view the New Testament as a late expression of pre-existing ideas, traditions, customs and symbolism from an earlier era. The Book of Mormon fits comfortably in the Barker - Jewish camp. Barker liked Welch's book and appreciated how beautifully the Book of Mormon elucidates and expands upon the Bible while dovetailing seamlessly with it. (For an Evangelical turned Catholic articulation of the same idea, see the blog article "Mormon Christianity" which discusses the work of Stephen H. Webb). This idea of Book of Mormon as extension of and reinforcement to the Bible is expressed powerfully in 1 Nephi 13 and 2 Nephi 29.

                  Barker asked Welch to do another treatment of his Sermon on the Mount material minus the Book of Mormon content for mainstream Old Testament scholars. At first Welch was hesitant. Leaving out the Nephite text would handicap him. After all, it was 3 Nephi that clarified many of the Old Testament - New Testament relationships in the first place. As he got into the project, though, Jack discovered rich new veins of material to work with in the Psalms and other post-exilic Old Testament sources. In his 1998 analysis, he had limited his use of the Old Testament to texts that would have been on the brass plates of Laban spirited out of Jerusalem ca. 600 B.C. In 2009 Welch's The Sermon on the Mount in the Light of the Temple appeared in the Society for Old Testament Study Monograph Series edited by Margaret Barker and published by Ashgate.
                  Reading the Sermon on the Mount as a Temple Text
                  The Book of Mormon only appears once in this work, at the end of the final chapter as another example of the Sermon on the Mount in a Temple setting.

                  Welch's use of the terms 'illuminating' in 1998 and 'light' in 2009 are not coincidental. Temple liturgy as revealed by the Prophet Joseph in this the Dispensation of the Fullness of Times Ephesians 1:10, Doctrine & Covenants 128:18, etc. is a restoration of Temple worship in Old Testament times and the Temple clarifies and brightens our understanding of Matthew 5 - 7. Matthew, of course, was the Gospel writer who specifically targeted a Jewish audience. When Jack discovered chiasmus in the Book of Mormon on August 16, 1967 in Regensburg, Germany, the voice that startled him said "if it is evidence of Hebrew style in the Bible (referring specifically to the Book of Matthew), it must be evidence of Hebrew style in the Book of Mormon." John W. Welch, "The Discovery of Chiasmus in the Book of Mormon: Forty Years Later" in Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 16/2 (2007). A PDF of the article is available here.

                  As Neal Rappleye deftly observed in Welch's office on Friday, December 19, 2014 these two John W. Welch books are a formidable vindication of 1 Nephi 13:40. A work of Book of Mormon scholarship led directly to significant Biblical scholarship. We now understand the Bible better because of insights gleaned from the Book of Mormon.

                  Viewing all 358 articles
                  Browse latest View live